A resident of Mazra’a in northern Israel has been charged with spying for Iran after allegedly contacting Iranian intelligence operatives and offering to photograph military and civilian sites in exchange for money. According to the allegations, Wissam Awad, 50, approached the operatives through Telegram, motivated by a desire to seek revenge for Israel’s actions in Gaza. Awad allegedly filmed the road leading to Camp Shraga and its entrance on his own initiative, saying in the recording: “This is the base you’re firing missiles and drones at.”
He later used a satellite image to confirm the base’s identity to his handler. Despite being instructed not to undertake assignments independently, Awad allegedly went on to photograph the Nahariya police station, including an anti-drone defense system installed above the building. After telling his handler that he worked in Zar’it near a military facility, Awad was asked to photograph the outpost. He allegedly traveled to the site and shared his location but did not take pictures because soldiers and security cameras were present.
Ex-spy Jonathan Pollard says US-Israel alliance is 'finished' The allegations also include photographing a medical device manufacturing plant in Nahariya and marking its location on a map. Awad was further tasked with watching for unusual movements of Israeli forces northward along Routes 4 and 70 that could signal preparations for a ground operation in Lebanon. He allegedly told his handler that military vehicles regularly traveled along Route 4.
Suggested articles Nvidia CEO admits to second affair with senior employee, as board prepares to oust him - report | i24NEWS US soldier arrested in UK on suspicion of spying for Russia | i24NEWS Israeli soldier charged with passing sensitive military information to Iranian operatives | i24NEWS
i24News reports that a resident of Mazra'a has been charged with spying for Iran and mostly marks the prosecution's case as allegation. In a few sentences the outlet drops that marker and states the indictment's account as established fact. It gives the reader only the charging side, with no word from the accused or his lawyer.
States one side's claim as fact
Minor
“He later used a satellite image to confirm the base’s identity to his handler.”
Why this matters
The outlet states in its own voice, with no "allegedly", that Awad used a satellite image and that he had a "handler".
The impression it gives
A reader takes it as established that Awad was run by an Iranian handler and confirmed a military target for him.
The context
This is part of the charge against a man who has not been tried. Elsewhere the article marks the same account as allegation, so here the attribution is simply dropped.
How we know
Elsewhere in the article“According to the allegations, Wissam Awad”
Elsewhere in the article“Awad allegedly filmed the road”