City AM, on UK Politics, 28 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

: Britain’s biggest firms

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

Britain’s biggest businesses , a City AM analysis has found, laying bare the scale of pressure facing firms amid surging employment costs and the growing tide of automation. The analysis compiled more than 250 separate media reports of layoffs, job cuts and company administrations at major businesses since Labour took office in July 2024. It identified at least 137,000 jobs lost or announcements of planned job losses across top British companies.

That includes the likes of carmaker Jaguar Land Rover, which earlier this year said it would cut as many as 4,000 roles, as well as hospitality firm Whitbread, which axed 3,800 roles, and supermarket Sainsbury’s, which last year cut 3,000 staff. The layoffs follow a jump in employment costs over the last two years, including hikes to national insurance contributions, minimum wage rises and a tightening of employment laws. Chancellor John Healey is expected to impose another above-average increase to the minimum wage at the Budget this afternoon, piling further pressure on businesses.

Shadow chancellor Andrew Griffith told City AM : “There is a direct connection between the jobs tax and firms laying off staff. “It was entirely foreseeable that when you put up the cost and the risk of something, you’ll get less of it. ” Retail and hospitality jobs on the front line Around 30 per cent of the job losses identified came from the financial, legal and professional service sectors.

That includes the likes of Barclays, which last week said it expected to shed as many as 5,000 roles through increasing use of automation, echoing similar moves among insurance businesses and big-four accounting firms. But an even bigger share of jobs cut came from the retail and hospitality sectors, which account for around 45,000 of the job cuts identified, following thousands of shop, pub and restaurant closures over the past two years.

Official government data suggests the redundancy rate has been gradually creeping higher, from as low as two redundancies per 1,000 employees in September 2023 to as high as five in September 2025, while Google data suggests the frequency of searches for “redundancy” have doubled over the same period. The UK unemployment rate hovered around five per cent in the first half of 2026, compared to around four per cent when Labour took office, while in September, the total number of vacancies fell below 700,000 for the first time in five years.

But the bigger worry for the government has been the number of young adults who are not in work, training or education, so-called ‘Neets’, which now stands at almost 1m 16-24 year olds. “Some of that is driven by increases in the National Living Wage, increases in the NICs, which has made hiring entry-level jobs much more difficult,” said Ben Caswell, senior economist at the National Institute of Economic and Social Research. “For an entry-level worker, it was a ten per cent increase in the unit labour costs of hiring someone in just a single year.

That’s going to be a pretty big driver for reducing vacancies.” Caswell said there was no “smoking gun evidence” that AI had been a major cause the steady rise in unemployment and decline in vacancies in the UK. “It’s not like those sectors where you’d expect [AI] to be more concentrated in are the ones that are seeing the big dip in vacancies. It’s quite broad-based,” he said. Insolvency expert Molly Monks of Parker Walsh said hospitality firms had accounted for the lion’s share of companies who have approached her after struggling with a cash flow crunch.

“Profit margins are so small, and the footfall isn’t what it was, that people are just finding everything a little bit too tight – and once you slip, it’s very difficult to get back [on track] – it’s a very fast downward spiral,” she said. “Business rates and rent are really difficult. And then employees [have become] very expensive… and companies are just struggling to keep up.”

Read the original article on cityam.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

City AM's headline and opening line say Britain's biggest firms have cut more than 130,000 jobs. Its own body shows the total mixes jobs actually lost with announced plans and upper estimates. The outlet also calls this a 'Jobs apocalypse' in its own voice and gives the shadow chancellor's attack on Labour with no government reply.

  1. Uses figures that mislead

    Serious

    “cut more than 130,000 roles in two years”

    Why this matters
    The headline presents 130,000 as roles already cut.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes more than 130,000 people have already lost their jobs at big firms.
    The context
    The article's own method counts 'jobs lost or announcements of planned job losses', and several examples are plans given as maximums, such as Jaguar Land Rover's 'as many as 4,000' and Barclays' 'as many as 5,000'. The figure is a ceiling of losses and plans compiled from media reports, not a count of completed cuts.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“jobs lost or announcements of planned job losses”
    • Elsewhere in the article“said it would cut as many as 4,000 roles”
    • Elsewhere in the article“expected to shed as many as 5,000 roles”

    Show it in the article

    “have axed more than 130,000 jobs over the past two years”

    Why this matters
    The opening sentence repeats the total as jobs already 'axed', in the past tense.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the analysis as a tally of completed redundancies.
    The context
    Two sentences later the outlet says the 137,000 includes announcements of planned losses. Its examples include cuts that firms only expect to make, given as upper limits.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“announcements of planned job losses across top British companies”
    • Elsewhere in the article“last week said it expected to shed”

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Jobs apocalypse”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls the job losses an 'apocalypse' in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the labour market is in catastrophic collapse.
    The context
    The article's own data describe a redundancy rate 'gradually creeping higher' and unemployment around five per cent against around four per cent in July 2024. That is a rise, not a collapse.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the redundancy rate has been gradually creeping higher”
    • Elsewhere in the article“hovered around five per cent in the first half of 2026”

    Show it in the article

  3. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “But with almost zero business experience in the Cabinet, Labour didn’t listen.”

    Why this matters
    The shadow chancellor's attack on the Labour government ends his quoted passage, and the article gives no reply from the government or the Treasury.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is left with the opposition's case that Labour's policies caused the losses, with no answer from the government.
    The context
    The article quotes the shadow chancellor on Labour's record but carries no government or Treasury response anywhere.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “Treasury”.

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from City AM

  1. 28 OctFirms forced to give staff ‘government approved’ advice on joining a union3.0
  2. 28 OctProtecting pensioners from income tax is unfair to workers0.0
  3. 28 OctAutumn Budget 2026: five no-brainers to boost productivity0.0
  4. 28 OctIf the promise is good growth in every postcode, London can’t be an afterthought0.0
  5. 28 OctIf the Chancellor wants growth he should abolish all taxes on jobs0.0

Everything we scored from City AM