Deutsche Welle (English), on Iran, 6 November 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

Iran war: Gulf tanker attacked, 1 seaferer killed

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

An explosion believed to have been caused by a missile attack on ‌an oil ⁠tanker in the Persian Gulf left one seafarer dead, the vessel's operating company said on Friday. Greek management firm Velos Tankers said the ​Marshall Islands-flagged tanker MT Velos Sapphire ​was sailing towards Bahrain when it ‌was attacked. "The company is ‌greatly saddened to report the ‌death ​of one of its seafarers, who was found fatally injured on board after having initially been ​reported missing in the aftermath of the explosion," the firm said.

The explosion caused a fire to break out in the ship. The crew were able to extinguish the fire without reporting any other injured. Bahrain's Khalifa Bin Salman Port ultimately took in the ship and now a investigation into the incident will be launched to assess the extent of the damage to the vessel's hull. Shipping crews caught in the crossfire of the Hormuz conflict To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Iran using 'everything it can' to stop oil flows

US newspaper The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) cited regional officials, security firms and analysts in a report detailing how Iran is using everything it can to stop the flow of oil leaving the Strait of Hormuz. According to the report, Tehran has launched bomb-laden undersea drones, fired rocket-propelled grenades and deployed crews to attach limpet mines to ships over recent weeks. According to data from the UK Maritime Trade Operations Center (UKMTO), October saw the highest monthly number of attacks in the Strait of Hormuz since the war began, with more than 35 incidents.

At least five vessels have been attacked so far in November, UKMTO added. The increasing attacks coincides with signs of recovery in shipping through Hormuz. US Central Command said last month it had helped Gulf countries export 1.5 billion barrels of oil via Hormuz since the summer. On Thursday, Iranian media reported that five oil tankers and a tugboat caught fire after hitting mines in the Strait of Hormuz. On Friday, Iran's Revolutionary Guards said two more oil tankers were on fire in the strait, state media reported.

Meanwhile, Iranian media said ​on Friday ​that Iranian ​air defenses ‌had destroyed a US ‌MQ-1 drone ‌over Qeshm Island in the Strait ​of Hormuz. The ‌United States did not confirm the incident. It all comes in the wake of the US launching strikes on Qeshm Island on Tuesday, with Iranian state media reporting five explosions in rapid succession. A statement attributed to Iran's Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei warned that the Middle East war would widen if the US resumes its attacks.

Khamenei has rejected the notion that Washington will change course after midterm elections dealt a blow to President Donald Trump . How much oil is getting through the Strait of Hormuz? To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

Read the original article on dw.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Deutsche Welle reports a deadly explosion on the tanker MT Velos Sapphire. Its own lead says only that a missile attack is believed to have caused it, yet DW then calls the incident one of a string of attacks by Iran, with no source naming the attacker. A subheading turns an unconfirmed Iranian media claim about a US drone into DW's own statement that Iran destroyed a missile.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “The incident is the latest in a string of attacks on ships in the Persian Gulf by Iran.”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice DW files this specific attack, "The incident", under attacks "by Iran", naming Iran as the attacker of the Velos Sapphire.
    The impression it gives
    That Iran is established as having fired on the Velos Sapphire and killed the seafarer.
    The context
    The only source DW gives for the attack is the operating company. The company says only that a missile attack is believed to have caused the explosion and names no attacker. Other reporting of a tanker struck in the Gulf that week cites the British military, which also names no attacker. No source in the article says who fired on this ship.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The tanker's operator said an explosion, believed to have been caused by a missile attack, killed one seafarer; no one has said who fired it. The Wall Street Journal has reported that Iran is behind a string of recent attacks on shipping in the Gulf.

  2. Headline goes beyond the article

    Serious

    “Iran destroys missile over Qeshm island”

    Why this matters
    DW's subheading states as its own fact that Iran destroyed a missile. It drops the attribution the body gives and changes the object.
    The impression it gives
    That Iran has been confirmed as shooting down a missile over Qeshm Island.
    The context
    The body attributes the claim to Iranian media and says the object was a US MQ-1 drone, not a missile. DW also reports that the United States did not confirm the incident. The subheading presents an unconfirmed claim as fact and gets the object wrong.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“did not confirm the incident”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Iranian media say air defences shot down US drone over Qeshm Island.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Deutsche Welle (English)

  1. 6 NovFact check: Three viral Iran war posts debunked 0.0
  2. 6 NovHow a lack of reliable information from state media leaves Iranians in the dark about the ongoing US war3.0
  3. 5 NovIran signals satisfaction, skepticism after US midterm vote0.0
  4. 2 NovHow the US midterm elections factor into Donald Trump's plans for the Iran war6.0
  5. 2 NovHow the US midterm elections factor into Donald Trump's plans for the Iran war6.0

Everything we scored from Deutsche Welle (English)