The Guardian, on Iran, 26 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

High-level delegation visits Iran to try to avert flare-up with US and Israel

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

High-level diplomatic delegations from Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan have travelled to Tehran in an attempt to prevent renewed fighting between Iran and the US and Israel as rhetoric sharpens on both sides . Security officials and diplomats at Monday’s meeting were expected to discuss how Iran could persuade the Houthis in Yemen to end their crippling missile and drone attacks on infrastructure in Saudi Arabia . With fighting raging across Yemen, the Houthis claimed to have closed Riyadh airport and inflicted heavy damage on the Saudi economy.

The officials were also understood to be discussing Iran’s possible inclusion in a new security pact involving Islamic countries. The Saudi defence minister, Khalid bin Salman, Pakistan’s army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, and the head of Turkey’s intelligence service, Ibrahim Kalın, were to meet Iran’s top security officials and negotiators to push for a deal between Tehran and Washington. The three countries signed a defence agreement in Mecca in August.

Some in Iran feared the deal was constructed to challenge Tehran, but the signatory countries have insisted it is simply a mutual defence pact. The balance between exploring a new long-term security architecture and demanding Iran start to compromise in the conflicts in which it is engaged will be critical. It is possible the two sides came to the meeting with different priorities. View image in fullscreen The Saudi defence minister, Khalid bin Salman, meeting Pakistan’s Field Marshal Asim Munir in Riyadh in September.

Photograph: Saudi Press Agency/Reuters The Iranian foreign ministry has often proposed a security pact for the region in which Iran, as opposed to the US, plays a role, and the US-Iran conflict has potentially reopened the debate among Gulf states about whether the heavy presence of US bases in their countries is a source of reassurance or insecurity. Oman is one Gulf state to have explored a regional security pact that includes Iran. No Gulf state openly supported the US-Israeli attack on Iran either last year or this February, but some have covertly cooperated in the operations.

Iran has sought to defend itself by attacking US bases and energy infrastructure in the Gulf states. Iran’s foreign ministry spokesperson, Esmaeil Baghaei, said the meeting could pave the way for broader regional cooperation on security based on shared interest. Iran threatens to strike oil and AI facilities across Gulf if US and Israel renew attacks Read more “The events of the last two years, especially the past eight months, have shown that sustainable and reliable security in our region will only be possible by building trust and cooperation among the countries of the region,” he said.

Javad Zarif, a former foreign minister and long-term advocate of a regional security alliance called for “a comprehensive regional network based on non-aggression, mutual trust building, and shared prosperity”. “Regional security is not imported, it must be created by the people of this very region together,” he said. He published his message alongside an image of verses 103 and 159 from Surah Ali ‘Imran, the third chapter of the Qur’an.

The verses emphasise being saved from a fiery pit by avoiding division, fostering unity, seeking forgiveness and consulting others. The meeting takes place against a backdrop of continued Pentagon briefings about a major US military buildup in preparation for a possible assault after the midterm elections. Qatari mediators, it was confirmed, spent much of Sunday in Tehran seeking terms for Iran to reopen the strait of Hormuz. Israeli media reports claimed the country’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has been trying to browbeat the military into provoking a war with Iran before the Israeli elections on Tuesday.

Donald Trump’s repeated call for Netanyahu to be re-elected only adds to the mood in the region that modern-day US and Israel have the potential to be a long-term source of insecurity in the region. The idea of a security pact with Iran will be resisted in large parts of the Middle East after the damage Tehran has been prepared to inflict on the economies of the region, .

Iranian hardliners also increasingly argue Iran’s security best lies in trying to assemble a nuclear bomb, ending the fatwa on the possession of a weapon of mass destruction. A pact likely to take many months to negotiate may also not be a solution to Washington’s demand that Iran reopen the strait of Hormuz before US sanctions are lifted. Explore more on these topics Iran US-Israel war on Iran Saudi Arabia Pakistan Turkey Middle East and north Africa news Share Reuse this content

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article ends on Washington's demand that Iran reopen the strait of Hormuz before sanctions are lifted. It never reports Iran's own stated conditions, given to Reuters the same day: lifting the US blockade of Iranian ports, easing oil sanctions and ending hostilities, with no nuclear talks until these are met. Without them a reader takes Hormuz as a one-sided obstacle and never learns of the US blockade.

How we know

Read the original article on theguardian.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Guardian reports the Saudi, Turkish and Pakistani delegation to Tehran fairly on most points, naming the US-Israeli attack on Iran and attributing contested claims. In its own voice, though, it calls the Houthis Tehran's intermediaries, presenting Iran as the author of Houthi attacks with no source. It closes on Washington's demand over Hormuz and leaves out Iran's stated conditions, including the lifting of the US blockade of Iranian ports.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “either directly or through the use of intermediaries such as the Houthis”

    Why this matters
    The words "through the use of intermediaries such as the Houthis" state in the outlet's own voice that the Houthis act on Tehran's behalf, and count their attacks on Gulf economies as damage Tehran inflicted.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away believing that Iran directs the Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabia and that the Houthis are Iran's instrument.
    The context
    The article gives no source for this. Its own S2 frames the Houthis as a separate actor that Iran would have to persuade. Other outlets describe them as "Iran-backed", which is a different claim from being Iran's intermediaries. The brief asks that Iran-aligned groups be named as themselves, with any link to Iran reported as a sourced fact.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article ends on Washington's demand that Iran reopen the strait of Hormuz before sanctions are lifted. It never reports Iran's own stated conditions, given to Reuters the same day: lifting the US blockade of Iranian ports, easing oil sanctions and ending hostilities, with no nuclear talks until these are met. Without them a reader takes Hormuz as a one-sided obstacle and never learns of the US blockade.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Guardian

Everything we scored from The Guardian

See how 112 outlets covered this story