The Jerusalem Post, on West Bank, 25 October 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

Hospital delays, curfews as Israeli peace groups condemn displacements of Palestinians in Hebron

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

The health and wellbeing of around 1200 is being put at risk by the forced displacement being carried out in response to , multiple Israeli human rights organizations told The Jerusalem Post on Sunday.The IDF announced that its operation in the Al-Jaladah and Ein Deir Baha neighborhoods near the military checkpoint at the entrance to Hebron was aimed at locating terrorists and weapons and would include demolitions.

The Palestinian Authority condemned the operation as “collective punishment,” while Palestinian officials warned that it would have a significant impact on civilian life. Yousef Zouhair Al-Jabari, head of Hebron's municipality, told Reuters that around 1,300 additional people faced losing their homes, on top of the 1,200 already displaced..Milena Ansari, director of Physicians for Human Rights Israel's Palestinian Territory Department, told the Post that the effects of the latest operation were already being felt by sick and vulnerable residents.Palestinians fear displacement could be more long-termCiting the testimony of Osama Abu Sbeih, a Palestinian ambulance driver with the private Al-Salam Ambulance service in Hebron, PHRI reported multiple incidents in which patients were unable to reach critical medical care promptly, including a six-month-old baby suffering from a lung infection who had to wait two days to be transferred from a hospital in Ramallah to Hebron.“Crews are relying on passing patients from one ambulance to another at checkpoints.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article gives the army's stated aim of locating weapons and attackers. It leaves out that Defence Minister Israel Katz acknowledged the forced displacement of around 2,000 people and said they would not return until what he called Hamas infrastructure was dismantled. It also leaves out that Netanyahu announced an offensive involving the displacement of Palestinians. Without these, a reader may take the displacement as a side effect of a search rather than stated policy.

How we know

Even our mobile clinic that usually goes across the West Bank to provide medical treatment couldn't reach Msafaryatta for a scheduled medical day,” Ansari said. “But it's the long-term damage, which is a bit less visible but is as serious as what we're seeing right now on the ground.”Ansari shared her fears that the temporary displacement would become more long-term, and warned that the Palestinians housed in temporary shelters or in the crowded homes of relatives would be at risk.

Noting that many of the shelters lack proper heating, entering the winter months without proper housing could drive respiratory infections.For those with chronic conditions, she continued, the disruption to routine can create emergency situations. Patients with hypertension, diabetes and on dialysis might particularly struggle should these disruptions become long-term, she warned.“The psychological toll of being forced out of your home in the middle of the night, especially for the children…These psychological hardships last longer even after an operation ends,” Ansari shared.Israeli rights group tells IDF there's no link between demolitions and terror attackThe Association for Civil Rights in Israel, in a letter addressed to senior officials in the IDF, including IDF Central Command chief Maj.

Gen. Avi Bluth, seen by the Post, complained that there was no evidence of links between the houses being destroyed and the terrorists who carried out last week's attacks.ACRI also shared concern in response to and left without shelter, that worshippers had been cut off from accessing the Ibrahimi mosque and that thousands were cut off from reaching work and school."No attack, however grave, gives the military license to punish an entire city.

Families who had nothing to do with the attack are being driven out and their homes demolished, while ministers present this to voters, a few days before the election, as the price Palestinians must pay. That is collective punishment. The military must stop it and let these families return home now, and ACRI will use every legal means available to make sure it does," said Noa Sattath, Executive Director of ACRI.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

The Jerusalem Post gives real space to Israeli rights groups and Palestinian medical testimony about the forced displacement in Hebron. In its own voice it calls the attackers "terrorists" without saying who they attacked or that IOF killed them, and it never says the West Bank is occupied. It also casts Palestinian accounts of demolitions as allegation, even though the army itself announced demolitions.

  1. Labels people on one side's word

    Serious

    “a terror attack carried out by two terrorists last week”

    Why this matters
    The Post calls the attack "a terror attack" and the two attackers "terrorists" in its own voice. It never says who or what was attacked, or what happened to the attackers.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the terrorist label as established fact, and may assume civilians were the target.
    The context
    Other coverage reports that the two Palestinians attacked an Israeli military checkpoint, that two soldiers were killed, and that Israeli forces killed both attackers, all according to Israeli figures. An earlier army account said they fired at settlers. The label rests on the Israeli military's account alone, and the article never mentions soldiers or that anyone was killed.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The displacement followed an attack last week in which, according to Israeli figures, two Palestinians attacked an Israeli military checkpoint, killing two soldiers, before Israeli forces killed both attackers.

  2. Hedges the documented record

    Serious

    “Palestinian civilians in the West Bank”

    Why this matters
    The Post reports an army operation that displaces about 1,200 Palestinian civilians and demolishes their homes, and it calls the place only "the West Bank". The words occupied and occupation appear nowhere in the article.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is never told that IOF are carrying out these displacements and demolitions as an occupying power in territory whose occupation has been ruled unlawful.
    The context
    The ICJ found Israel's occupation of the West Bank unlawful in July 2024. The legal status of the territory goes to the heart of a story about an occupying army forcing civilians from their homes.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The health of around 1,200 Palestinian civilians in Hebron, in the occupied West Bank, is at risk from the forced displacement carried out by Israeli occupation forces.

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Al-Jabari alleged that the military had demolished shops, factories, homes, and roads in Hebron”

    Why this matters
    The word "alleged" casts the Hebron mayor's account of demolitions as an unproven claim.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is left unsure whether the demolitions happened at all.
    The context
    The article itself reports that the army announced its operation would include demolitions, so the Palestinian account is the one given the doubt, not the army's.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“would include demolitions”

    Show it in the article

    “the Palestinian claim that some of the displaced were removed from their home at night”

    Why this matters
    The Post calls the account of night-time removals "the Palestinian claim".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the removals as a disputed Palestinian version of events.
    The context
    Other coverage reports that Israeli forces marked homes and handed out notices ordering families to leave. Israel's defence minister acknowledged that around 2,000 Palestinians had been forcibly displaced.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  4. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article gives the army's stated aim of locating weapons and attackers. It leaves out that Defence Minister Israel Katz acknowledged the forced displacement of around 2,000 people and said they would not return until what he called Hamas infrastructure was dismantled. It also leaves out that Netanyahu announced an offensive involving the displacement of Palestinians. Without these, a reader may take the displacement as a side effect of a search rather than stated policy.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 25 OctIDF seriously injures, fails to detain Palestinian accused of attempted ramming attack - report3.0
  2. 25 OctIDF seals off homes of terrorists who committed fatal Hebron attack ahead of intended demolition7.3
  3. 25 OctIDF pushing for Hebron attack to be classified as clash between soldiers, terrorists, not terror6.0
  4. 25 OctThree Hebron residents arrested for online incitement to terrorism, support for Hamas6.0
  5. 25 OctIDF evacuates Israeli rioters after fire breaks out near Palestinian West Bank town6.0

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post