Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, by Elad Benari, on Iran, 5 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Trump on possible new strikes against Iran: You will know soon enough

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

US President Donald Trump warned Thursday that American forces remained prepared to launch additional strikes against Iran, although he expressed hope that further military action could be avoided. Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office, Trump reiterated his determination to prevent Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons and asserted that Iran could not take action without Washington's consent. "They’re not doing anything without our approval.

Remember what I said to you: Iran will never have a nuclear weapon. They're not doing anything without our approval." Trump also rejected comparisons between and the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine. "Nobody’s been killed in about seven months, six months.And you know, if you look at Russia, Ukraine, see, that’s a war. 25,000 people being killed a month. That’s war. Iran, no," he insisted. Asked about the possibility of renewed American military operations against Iran, the President suggested that a decision could be forthcoming.

"I would rather not destroy the rest of the country if possible, but maybe I’ll have to. You will know soon enough." "If we have to do the rest of the Iran thing, we’re very much locked and loaded," he stressed. The remarks came two days after Republicans suffered a major defeat in the midterm elections, with Democrats winning control of both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Trump also hinted that his administration was preparing several initiatives in the coming days, without providing details.

"We’re going to do a lot of things. You’ll be seeing a lot of things over the next week, two weeks. We have a lot of things cooking," he said. Trump’s comments came hours after The New York Times reported that Iran is considering proposals put forward by international mediators concerning its nuclear program, potentially opening a path toward renewed negotiations with the United States. The reported proposals represent a possible breakthrough .

Officials, including one American and two Iranians, described the proposals as substantive but did not disclose their details. On Tuesday, Trump told the Financial Times that he had no immediate plans to launch additional strikes against Iran, although American forces remained prepared for further military action. "It's a brilliant situation," Trump said, expressing satisfaction with Washington's position. The President also disputed the characterization of the confrontation as an ongoing war, pointing to the damage inflicted on Iran's nuclear infrastructure during previous American operations.

“We're not really in a war, because we hit them with the B2 bombers and wiped out their nuclear potential incapacity. We then hit them again, Epic Fury, etc... But if you think about it, we haven't really had a war with them in a long time, six months, maybe more." "I don't consider that we're in war like Ukraine, wars like World War I, World War II," he added. Trump confirmed that indirect negotiations with Tehran were continuing, including discussions about Iran's approximately 1,000-pound stockpile of enriched uranium, which he described as “nuclear dust".

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says that the US and Israel launched a war on Iran in February that has not been settled. Trump's claims that 'nobody's been killed' and 'we're not really in a war' therefore stand with nothing against them. A reader comes away believing there is no war, and that the hostilities are a past US-only matter, when other coverage of the same remarks reports an unsettled US-Israeli war.

How we know

"Even though it's under hundreds of tons of rock, I would say that I'm not happy that it will be there," he said. "So it's one of the things that we do talk to them about. But you know, we're having discussions, and we'll see how that all works out." The President said American forces were "locked and loaded if we need to go, but there may be no reason for it," adding that "We seem to be getting everything we want" in the negotiations.

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

Arutz Sheva reports Trump's Oval Office remarks on possible new strikes on Iran mostly through his own quotes. In its own voice it calls the US-Israeli war on Iran 'the confrontation' and, with no source, refers to 'weeks of Iranian resistance' to talks. It does not say the war began in February and is unsettled.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “following weeks of Iranian resistance to further negotiations”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice, with no source, the outlet says 'weeks of Iranian resistance to further negotiations' came before the proposals.
    The impression it gives
    Iran alone had been refusing to negotiate, so the stalled diplomacy was Tehran's fault.
    The context
    The article itself reports that Trump confirmed indirect negotiations with Tehran were continuing. The outlet's own earlier report quotes Vance saying Washington had held good conversations with the Iranians. Blaming Iran for resisting talks is a framing nobody in the article is credited with.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Tells the event as something else

    Minor

    “the confrontation with Iran”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the outlet calls the US-Israeli war on Iran 'the confrontation', the same word it repeats when it reports Trump disputing that it is a war.
    The impression it gives
    There is a tense standoff with Iran rather than a war in which the US and Israel attacked the country.
    The context
    Other coverage of the same remarks calls it the US-Israeli war on Iran, begun in February and not yet settled. Trump himself says in the article that the US 'hit them with the B2 bombers' and then 'hit them again'.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says that the US and Israel launched a war on Iran in February that has not been settled. Trump's claims that 'nobody's been killed' and 'we're not really in a war' therefore stand with nothing against them. A reader comes away believing there is no war, and that the hostilities are a past US-only matter, when other coverage of the same remarks reports an unsettled US-Israeli war.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 5 NovReport: Iran may resume nuclear negotiations3.0
  2. 5 NovIranian lawmakers: Dems or GOP, it's all the same to us6.0
  3. 5 NovWatch: Iranians burn images of Trump, Netanyahu at Tehran Rally6.0
  4. 5 NovUS imposes new Iran sanctions, Bessent warns: We know where you are3.0
  5. 4 NovTrump agrees Iran war cost votes, but insists: 'I'd have to do it again'0.0

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News