The Jerusalem Post, on Gaza, 4 November 2026

8.7out of 10Severe

IDF, Shin Bet from three separate organizations in strikes near Khan Yunis

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

The IDF and Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) in a series of strikes earlier this week, including Gamal Abu Said, who held Omar Shem Tov hostage in Gaza, . As part of his duties, he was responsible for training military operatives outside the Gaza Strip, served as commander of an anti-tank battalion, and was responsible for military specializations in the Central Camps Brigade, the IDF said.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says these strikes took place during a declared ceasefire. The Post's own earlier reporting described IOF troops deployed under the ceasefire agreement, and the same-day army statement refers to the ceasefire. Without this, a reader believes these killings are routine acts of active war, not lethal strikes carried out while a ceasefire is in force.

How we know

Abu Said was also instrumental in Hamas's connection with various countries and was a significant source of knowledge for the terror group. In two strikes on Monday, the IDF and Shin Bet killed Mahmoud Jihad Mohammad Qafa and Asaad Suleiman Salman Qashta in the area of Khan Yunis. Qafa served as the head of a sniper cell in Hamas' military wing, while Qashta was a member of Jaish al-Islam (Army of Islam).On Sunday, the IDF and Shin Bet and one Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) member also in the area of Khan Yunis.Mohammad Zakaria Al-Jamal, Shaher Mohammad Zaarab, and Mohammad Amin Al-Namas all served in Hamas's military wing.

Al-Jamal was the head of a cell, and Zaarab served as a Nukhba Company Commander.The fourth terrorist killed on Sunday, Mohammad Ali Abu Shaar, was a PIJ sniper.October 7 Nir Oz infiltrator among four Hamas terrorists killed in IDF strikesOn Monday, the IDF announced it killed four Hamas terrorists, including one who invaded Israeli territory on October 7, 2023, in a series of weekend strikes in Gaza.In a strike in the southern Gazan city of Khan Younis, , who infiltrated Kibbutz Nir Oz during the October 7 massacre and oversaw the preparation and training of Hamas's Nukhba forces.

In another strike in the area of Nuseirat in central Gaza, the IDF killed Diaa Abd al-Mohsen Muhammad Abu al-Rous, another Nukhba terrorist in Hamas's military wing. In the northern Gaza Strip, the IDF killed Nabil Hamad, a senior member of Hamas's military recruitment framework, and Mohannad Nader Mahmoud Dahdouh, a sniper commander who the military said had been actively involved in combat against Israeli troops.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

The Jerusalem Post calls every person Israeli occupation forces killed a terrorist in its own voice, and its only basis is the IOF and Shin Bet announcements. It states the army's account of one dead man's Hamas career as fact, and gives no Palestinian voice. It never tells the reader the strikes took place during a declared ceasefire.

  1. Labels people on one side's word

    Severe

    “kill six terrorists”

    Why this matters
    The headline calls the dead "terrorists" in the outlet's own voice, with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established fact that every person killed was a terrorist.
    The context
    The only source for who these men were is the joint IOF and Shin Bet announcement. The article names no independent basis and no Palestinian source.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “killed seven terrorists operating in the Gaza Strip”

    Why this matters
    The opening sentence repeats the label as the outlet's own description of the dead. It puts the attribution only on the announcement, not on the label.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the Post has established that seven terrorists were killed.
    The context
    Everything the article knows about these men comes from the army's statement, which the Post cites elsewhere as the source.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“military specializations in the Central Camps Brigade, the IDF said”

    Show it in the article

    “killed three Hamas terrorists”

    Why this matters
    The Post labels the men killed on Sunday "Hamas terrorists" in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes their identity and status as checked fact.
    The context
    The wording copies the army's own statement, as the same-day Israel National News report shows. The Post adds no basis of its own.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “Israeli forces killed Nukhba terrorist Muhammad Kamel Masleh Qadih”

    Why this matters
    The Post names a dead man with the label "Nukhba terrorist" fixed to his name. It states his alleged role on 7 October as fact.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the man's role and actions as proven.
    The context
    Elsewhere the Post attributes such descriptions to the military. This one rests on the same army announcement and carries no attribution.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“who the military said had been actively involved”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli occupation forces and the Shin Bet said they killed seven men in strikes in Gaza this week, whom they described as members of armed groups; the claims could not be independently checked.

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “Abu Said has held several senior positions in Hamas.”

    Why this matters
    The Post states the army's account of the dead man's career in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes his Hamas career as established by the newspaper.
    The context
    The same description appears in the IOF and Shin Bet statement carried by Israel National News. The Post attributes the next sentence to the army but not this one.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “the two announced on Wednesday”

    Why this matters
    The Post builds the whole report on the IOF and Shin Bet announcement.
    The impression it gives
    A reader gets only the killers' account of who died and why.
    The context
    No family, witness, Gaza health authority or other Palestinian voice appears anywhere in the article.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “family”, “health” and “witness”.

    Show it in the article

  4. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says these strikes took place during a declared ceasefire. The Post's own earlier reporting described IOF troops deployed under the ceasefire agreement, and the same-day army statement refers to the ceasefire. Without this, a reader believes these killings are routine acts of active war, not lethal strikes carried out while a ceasefire is in force.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 3 NovReported forced and child marriages in Gaza surged 120% in early 2026, UN says3.0
  2. 3 NovTel Aviv University unveils October 7 memorial honoring victims of attack0.0
  3. 3 NovMultiple IDF soldiers indicted for conduct in Gaza, Military Advocate General announces7.3
  4. 3 NovDocumentary exposing UNRWA corruption, Hamas involvement, screened for United Nations diplomats7.3
  5. 3 NovIsrael to file UEFA complaint against Ireland over coach's 'genocide' remarks3.0

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post