We do not republish articles from The Jewish Chronicle. Our findings are below, each quoting the words it is about. Read the full article on the outlet's own site.
The Jewish Chronicle reports the Charity Commission's official warning to Lewisham Islamic Centre and gives the mosque's response at length. Its headline, however, tells readers the warning was over 'antizionist' sermons, a reason the regulator never gave: the body itself says the commission did not specify which comments prompted the warning.
Headline goes beyond the article
Minor
“over ‘inflammatory’ antizionist sermons”
Why this matters
The headline joins the commission's quoted word 'inflammatory' to the Jewish Chronicle's own label 'antizionist'. This presents anti-Zionism as the reason for the regulator's warning.
The impression it gives
A reader believes the Charity Commission warned the mosque because its sermons were anti-Zionist.
The context
The body says the commission did not specify which comments prompted the warning. The regulator's stated grounds were content that was 'inflammatory, divisive, and not in the Charity's best interests' and failures over risk assessment and speaker policies. Other coverage reports the finding was 'connected, but not limited to' two sermons and also took other events into account. 'Antizionist' is the outlet's description, not the regulator's.
How we know
Elsewhere in the article“did not specify which comments in particular had prompted the warning”
Elsewhere in the article“content that was inflammatory, divisive, and not in the Charity’s best interests”