Reuters, on West Bank, 3 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Israeli ex-generals condemn settler violence, help Palestinian farmers

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Item 1 of 3 Israeli activists and Palestinians prepare to have a meal during the olive harvest season in Palestinian-owned olive groves in the village of Qusra, near Nablus, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, November 3, 2026. REUTERS/Mohamad Torokman [1/3] Israeli activists and Palestinians prepare to have a meal during the olive harvest season in Palestinian-owned olive groves in the village of Qusra, near Nablus, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank,...

Purchase Licensing Rights , opens new tab Read more QUSRA, West Bank, Nov 3 (Reuters) - A group of senior Israeli ex-military officials helped Palestinian farmers on Tuesday to harvest olives, in a gesture of solidarity amid an upsurge in militant settler violence targeting Palestinians in the occupied West ​Bank. "When I see what is going on here, when I see these guys come... and hit women ‌and kids, it reminds me of stories from my parents from the time when the Jewish people suffered," said former Major General Eyal Ben-Reuven, who compared the militant settler attacks to pogroms.

Sign up here. Ben-Reuven said he began organizing a group of around 30 senior military officials — including six ​generals — several months ago following an increase in settler violence that many Palestinians say is enabled by the ​Israeli military. The Israeli military has said it condemns violence and it operates to maintain security in ⁠the West Bank. "Occupation is the main problem of Israeli society. I believe we must deal with it, we cannot ignore ​it.

We must try to solve it together with the Palestinians," said former Colonel Doron Meinert. Ben-Reuven and others said they ​were also concerned about the impact of settler violence on Israel's global reputation. "Strategically, tactically, it's creating problems for the state of Israel in the West and the United States," said Jonatan Yoni, a former brigadier general, who said he was also motivated by the plight of Palestinian ​farmers and by opposition to Israeli annexation of the West Bank. 'THE ARMY IS PROTECTING THE SETTLERS' Nimr Nazzal, the owner of ​land near the village of Qusra where the ex-military personnel were helping out, said that without them it would be impossible for ‌him to ⁠access his olives due to settler attacks.

He added that many of the settler attacks had the support of the Israeli military. "The army is protecting the settlers," said Nazzal. The Israeli rights group Yesh Din has reported 180 physical attacks on Palestinian olive harvesters over the 35 days since the season began. The Israeli military was present in more than 23% of the ​cases of settler violence it recorded, ​Yesh Din said. Palestinians ⁠say that when they call the Israeli military, it either responds late or comes to the aid of the settlers perpetrating the violence.

The military denies this. Meinert, who now dedicates much ​of his time to volunteering in the West Bank in support of Palestinians, also ​said that the ⁠Israeli army aided the settlers. Some Israeli soldiers, Meinert added, share the militant settlers' belief that only Jews "have the right to this area and that the Arabs should be expelled or stay here as second (class) residents". The Israeli military has said in the past ⁠it is ​the people's army and reflects the full spectrum of views in Israeli ​society.

The West Bank is home to some 500,000 settlers and at least 3 million Palestinians. under ​international law regarding military occupations. Reporting by Pesha Magid Editing by Gareth Jones Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. , opens new tab Suggested Topics: Middle East X Facebook Linkedin Email Link Purchase Licensing Rights

Read the original article on reuters.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Reuters reports Israeli ex-generals helping Palestinian farmers at Qusra, names settlers as the attackers and gives space to Palestinian and Yesh Din evidence of army involvement. It closes by presenting the illegality of the settlements as the view of UN bodies and most countries, then gives Israel's claim that the territory is disputed the last word. A reader leaves unaware that the International Court of Justice has already ruled on both points.

  1. Hedges the documented record

    Serious

    “UN bodies and most countries deem the settlements illegal”

    Why this matters
    Reuters writes the illegality of the settlements as something UN bodies and most countries "deem", an opinion held by some parties, and never mentions the court ruling.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the settlements' legal status is a matter of opinion among governments, still open to dispute.
    The context
    The International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found the settlements illegal and the occupation unlawful. This is settled record, not one side's view, and the article never names the court.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “unlawful” and “court”.

    Show it in the article

    “Israel rejects this, viewing the territory as disputed rather than occupied.”

    Why this matters
    Reuters ends the article on Israel's claim that the territory is "disputed rather than occupied", with nothing after it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is left with two equal positions on whether the West Bank is occupied, with Israel's having the final say.
    The context
    The ICJ found the occupation of the West Bank unlawful. Reuters itself calls the land the "Israeli-occupied West Bank" elsewhere, yet lets the contested claim close the piece unanswered.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Elsewhere in the article“in the Israeli-occupied West Bank”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The International Court of Justice ruled in July 2024 that Israel's occupation of the West Bank is unlawful and its settlements illegal under international law. Israel rejects the ruling.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Reuters

  1. 30 OctIsrael demolishes gunmen's homes in West Bank operation that has displaced thousands3.0
  2. 27 OctPalestinians protest against military demolitions in West Bank as Israelis vote8.0
  3. 24 OctFive Italian activists held in West Bank have been repatriated, ministry says3.0
  4. 23 OctItaly calls for release of five activists held by Israel in West Bank3.0
  5. 22 OctIsrael frees from custody almost all suspects in two settler attacks, puts them under house arrest6.0

Everything we scored from Reuters