The Telegraph, on UK Politics, 25 October 2026

The Telegraph takes the Scottish Conservatives' reading of a Sunday Times investigation and writes it as its own finding of fact: the SNP "is wasting millions" on "ghost jobs", even though the article later says the staff concerned are asked to do junior or ad hoc duties "rather than relaxing at home". The headline drops the hedging the body uses, where the 800 staff are "reportedly" on the payroll and the 17-year case is what "the newspaper claimed". It also tells readers in its own voice that the SNP's "hands were tied" by the redundancy ban.

6.0

Serious

out of 10

What we found

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “The SNP is wasting millions a year on “ghost jobs””

    What the words do
    Puts the opposition's verdict, that this money is wasted on jobs that are not jobs, into the Telegraph's own voice with no attribution.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That it is an established fact, not a political claim, that the money buys nothing.
    What is actually the case
    The article itself says the staff on redeployment are asked to carry out less senior roles or ad hoc duties "rather than relaxing at home", and the "gravy train" characterisation belongs to the Scottish Conservatives' finance spokesman, who is quoted making it.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“rather than relaxing at home”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Scotland’s public sector has become a gravy train for insiders”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Scottish public bodies spend £2.3m a month on staff whose roles have been cut while they await redeployment, according to figures obtained by the Sunday Times under freedom of information laws. The Scottish Conservatives call the system waste; the Scottish Government says redeployed staff are expected to be engaged in appropriate work for their pay scale.

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “the SNP’s hands were tied by a ban on compulsory redundancies”

    What the words do
    States in the Telegraph's own voice that the governing party had no choice, while giving no source for that judgement.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the SNP government is powerless over the policy it is being blamed for.
    What is actually the case
    The article reports two sentences later that the First Minister is under pressure to change the policy and that opposition leaders want the ban lifted, so the article's own facts show the policy is the government's to alter.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“under pressure to change the policy”
    • Elsewhere in the article“if the redundancy ban stays in place”

    Show it in the article

  3. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “SNP spends millions on public sector ‘ghost jobs’”

    What the words do
    Drops the hedging the body carries and turns another newspaper's investigation into the Telegraph's own flat assertion.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the Telegraph has established the "ghost jobs" finding itself.
    What is actually the case
    The body says the 800 staff are "reportedly" on the payroll and that the 17-year case is what "the newspaper claimed", and it attributes the investigation to the Sunday Times.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“reportedly on the taxpayer-funded payroll”
    • Elsewhere in the article“the newspaper claimed”

    Show it in the article

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

because of stringent restrictions on sacking public sector workers. About 800 employees in the NHS, quangos and the Scottish Government are reportedly on the taxpayer-funded payroll despite no longer having a fixed role. In most organisations, the workers would have been made redundant, but in the public sector that was introduced in 2007. An investigation by the Sunday Times found 255 Scottish public-sector workers had not worked a fixed job for more than a year, and at least 49 who had been on a full salary for five years or more after the role they were hired for became obsolete. One NHS Highland worker, the newspaper claimed, had been receiving their full salary and benefits for 17 years despite not having a specific job any more. The health board refused to say what the worker had been doing in that time or what they had been paid. “Ghost workers” are staff whose roles have been cut but who remain on the public payroll. Instead of being made redundant, the workers are placed in a redeployment pool while they wait for another role to become available in their organisation, typically with the same pay and benefits. Staff on redeployment are usually asked to carry out less senior roles or ad-hoc duties while they await a new permanent position, rather than relaxing at home. The system works as intended for junior staff who are easier to redeploy, but becomes harder for older workers who are on higher salaries and have more specialised roles. John Swinney is under pressure to change the policy amid Scotland’s £5bn deficit . Opposition leaders say the First Minister’s plans to streamline Scotland’s NHS boards will be impossible if the redundancy ban stays in place. The Scottish Tories have demanded that the Auditor General for Scotland – the public spending watchdog – launch an investigation into the findings. ‘A system completely out of control’ Craig Hoy, the party’s finance and local government spokesman, said: “Scotland’s public sector has become a gravy train for insiders. “Some have been left languishing in zombie jobs for 17 years, a jaw-dropping indictment of a system completely out of control.” The Scottish NHS spends £1.4m a month employing workers with no permanent jobs, based on figures provided for 315 workers. Information was not disclosed for another 185. NHS Scotland said it was committed to retaining employees when they were “displaced”, or unable to continue in the jobs they had been hired to carry out. Its policy says they should be given “meaningful duties” while waiting for a new post. In cases where a job is lost because of “organisational change”, workers will receive their previous salary even if they are redeployed to a more junior post. The figures were obtained under freedom of information laws. At least 70 public bodies in Scotland responded to the newspaper’s questions on staff awaiting redeployment, revealing that they were spending £2.3m a month between them on salaries and other employment costs. The figure does not include spending by the Scottish Government, which also refuses to make staff redundant when their job no longer exists. Its salary costs for retaining surplus civil servants were reportedly between £2m and £2.4m a year. A Scottish Government spokesman said: “Public bodies are expected to ensure that they deliver value for money and to see that all staff including those who are redeployed are engaged in appropriate work for their pay scale.” NHS Highland said it followed national policies and was “committed to supporting colleagues through periods of change”.

Read the original article on telegraph.co.uk (opens in a new tab)

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Telegraph

Everything we scored from The Telegraph