GB News, on UK Politics, 5 November 2026

8.2out of 10Serious

Migrant crisis: Andy Burnham's rejoiner dream dealt major blow as

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.6 findings

Andy Burnham's rejoiner dream dealt major blow as official figures lay bare Britain's EU migration legacy Migration from the EU represents more than half of Britain's population explosion since the year 2000 Sign up to the Membership Newsletter I agree to receive updates and information about my account, the GB News Community, and related products and services from GB News. Email address Sign up By signing up you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy and Community Rules.

Thank you for signing up! See the latest from GB News here . Choose GB News on Google - add us as a preferred source Choose GB News Support GB News Champion free speech and independent journalism while unlocking exclusive benefits. Support us Andy Burnham's dream of one day rejoining the European Union has been dealt a major blow as official figures laid bare the scale of migration from the bloc into Britain during its years as a member state.

Just days ago, the Prime Minister told ITV he wanted to see Britain return to the EU within his lifetime – and signalled Labour will fight the next general election on a platform to reverse Brexit. Mr Burnham has also said he wants to have “an honest discussion” regarding the EU's Freedom of Movement, but insisted this must rely on “a very factual, evidence-based debate". However, research of Home Office data by the Brexit Facts4EU think-tank and shared exclusively with GB News during the EU membership years.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article quotes Burnham wanting "an honest discussion" about Freedom of Movement but leaves out what he said that discussion should cover. The Express reported his point: since the Brexit vote, short-term migration from Europe has been replaced by long-term settlement in bigger numbers, "the Boriswave". Without this, a reader believes the figures rebut his argument, when he was arguing that post-Brexit migration grew.

How we know

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article says Labour signalled a platform to reverse Brexit but does not report that Burnham's own top team refused to back a return to free movement. A reader is left thinking a free movement return is Labour policy.

How we know

TRENDING Stories Videos Your Say The figures revealed . Since 2000, . Britain's population boomed by almost 10.6 million (18 per cent) in the 25 years from 2000 to 2025, .

Speaking to the People's Channel following the publishing of the shocking report, : “The fundamental objection to EU Freedom of Movement was always that it deprived the British electorate and its representatives of control over immigration policy. “Decisions about who may come to live and work in this country should be taken by ministers accountable to Parliament and the voters, not unelected European officials.”

Andy Burnham has said he wants to have 'an honest discussion' regarding the EU's Freedom of Movement | PA During the Brexit campaign, the Remain camp spearheaded by David Cameron insisted only three million EU citizens were living in Britain. However, by the EU Settlement Scheme deadline on June 30, 2021, applications had already breached six million (6,046,665), . Former secretary of state Lord Redwood told Britain's News Channel: “Because there was a surge of non-EU migrants to the UK after Brexit it has become accepted that non-EU migration has been our main problem.

“It is true the combination of special schemes for people from Hong Kong, Ukraine and a misguided care worker plan produced a surge. "Meanwhile, millions of people from the EU have been welcomed and been given residence and working rights. MIGRANT CRISIS - READ THE LATEST: Charities that lobbied against Shabana Mahmood's migration rules given more than £1bn in public cash Suspected African migrant arrested after smashing into Ramsgate Harbour during attempt to steal boat Shabana Mahmood hits back at claim Labour rebels forced £10billion immigration climbdown EU migrants represented two-thirds of the net migration influx over the past 25 years | GETTY "The totals are large and greatly exceed the non-EU numbers which we have always been able to control if we wished.

The public is so angry about the scale of this migration without thought of its impact ln communities.” Since the deadline for the EU Settlement Scheme slammed shut in July 2021, a further 1,509,639 have been submitted. While Mr Jones acknowledged the rights of EU citizens residing in Britain should be honoured, he issued a stark warning to the Prime Minister over the possibility of rejoining any freedom of movement agreement. The former Tory minister said such a move would "surrender an essential power of self-government which the British people voted to recover".

The data also revealed was heavily concentrated by just a handful of EU member states. By the EU Settlement Scheme deadline on June 30, 2021, applications had already breached the six million mark | GETTY Romania tops the table, accounting for a massive total of 1,424,187 applications approved under the settlement scheme. Poland and Italy follow closely behind with 1,183,921 and 610,344 countries, respectively.

Other countries who saw substantial numbers settle in Britain under the scheme include Bulgaria, Spain, Portugal and France. The Home Office's recently introduced automated processing measures to approve applications uses algorithms to scan continuous tax and benefits records. If the criteria are met, the software automatically upgrades the individual to settled status, with zero manual input of caseworkers required. Around 115,770 automated grants have been since the new system came into force – with 78,210 of these occurring within the last reporting year ending June 2026.

Lord Redwood said: “Many people who voted for Brexit voted to take back control of our borders. "Most were alarmed by the impact of so many people coming to live here when we were already short of homes, jobs and health care. He added: “We are not short of people. We are short of homes and jobs. Negotiating to restore Free Movement and many more EU migrants flies in the face of the Brexit vote. "It would intensify our problems with finding jobs and homes for the many already here.”

Our Standards: The GB News Editorial Charter Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Do you support Shabana Mahmood’s immigration overhaul? VOTE NOW Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Do you support Andy Burnham’s £40million aid pledge to the Caribbean? VOTE NOW Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Should Britain pay slavery reparations to Commonwealth countries? VOTE NOW Membership EXCLUSIVE OFFER: Get two free sets of cufflinks when you become a GB News Member this November Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Should trick or treat be banned over religious and cultural beliefs? - VOTE NOW Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Do you agree with John Healey that Labour is doing a good job on migration? - VOTE NOW Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Do you think you'll be better off due to John Healey's Budget? - VOTE NOW Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Is John Healey doing enough in the Budget to help with the cost of living? - VOTE NOW Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Should Andy Burnham call an early general election? - VOTE NOW Analysis Membership Not even Met Office warnings could deter the Apple faithful from queuing to spend £1,999 on its new phone Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Will you listen to the Government's advice to prepare an emergency kit? - VOTE NOW Membership Labour's attempts to coerce young people to serve their country will fall on deaf ears Membership Andy Burnham and John Healey are leaving us in the dark but there is one thing they can't bring themselves to do Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Should the UK Government temporarily ban demonstrations in the wake of the French protests?

VOTE NOW Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Should Labour go a step further and open Rosebank for drilling? - VOTE NOW Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Do you agree with Kemi Badenoch that John Healey's Budget will do more damage than Rachel Reeves's? Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Do you think Emmanuel Macron should resign over the riots in France? - VOTE NOW Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Has devolution been good for Britain? VOTE NOW Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Should foreign nationals receive benefits in Britain?

VOTE NOW Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Do you trust Andy Burnham on Brexit? VOTE NOW Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Would closer ties with the EU improve Britain’s economy? VOTE NOW Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Should Andy Burnham call a second referendum on Brexit? VOTE NOW Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Is the Green Party finished? VOTE NOW Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Should all DEI policies be scrapped immediately? VOTE NOW Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Should the Right unite?

VOTE NOW Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Should Britain spend more on defence? VOTE NOW Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Do you trust the Government to get a grip on the migration crisis? VOTE NOW Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Do you agree with Andy Burnham that Brexit has done 'more harm than good'? VOTE NOW Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Has the 'one-in, one-out' deal with France been a success? VOTE NOW Membership POLL OF THE DAY: Should Britain scrap first-past-the-post?

VOTE NOW

Read the original article on gbnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (6)

GB News headlines a pro-Brexit campaign group's reading of settlement scheme data as official figures that deal Andy Burnham a blow. It treats approved applications, which include automatic status upgrades, as if they were people arriving, and sets them against a different kind of number. It quotes Burnham's call for an honest discussion but leaves out the point he made about EU migration since Brexit, and gives the last word to two Conservative Brexit supporters.

  1. Uses figures that mislead

    Serious

    “more than 6.1 million applications under the EU Settlement Scheme have been approved, compared to 2.6 million people coming from countries outside the bloc”

    Why this matters
    Sets a count of approved applications against a count of "people coming" as if the two measure the same thing.
    The impression it gives
    That 6.1 million EU citizens arrived in Britain after 2000, against 2.6 million from elsewhere.
    The context
    An approval is not an arrival. The article itself says the software "automatically upgrades the individual to settled status", so one person can account for more than one grant. Nothing in the article shows these approvals are arrivals since 2000 or that anyone who left has been subtracted.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the software automatically upgrades the individual to settled status”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Around 115,770 automated grants have been dished out”

    Show it in the article

    “migrants who came into Britain from the EU represented two-thirds of the net migration influx over the past 25 years”

    Why this matters
    Calls a share of application approvals a share of "net migration".
    The impression it gives
    That two-thirds of net migration over 25 years came from the EU.
    The context
    Net migration subtracts those who leave. The only figures the article offers are applications approved, which count no departures at all. The share rests on comparing approvals with a different kind of number.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“more than 6.1 million applications under the EU Settlement Scheme have been approved”

    Show it in the article

    “with migration from the EU accounting for more than half of the unprecedented rise”

    Why this matters
    Gives a second, different share for EU migration in the same piece.
    The impression it gives
    That the EU share of growth is a settled, precise figure.
    The context
    S10 says two-thirds of net migration and S12 says more than half of population growth. The article never explains how either figure is calculated from settlement applications.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“represented two-thirds of the net migration influx”

    Show it in the article

    “which is double the number initially presented by the Remain side”

    Why this matters
    Compares a count of applications with an estimate of residents and calls the gap a doubling.
    The impression it gives
    That the Remain side hid half of the EU citizens living in Britain.
    The context
    Applications are not residents. The article itself shows applications kept arriving long after the deadline, and that grants include automatic upgrades for people already counted. A tally of applications cannot show how many people were living here in 2016.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“a further 1,509,639 have been submitted”
    • Elsewhere in the article“insisted only three million EU citizens were living in Britain”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Brexit Facts4EU, a pro-Brexit group, counted more than 6.1 million approved applications under the EU Settlement Scheme. Approvals include status upgrades and do not measure arrivals or net migration.

  2. Headline goes beyond the article

    Serious

    “official figures lay bare Britain's EU legacy”

    Why this matters
    Calls the numbers "official figures" and states the conclusion as the outlet's own.
    The impression it gives
    That government statistics have themselves shown this legacy.
    The context
    The body says the analysis is "research of Home Office data by the Brexit Facts4EU think-tank". The headline drops that attribution and presents one group's reading of the data as an official finding.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“research of Home Office data by the Brexit Facts4EU think-tank”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Pro-Brexit group's analysis of settlement scheme data claims EU migration drove most population growth since 2000.

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    The article quotes Burnham wanting "an honest discussion" about Freedom of Movement but leaves out what he said that discussion should cover. The Express reported his point: since the Brexit vote, short-term migration from Europe has been replaced by long-term settlement in bigger numbers, "the Boriswave". Without this, a reader believes the figures rebut his argument, when he was arguing that post-Brexit migration grew.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  4. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “has revealed the damning legacy of migration into Britain”

    Why this matters
    Calls the legacy "damning" in the outlet's own voice.
    The impression it gives
    That the figures prove EU migration was a harm.
    The context
    The figures are counts of applications. Any verdict on them belongs to the quoted politicians, not the reporter.

    Show it in the article

    “the staggering migrant influx”

    Why this matters
    Adds "staggering" and "influx" to describe EU citizens settling legally.
    The impression it gives
    That this was an alarming flood.
    The context
    The article reports lawful settlement under a government scheme. The emotive words are the outlet's own.

    Show it in the article

    “dished out”

    Why this matters
    Describes lawful grants of status as being "dished out".
    The impression it gives
    That status is handed over carelessly.
    The context
    S30 says grants are made only "If the criteria are met".

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“If the criteria are met”

    Show it in the article

  5. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “former Brexit Minister David Jones said”

    Why this matters
    Opens the quoted reaction with a former Conservative Brexit minister. The second voice is another Conservative Brexit supporter.
    The impression it gives
    That the figures speak for themselves against Burnham.
    The context
    Burnham appears only as two short fragments. No Labour voice and no migration statistician is quoted, and Lord Redwood's claims about homes and jobs end the article unanswered.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Former secretary of state Lord Redwood told”

    Show it in the article

  6. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article says Labour signalled a platform to reverse Brexit but does not report that Burnham's own top team refused to back a return to free movement. A reader is left thinking a free movement return is Labour policy.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from GB News

  1. 5 NovLabour apologises to young Ukrainian refugees after 'pushing' them to learn Russian0.0
  2. 5 NovApprentices dropping out of courses due to 'box-ticking' and 'weak' management0.0
  3. 5 NovAngus MacIntyre: Nigel Farage appoints Troubles veteran who braved 'most dangerous posting for British Army' as Reform's defence chief3.0
  4. 4 NovMillions could face higher gas bills to cover cost of neighbours switching to heat pumps6.0
  5. 4 NovPOLL OF THE DAY: Do you support Shabana Mahmood’s immigration overhaul? VOTE NOW0.0

Everything we scored from GB News