Middle East Eye, on Iran, 25 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Iran warns of ‘unimaginable’ response to as tensions rise over Hormuz

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Iran has issued a warning to the United States that any new act of militarism would lead to an "unimaginable" response, with parliament speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf saying that Iran would not back down if attacked. Addressing parliament, Qalibaf said the Iranian government would not be intimidated by US military threats or pressure and would defend what it considers the country’s territorial integrity. “Americans think that with a few levers of media pressure or military threats, they can make this great nation surrender to them,” he said, according to a report by Iran’s Tasnim news agency.

“Unaware that today's Iran is not the Iran of the Pahlavi era of humiliation, but rather an impregnable fortress of self-confidence, defensive strength and iron will,” he added. Qalibaf said Iran was prepared to respond forcefully to any violation of its territory and insisted that threats of a wider war would not compel the country to abandon its interests. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters “Until the Americans change their behaviour, stop being coercive and greedy, and compensate their violated obligations in an objective, concrete and real way on the ground, no claim for the Islamic Republic of Iran will have an iota of credibility,” Qalibaf said.

Qalibaf said Washington had placed itself in a tough spot due to its decisions to attack Iran. The warning came a day after US President Donald Trump said Washington could strike Iran as soon as Sunday or reach a “big, beautiful” agreement with Tehran, as tensions rise over the future of the Strait of Hormuz. On Sunday, Iran’s army said that its air defence systems had shot down a US LUCAS drone over Bandar Abbas, a port city in southern Iran near the Strait of Hormuz.

Gulf exports more oil than it did before Iran war despite surge in Hormuz attacks Read More » Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the war with the US and Israel means the security situation in the region has completely changed and that the management of the strait would not return to its previous state. “The current war has changed everything. We must acknowledge that new realities have emerged,” Araghchi said in remarks reported by Anadolu Agency, citing Iran’s Press TV.

“The shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz will no longer be the same as before, nor will the strait be managed as it was in the past,” he added. Araghchi said Tehran would welcome security arrangements developed by countries in the region rather than imposed by outside powers. The waterway, between Iran and Oman, is one of the most important in the world. It connects the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. Its security is crucial to international energy shipments.

Iran and the US remain at odds over how the strait should be managed following the conflict. Tehran has asserted its authority over passage through the waterway, while Washington has called for unrestricted navigation. However, although there was an interim deal signed between the two nations in June to solve the conflict, diplomatic negotiations have since stalled amid renewed tensions. Copyright © 2014 - 2026 . Middle East Eye. All rights reserved.

Only England and Wales jurisdiction apply in all legal matters. Middle East Eye ISSN 2634-2456

Read the original article on middleeasteye.net (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Middle East Eye reports Iranian parliament speaker Qalibaf's warning to the US and Foreign Minister Araghchi's remarks on Hormuz, and attributes Iranian claims to named sources and agencies. The headline puts 'US aggression' in the outlet's own voice when the body attributes the warning to Qalibaf, a minor loaded word that does not change the picture of the event.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “US aggression”

    Why this matters
    The headline uses "US aggression" outside the quotation marks, so the label reads as Middle East Eye's own description of a possible future US action.
    The impression it gives
    The outlet has itself judged any coming US move to be aggression, rather than reporting that Iran's speaker calls it that.
    The context
    The body attributes the warning to Qalibaf and words it as a response to "any new act of militarism" and to violations of Iran's territory. Other coverage also frames it as a warning about territorial violation. The verdict belongs to the speaker, and the headline drops that attribution.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “Iran’s army said that its air defence systems had shot down a US LUCAS drone over Bandar Abbas”

    The article attributes the drone claim to Iran's army rather than stating it as fact or dismissing it, and it names the place.

  • “Washington could strike Iran as soon as Sunday”

    The article sets Iran's warning against the US president's own stated threat to strike, so the reader sees what the warning answers.

  • “according to a report by Iran’s Tasnim news agency”

    The article names the source of the quotation, so the reader knows where Qalibaf's words come from.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Middle East Eye

  1. 28 OctIran rejects 'unacceptable' proposal by Qatar to end war with US3.0
  2. 27 OctOman calls for Gulf, Iraq and Iran to unite under one security pact3.0
  3. 26 OctMecca alliance visits Tehran in push to end Israeli-US war and build regional security3.0
  4. 23 Oct'Escalation is coming': Middle East on edge as new Israeli-US attack on Iran looms0.0
  5. 19 OctUAE government-linked jet lands in Tehran as regional tensions rise0.0

Everything we scored from Middle East Eye