Anadolu Agency (English), on Climate, 27 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Richest 0.1% produce more carbon pollution than : Report

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

A new Oxfam analysis released Tuesday revealed that the world’s richest 0.1%, comprising around 8 million people, produce more carbon pollution than the world’s poorest 3.5 billion people combined. The report found that a person in the richest 0.1% contributed nearly 400 times more to today’s extreme heat waves than someone in the poorest 50% of the global population, while the richest 0.1% collectively produce more than three times as much carbon pollution as the entire population of sub-Saharan Africa.

The report also found that the world’s richest 1% have been responsible for 20% of global warming since 1990, with per capita emissions 100 times higher than those of the poorest half of humanity. It estimated that a single year of emissions from the richest 1% could cause 1.9 million excess heat-related deaths, with 78% of these deaths projected to occur in low- and lower-middle-income countries, which account for just 8% of global emissions.

The report further projected that emissions from the richest 1% would cause nearly $53 trillion in economic damage by 2050. The report also highlighted private aviation as a stark example of carbon inequality, finding that private jets collectively emit more carbon pollution in two seconds than a person in the poorest half of the global population produces in a year. “While the super-rich are responsible for a disproportionate share of carbon pollution, it is ordinary people who bear the brunt of the resulting floods, fires and famine,” the report noted.

The report also warned that climate change could displace up to 1 billion people, around 10% of the global population, by 2050, with most expected to be in the Global South. “The climate crisis is often described as a shared human challenge. It is not. Those who have done the least to cause it are losing their homes, their harvests and, increasingly, their lives. Meanwhile, the super-rich can buy their way out of danger,” said Oxfam International Executive Director Amitabh Behar.

Behar noted that the super-rich also actively profit from the consequences of their pollution. “This is not a tragedy of shared fate; it is a crime of extreme inequality,” Behar added. The report also cautioned that climate disasters are increasingly being used to advance policies that deepen inequality, including privatization, land grabs, deregulation and tax breaks for the super-rich. “The ultra-rich are setting the planet on fire and then charging the rest of us for the extinguishers,” Behar said, adding: “They profit from the pollution.

They profit from the disaster. And they profit again from the clean-up.” Oxfam called on governments attending COP31 to make wealthy polluters pay through higher taxes, significantly increase public climate finance for the Global South and triple adaptation funding by 2035. It also urged governments to reduce inequality through climate-resilient public infrastructure and services, and curb corporate profiteering from climate disasters.

Read the original article on aa.com.tr (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Anadolu reports an Oxfam study on carbon inequality and attributes its figures and claims to Oxfam throughout. The one problem is the headline: it says the richest 0.1% out-pollute the poorest half of humanity, but the body's own figure is the poorest 3.5 billion people, about 44% of a world of roughly 8 billion.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “poorest half of humanity”

    Why this matters
    The headline's words "poorest half of humanity" round the comparison group up to half the world's population.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the richest 0.1% out-pollute the bottom 50% of people on Earth.
    The context
    The body gives the comparison group as the poorest 3.5 billion people. If 8 million people are the richest 0.1%, the world holds about 8 billion, so 3.5 billion is roughly 44%. The Irish Times reports the same study's figure as the poorest 44 per cent, and Common Dreams says nearly half. The gap is modest and the point of the study stands, but the headline states a larger group than the body supports.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “a person in the richest 0.1% contributed nearly 400 times more to today’s extreme heat waves”

    The article ties today's extreme heatwaves directly to emissions. It treats the human cause of hotter extremes as the premise, not a matter for debate.

  • “A new Oxfam analysis released Tuesday revealed”

    The article names the source of every estimate. A reader knows these are Oxfam's figures.

  • “make wealthy polluters pay through higher taxes, significantly increase public climate finance for the Global South and triple adaptation funding by 2035”

    The article states plainly what Oxfam is asking governments at COP31 to do. A reader is not left guessing at the demand behind the report.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Anadolu Agency (English)

  1. 27 OctFrance declares 45 municipalities in Herault region natural disaster areas after floods6.0
  2. 27 OctTurkish communications chief highlights COP31 as opportunity to advance climate diplomacy0.0
  3. 27 OctEU Commission presents climate resilience framework amid rising costs of climate damage0.0
  4. 27 OctGreenhouse gas levels hit record highs in 2025, driving further global warming: WMO0.0
  5. 26 Oct15 young Canadians take federal government to trial over climate policies0.0

Everything we scored from Anadolu Agency (English)