Tehran Times, on West Bank, 25 October 2026

The Tehran Times reports Israel's siege of al-Khalil (Hebron) and names Israeli forces as the actor throughout. But it calls the checkpoint shooting that set off the siege "a resistance operation" in its own voice, states that Ben-Gvir and Katz publicly touted the expulsions with no quotation or source, and writes of "mass arrests" across "more than 400 sites" in 24 hours when prisoner organisations counted 50 to 70 people arrested. It also never tells readers that the two Palestinian attackers were shot dead.

3.0

Minor

out of 10

What we found

  1. Uses figures that mislead

    Minor

    “Mass arrests have swept through more than 400 sites in a single 24-hour period, according to local prisoner groups”

    What the words do
    The words "mass arrests" and "more than 400 sites in a single 24-hour period" put a four-figure scale on the detention campaign and credit it to prisoner groups.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That Palestinian prisoner organisations recorded hundreds of arrests across al-Khalil in one day.
    What is actually the case
    The prisoner organisations quoted in other reporting on the same siege counted around 70 Palestinians arrested over Friday and Saturday, and 50 since Friday. The article's figure counts locations, not people, but is written under the words "mass arrests" so the reader takes it as a count of detentions.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “a resistance operation”

    What the words do
    The phrase "a resistance operation" gives the outlet's own name to the shooting at the checkpoint near al-Khalil.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the killing of the two soldiers has an agreed character the article has established.
    What is actually the case
    The article gives no basis for the label beyond the fact of the shooting. Reporting on the same event describes two Palestinians opening fire at a military checkpoint at the city entrance; the outlet supplies the verdict itself.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Asserts what named ministers said with nothing to back it

    Minor

    “Far-right ministers such as Itamar Ben-Gvir and Israel Katz have openly touted the displacement of al-Khalil’s population as proof of military resolve”

    What the words do
    The sentence states that two named ministers publicly boasted about the expulsions, with no quotation, date or source.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That both named ministers have been recorded publicly celebrating the expulsions.
    What is actually the case
    Coverage of this siege records Katz acknowledging the displacement and announcing plans for it; nothing in the article or in the coverage records any statement by Ben-Gvir on al-Khalil.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  4. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article says only that the operation followed a shooting that killed two Israeli soldiers. It never says that the two Palestinians who carried out the shooting were themselves shot dead, reported on the same event by other outlets. Without it a reader believes nobody on the Palestinian side was killed in the incident that set off the siege.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

Israel seizes civilian houses in al-Khalil, establishes frontline military posts

Israel seizes civilian houses in al-Khalil, establishes frontline military posts

TEHRAN — Israeli forces have sealed every major entry point into al-Khalil (Hebron), driving more than 2,200 Palestinians out of their homes and transforming entire residential quarters into military barracks.

The punitive siege, ordered directly by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu following on Friday that killed two Israeli soldiers at a nearby checkpoint, has paralyzed the governorate of nearly 800,000 residents.

Municipal leadership in al-Khalil declared the city a disaster zone after troops moved systematically through neighborhoods including al-Jalda, Ein Deir Baha, Khallat Manna, and Dahiyat al-Zaytoun, forcing families out at gunpoint.

The mechanics of this latest aggression follow a pattern perfected by the Israeli army across the northern West Bank.

Soldiers give residents minutes to gather basic belongings before bulldozing storefronts, knocking down outer walls, and stringing razor wire across residential streets.

Over 490 housing units spanning roughly 350 dunams have been commandeered or targeted for clearing, with municipal officials warning that expulsion orders could soon reach 2,500 additional residents.

Concurrently, Israeli forces shut down the historic Ibrahimi Mosque, barring Muslim custodians and worshippers while suspending the call to prayer across the Old City.

, leaving schools closed and municipal services unable to clear accumulating waste beyond the military perimeter.

The timing of this campaign coincides with intense domestic political maneuvering ahead of Israel’s upcoming parliamentary vote.

.

Local Palestinian officials and experts point out Netanyahu’s cabinet’s use of collective punishment and the desecration of holy sites as a brutal campaign stunt to secure nationalist votes.

Meanwhile, on the agricultural front across the West Bank, regime-backed Israeli settler rampages have damaged nearly 300,000 olive trees since last year, turning the traditional harvest season into another front of land theft and displacement.

Read the original article on tehrantimes.com (opens in a new tab)

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Tehran Times

Everything we scored from Tehran Times