Sky News, on UK Politics, 23 October 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

Three people linked to Conservatives sentenced after cheating at gambling on general election

No framing issues found.

Three people linked to the Conservatives, including the party's former director of campaigning, have been given suspended sentences after admitting to cheating at gambling on the 2024 general election date. <p>Anthony Lee, 49, <a href="https://news.sky.com/story/conservative-couple-admit-cheating-at-gambling-over-election-betting-charges-13583961" target="_blank"><strong>pleaded guilty in September</strong></a> alongside his wife, Laura Saunders, 38, who appeared in court under her married name.</p><p>Lee was responsible for deploying Tory resources for the contest, which <a href="https://news.sky.com/topic/rishi-sunak-8527/1" target="_self"><strong>then-prime minister Rishi Sunak</strong></a> called for 4 July.</p><p>Saunders was the party's head of international, based at head office and had been chosen to run in the Bristol North West constituency.</p><p>NHS worker Amy Hind, 36, the wife of Conservative deputy digital director Anthony Hind, pleaded guilty in June to cheating on the date of the election.</p><p>In a hearing at Southwark Crown Court, Lee was handed a suspended sentence of 10 months and two weeks in prison for each of his two counts, while Saunders was given a suspended sentence of four weeks and two months.

Hind was given six months in prison, also suspended.</p><p>All three were also ordered to complete unpaid work, while Lee and Saunders were told to pay compensation totalling more than £10,000.</p><p>They were all charged after an investigation found inside information on the date of the <a href="https://news.sky.com/topic/general-election-2024-11175/1" target="_self"><strong>2024 general election</strong></a> had been used to place bets.</p><p>Judge Tony Baumgartner said at the sentencing that Lee and Saunders placed bets worth more than £2,000 on the date of the election - which would have generated returns of more than £23,000 if the cheating had not been uncovered.</p><widget id="3"></widget><p>Hind placed four bets and attempted to make a further three in accounts "opened specifically for the purposes of cheating", the judge said.</p><p>Had all seven of her attempts succeeded and gone unnoticed, the return would have been just over £26,000.</p><p>Hind had placed more than 3,000 online bets over the years but the ones she put on the election date "were a clear departure from your previous betting history", the judge told her.

Hind's previous betting was mostly on sports, he added.</p> <widget id="4"></widget><p>Lee, a key Tory figure, was aware of a Downing Street meeting to discuss possible election dates on 10 March 2024, almost two weeks before the scheduled date was announced.</p><p>As the meeting unfolded, Lee and his wife - who were not in attendance - began betting on when the election would be held, the court heard.</p><p>"The overwhelming inference is that Anthony Lee was receiving inside information as the meeting went on and was acting upon it," the prosecution said.</p><p>Lee was also involved in email correspondence including one chain titled "Crazy idea: Campaign discussion", the court was told.</p>

Read the original article on news.sky.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

Sky News reports the suspended sentences given at Southwark Crown Court to Anthony Lee, Laura Saunders and Amy Hind for cheating at gambling on the 2024 general election date. It gives the sentences, the stakes and potential returns, and attributes the inside information case to the judge and the prosecution. Nothing in it misleads the reader.

What it gets right

  • “have been given suspended sentences after admitting to cheating at gambling on the 2024 general election date”

    Sky News states the outcome plainly. It names the offence the three admitted and the sentence they received, and matches what the BBC and ITV reported the same day.

  • “"The overwhelming inference is that Anthony Lee was receiving inside information as the meeting went on and was acting upon it," the prosecution said.”

    Sky News attributes the most serious part of the case, that Lee acted on information from the Downing Street meeting, to the prosecution rather than stating it in its own voice.

  • “"opened specifically for the purposes of cheating", the judge said”

    Sky News quotes the judge directly and names him as the source of the description of Hind's accounts, so the reader knows whose finding it is.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Sky News

Everything we scored from Sky News