The Scotsman, on UK Politics, 26 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

SNP ministers were warned

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

SNP ministers were warned a slump in oil and gas investment risked driving the renewable energy supply chain out of Scotland, new documents have revealed. The Scottish government was also warned that Scotland's forecast share of ScotWind manufacturing expenditure has fallen from 27 per cent in 2023 to 20 per cent in 2026. The revelation comes as the SNP government comes under pressure from the fossil fuel industry and political rivals to back new oil and gas projects in the North Sea after the party voted at its annual conference to scrap the controversial “presumption against” new developments.

SNP energy minister Stephen Gethins told The Scotsman it could be another year before an official position on oil and gas is confirmed by the Scottish government in its much-delayed energy strategy. But the Scottish government is also facing pressure from climate campaigners calling on SNP ministers to oppose the Rosebank oil field, which would produce around 200 million tonnes of carbon if approved for environmental consent by the UK government and which received a permit last week.

New documents have revealed a risk register presented by industry body, Scottish Renewables, in January warned of a major threat to offshore wind development. The organisation stated that “historic lows in O&G investment” were “driving supply chains out of Scotland” and having “impacts on operational renewables too.” The document warned over a “genuine challenge to meet grid build out”. The warning was delivered directly to senior ministers at a meeting of the national strategy for economic transformation delivery board, co-chaired by then deputy first minister Kate Forbes and attended by then net zero secretary Màiri McAllan, who is now John Swinney’s education secretary.

The documents show the renewables industry concerns over Scotland's existing energy supply chain that could be undermined before offshore wind projects are able to replace lost work. Separate correspondence released by Crown Estate Scotland also shows Scotland's forecast share of ScotWind manufacturing expenditure has fallen from 27 per cent in 2023 to 20 per cent in 2026. Officials pointed to changes in project assumptions and the increasing use of international suppliers as projects developed.

It comes after The Scotsman revealed that floating ScotWind developers are poised to hand their contracts back to Crown Estate Scotland as the industry rallies around a handful of projects to get them up and running amid fears over investment for the emerging technology. Scottish Conservative energy spokesman, Liam Kerr, said: “These documents contain a stark warning from Scotland's renewable energy industry itself. “Ministers knew in January that the SNP’s presumption against new oil and gas, and the chilling effect that has had on investment in the North Sea, has actively hampered the development of new industry.

READ MORE: North Sea chief demands action from Andy Burnham to open 'bigger pipeline' of oil and gas projects “No wonder the so-called ‘just transition’ they repeatedly promised just hasn’t transpired for thousands of workers who have lost their jobs.” He added: “When even Scottish Renewables are telling Kate Forbes and Mairi McAllan their cliff-edge approach to developments like Rosebank and Cambo isn’t working, that tells you something.

“But John Swinney still hasn’t backed Rosebank, he hasn’t changed SNP policy and the Scottish Government’s energy strategy is now three and a half years overdue. “The SNP now need to explain what action they took over this warning, how they are protecting Scotland's energy supply chain and how they will stop a just transition becoming a transition out of Scotland.” Energy minister Stephen Gethins said: “The decisions around Jackdaw and Rosebank were delayed because the consent process was found by the courts to be flawed.

It is important that the UK Government learns from that process. “We need to see a parallel track approach to the energy transition, in which North Sea oil and gas production is managed alongside the increasing deployment of renewables. We are clear that in addition to replacing the Energy Profits Levy, the UK Government must make decisions on North Sea oil and gas projects on a case by case basis, with climate compatibility as required by law and energy security as key considerations.

And it is absolutely critical that if any new production goes ahead, then the economic benefits should be felt in Scotland, rather than flowing to the Treasury. “Scotland has been world leading in its deployment of renewables including in our offshore wind sector. However, the biggest threat to Scotland's offshore wind supply chain is uncertainty and UK policies that undermine the sector. The UK Government must reform unfair transmission charging and ensure the Strategic Spatial Energy Plan fully reflects Scotland’s offshore wind pipeline.

Failure to do so risks investment, jobs and supply chain growth.” SNP energy minister, Stephen Gethins, said: “The decisions around Jackdaw and Rosebank were delayed because the consent process was found by the courts to be flawed. It is important that the UK Government learns from that process. “We need to see a parallel track approach to the energy transition, in which North Sea oil and gas production is managed alongside the increasing deployment of renewables.

We are clear that in addition to replacing the energy profits levy, the UK government must make decisions on North Sea oil and gas projects on a case by case basis, with climate compatibility as required by law and energy security as key considerations. And it is absolutely critical that if any new production goes ahead, then the economic benefits should be felt in Scotland, rather than flowing to the Treasury. “Scotland has been world leading in its deployment of renewables including in our offshore wind sector.

However, the biggest threat to Scotland's offshore wind supply chain is uncertainty and UK policies that undermine the sector. The UK government must reform unfair transmission charging and ensure the strategic spatial energy plan fully reflects Scotland’s offshore wind pipeline. Failure to do so risks investment, jobs and supply chain growth.”

Read the original article on scotsman.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Scotsman reports that an industry risk register warned SNP ministers that low oil and gas investment was driving supply chains out of Scotland. Its headline stretches that into renewables investment leaving Scotland, which the quoted document does not say. The article also states in its own voice that Rosebank has no energy security argument, without saying who makes that case.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “oil and gas slump driving renewables investment out of Scotland”

    Why this matters
    The headline says the warning was that renewables investment is being driven out of Scotland.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Scottish Renewables told ministers that investment in renewables is leaving Scotland because of the oil and gas slump.
    The context
    The document the article quotes says low oil and gas investment was driving supply chains out of Scotland, with impacts on operational renewables too. The article itself describes the concern as being about the existing energy supply chain. Nothing quoted says renewables investment is leaving.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article““historic lows in O&G investment” were “driving supply chains out of Scotland””
    • Elsewhere in the article“Scotland's existing energy supply chain that could be undermined before offshore wind projects are able to replace lost work”

    Show it in the article

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “has no energy security argument like the Jackdaw gas field”

    Why this matters
    The Scotsman states in its own voice that Rosebank has no energy security argument, with no one named as saying so.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as settled that Rosebank offers no energy security case.
    The context
    Whether Rosebank has an energy security case is disputed: the article reports the fossil fuel industry and political rivals pressing ministers to back new North Sea projects, and Liam Kerr pressing Swinney to back Rosebank. The claim belongs to one side and should be attributed.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“under pressure from the fossil fuel industry and political rivals to back new oil and gas projects”
    • Elsewhere in the article“John Swinney still hasn’t backed Rosebank”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Scotsman

  1. 26 OctMairi McAllan: Providing P1 children with free school bags will cost £2.7m0.0
  2. 26 OctBus passenger numbers plummet since SNP took power as Swinney urged to allow public ownership6.0
  3. 26 OctLet's hope for a Budget which delivers real help - and no pasty tax please0.0
  4. 26 Oct‘Show intent’ to end homelessness by scrapping benefits cap, charities urge0.0
  5. 26 OctBudget 2026: What will be in John Healey’s first Budget as Chancellor0.0

Everything we scored from The Scotsman