Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on West Bank, 23 October 2026

8.8out of 10Serious

Netanyahu announces new IDF strategy in Hebron,

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.8 findings

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced Friday afternoon, during a visit to the scene of the terrorist attack near Hebron, that the IDF will adopt a new operational strategy in the neighborhood from which the terrorists emerged. The plan includes , conducting house-to-house searches, locating weapons and . Netanyahu said the strategy would apply the military model used in refugee camps in Judea and Samaria and could later be expanded to additional cities.

“We are going to implement the successful and aggressive model we used in the refugee camps, which are essentially terrorist strongholds," Netanyahu said. “That is exactly what we will do here, in a neighborhood in Hebron from which the terrorists emerged. We will evacuate the residents, go from house to house, remove the weapons there, and address and demolish all terrorist infrastructure." The Prime Minister also announced additional measures in the Hebron area.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article gives the removal of Hebron residents only in Netanyahu's and Katz's words. It leaves out that soldiers were filmed ordering Palestinians in Farsh al-Hawa out of their homes ahead of demolition, that the Palestinian Authority called this collective punishment, and that B'Tselem warned of forcible displacement and possible war crimes. Without this, a reader believes the measure is an uncontested security step.

How we know

“At the same time, we are imposing a siege on the cities of Hebron and Halhul. We will consider expanding this model to other cities as well," he said. Netanyahu said Israel would also , which he claimed pose a threat to security forces. “We will clear out the illegal structures along the roads at an accelerated pace. They pose a threat to our forces," he said. Netanyahu addressed the incident in which IDF soldiers were wounded while stopping the terrorists, linking it to warnings issued in recent weeks about attempts to attack Israel ahead of the upcoming elections.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article gives the demolitions of structures only Netanyahu's security reason. It leaves out that Smotrich said at the same site that he had ordered demolitions to exact a price for the attack. Without this, a reader believes the demolitions are only about protecting soldiers.

How we know

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article says only that soldiers were wounded. It never says that two soldiers were killed at the checkpoint, or that both attackers were killed. Without this, a reader does not know what the attack involved.

How we know

“We warned several weeks ago about attempts by our enemies to harm us, our civilians and our soldiers ahead of the elections. That is what they tried to do here," he said. “IDF soldiers stopped them with their own bodies and were also wounded. The soldiers not only stopped the terrorists, but also charged forward courageously and eliminated them." Netanyahu subsequently revealed that the IDF was preparing for the possibility of , although no date had yet been set.

“The Defense Minister and I have seen an IDF operation in Judea and Samaria on a very broad scale, unlike anything carried out since the Six-Day War," he said. “The IDF is ready to carry it out, and we will determine the timing, but it is coming." Netanyahu did not detail the number of forces expected to participate, the areas in which the operation might take place or its possible timetable. He stressed that a decision on when to launch it would be made at a later stage.

Alongside his announcements on security measures, the Prime Minister also addressed continued construction and development in . “We are going to destroy terrorist infrastructure and build the infrastructure for Jewish communities," he said. According to Netanyahu, . Addressing residents of the region, Netanyahu said: “You are standing firm on the front lines.

You are an example to the people of Israel and to the State of Israel." He concluded by pledging to continue both efforts simultaneously: “We will destroy terrorist infrastructure and establish more and more communities." Defense Minister Israel Katz issued a separate statement confirming that the neighborhood in Hebron from which the terrorists emerged would be evacuated and all terrorist infrastructure there destroyed, following the operational model used in the Jenin refugee camp.

Katz warned that “the terrorists, their handlers, and those who provide them with protection and assistance will pay a very heavy price." He also claimed that Iran and its proxies, together with the Muslim Brotherhood axis, were planning terrorist attacks aimed at influencing Israel's upcoming elections.

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (8)

Arutz Sheva reports Netanyahu's Hebron announcements in the occupation's own vocabulary: in its own voice it writes "Judea and Samaria" for the occupied West Bank, "evacuating residents" for ordering Palestinians out of their homes, and "terrorist infrastructure" for what is to be demolished. It reports a plan for more than 100 new settlements and 100 farms without saying that the settlements are illegal. It gives no Palestinian voice, and it leaves out the charges of collective punishment and forcible displacement that other outlets reported about the same orders.

  1. Uses the occupation's words

    Serious

    “signals major Judea and Samaria operation”

    Why this matters
    The headline uses "Judea and Samaria", the Israeli government's name for the territory, in the outlet's own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the planned offensive as an operation inside Israel's own territory, under its biblical name.
    The context
    The territory is the occupied West Bank, and the ICJ has found the occupation unlawful. The article never uses the words occupied or West Bank, while other coverage of the same event says "the West Bank city".

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “an especially large-scale military operation in Judea and Samaria”

    Why this matters
    In the outlet's narration, outside any quotation, the reporter repeats "Judea and Samaria" for the place where the offensive is planned.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it that the largest operation since 1967 is planned for a territory whose status is not in question.
    The context
    The operation is planned for occupied Palestinian territory, where the ICJ has found Israel's presence unlawful. Netanyahu's own words in S19 use the same term, so the outlet adopts it as its own.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    “Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls settlements "Jewish communities" and places them in "Judea and Samaria", in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes these as ordinary towns in Israeli land.
    The context
    They are settlements in the occupied West Bank, which the ICJ has found illegal under international law.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Netanyahu said Israeli occupation forces were preparing a large offensive in the occupied West Bank, and spoke of building more settlements there.

  2. Uses the occupation's words

    Serious

    “evacuating residents”

    Why this matters
    In the outlet's own voice, "evacuating residents" describes Palestinians being ordered out of their homes so that the neighbourhood can be searched and demolished.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes residents are being moved for their own safety.
    The context
    Soldiers ordered Palestinians in Farsh al-Hawa out of their homes ahead of demolition. The Palestinian Authority called this collective punishment, and B'Tselem warned of forcible displacement.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The plan includes ordering Palestinian residents out of a Hebron neighbourhood, searching homes and demolishing buildings, which B'Tselem warned amounts to forcible displacement and collective punishment.

  3. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “demolishing terrorist infrastructure”

    Why this matters
    The outlet adopts the army's label "terrorist infrastructure" in its own voice for what will be demolished.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes only militant facilities will be destroyed.
    The context
    Other coverage shows homes are being measured and residents ordered out ahead of demolition. Whether these buildings are "terrorist infrastructure" is the government's claim, not an established fact.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The plan includes demolishing buildings, including homes, that the government calls terrorist infrastructure.

  4. Hedges the documented record

    Serious

    “the government is advancing plans for the construction and legalization of more than 100 new communities and more than 100 farms”

    Why this matters
    The outlet reports a plan for more than 100 new settlements and farms, and calls it "legalization", without ever saying that settlements are illegal under international law.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes these settlements become lawful once the Israeli government approves them.
    The context
    The ICJ's July 2024 advisory opinion found the settlements illegal and the occupation unlawful. Israeli approval does not change that status, and the article does not state it.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Netanyahu said the government is advancing plans for more than 100 new settlements and more than 100 farms in the occupied West Bank, which the International Court of Justice has found illegal under international law.

  5. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    The article gives the removal of Hebron residents only in Netanyahu's and Katz's words. It leaves out that soldiers were filmed ordering Palestinians in Farsh al-Hawa out of their homes ahead of demolition, that the Palestinian Authority called this collective punishment, and that B'Tselem warned of forcible displacement and possible war crimes. Without this, a reader believes the measure is an uncontested security step.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  6. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “accelerate the removal of illegal structures along roads”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls the demolition of Palestinian buildings "removal" and calls the buildings "illegal structures" in its own voice. Only the threat claim is attributed.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as tidying up unlawful buildings for safety.
    The context
    These are demolitions of Palestinian buildings. Smotrich said such demolitions were meant to punish people for the attack.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  7. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article gives the demolitions of structures only Netanyahu's security reason. It leaves out that Smotrich said at the same site that he had ordered demolitions to exact a price for the attack. Without this, a reader believes the demolitions are only about protecting soldiers.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  8. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article says only that soldiers were wounded. It never says that two soldiers were killed at the checkpoint, or that both attackers were killed. Without this, a reader does not know what the attack involved.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 23 OctHikers attacked in Samaria: 'They beat us with clubs and filmed us'6.0
  2. 23 OctCleared for publication: Ron and Yuval fell in shooting attack near Hebron8.0
  3. 23 OctHelmet camera captures dramatic gunfight with Hebron terrorists8.0
  4. 23 OctSecurity coordinator charged after Arab seriously injured in shooting, claims self-defense7.3
  5. 23 OctTerrorists eliminated | Two critically injured in shooting attack near Judea Junction7.3

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News