The New York Times, on UK Politics, 2 October 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

Widdecombe Murder Suspect Charged With Preparing Acts of Terrorism, Including Against Farage

No framing issues found.

The British police on Friday charged a 28-year-old man with preparing to commit acts of terrorism, including against Nigel Farage, a member of Parliament and the leader of Reform U.K., the right-wing populist party. The man, Joshua Kerry of Rotherham, in northern England, was charged with one count of preparation of terrorist acts, the counterterrorism police said in a statement . The charge relates to activity between May 31, 2024, and July 8, 2026, the police added.

“The charge announced today is a result of the tireless work of investigators across the Counter Terrorism Policing network,” said Vicki Evans, the deputy assistant commissioner for the department. Mr. Kerry was charged earlier this year with the murder of Ann Widdecombe, 78, the right-wing British politician who was found dead in her home on July 9. Prosecutors have said that Ms. Widdecombe was struck 21 times on the head with a hammer during an attack the day before.

Her killing sent shock-waves through Britain’s political community. The statement on Friday provided no details about what Mr. Kerry was accused of doing in connection with Mr. Farage. British criminal justice rules limit what can be made public after someone has been charged with committing a crime in order to avoid prejudicing a trial. The police said Mr. Kerry was set to appear in court on Oct. 7.

Read the original article on nytimes.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

The New York Times reports that Joshua Kerry, already charged with the murder of Ann Widdecombe, has now been charged with preparing acts of terrorism, including against Nigel Farage. It attributes each claim to the police or prosecutors and explains why so few details are public. Nothing in it misleads the reader.

What it gets right

  • “was charged with one count of preparation of terrorist acts, the counterterrorism police said in a statement”

    The Times gives the exact charge and attributes it to the police. It does not turn an allegation into fact.

  • “Prosecutors have said”

    The Times attributes the details of the attack to prosecutors, which is right for a case that has not yet been tried.

  • “British criminal justice rules limit what can be made public after someone has been charged with committing a crime in order to avoid prejudicing a trial.”

    The Times tells readers why details are missing, so they do not fill the gap with speculation about the alleged plot.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The New York Times

Everything we scored from The New York Times