Tehran Times, on Iran, 10 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Rezaei: US must accept Iran’s seven conditions before any negotiations

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findingsSee them marked on tehrantimes.com

TEHRAN – Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Mohsen Rezaei has ruled out negotiations with the United States unless Washington takes concrete steps to meet Tehran’s seven conditions, while dismissing and a possible meeting with US Vice President JD Vance in Doha. In a post on his X account on Tuesday, Rezaei called on Washington to stop circulating 'fabricated reports' about negotiations with Tehran and acknowledge the emergence of a new order in West Asia.

“The war on Iran has already wrecked the US government. But Washington flails like a desperate gambler. FOLD YOUR HAND. STOP manufacturing FAKE NEWS about imaginary talks,” he wrote. “Stop denying the West Asian NEW ORDER. Time to SURRENDER to the seven conditions Iran has repeatedly set out,” Rezaei added, addressing US officials. His remarks followed a statement by a senior Iranian security official in Tehran on Monday .

The official stressed that Iran’s policy and plans regarding negotiations with Washington remained unchanged and that no talks were envisaged unless the United States took practical action within the framework of Iran’s seven conditions. The position is consistent with Tehran’s latest diplomatic proposal, which Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei has described as the most logical roadmap for restoring security in the Strait of Hormuz.

Under the proposal, commercial shipping would resume passage through the strategic waterway within 48 hours after the United States lifts its naval blockade of Iranian ports, ends the war on all fronts, and unfreezes Iranian assets held abroad. Baqaei said the proposal was based on understandings previously reached under the Islamabad memorandum and remained on the table as a demonstration of Iran’s goodwill. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has also said Washington must choose between accepting Iran’s conditions and continuing the war, emphasizing that the country’s Armed Forces are prepared for either eventuality.

Read the original article on tehrantimes.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Tehran Times reports Mohsen Rezaei's refusal to negotiate with the United States unless it meets Iran's seven conditions, and quotes his X post at length with clear attribution. In its own voice the outlet calls the reported talks "imaginary", adopting Rezaei's position as fact. It never says who reported the talks and gives no US response.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “reports of imaginary talks”

    Why this matters
    The outlet's own word "imaginary" describes the reported talks, before any quotation begins.
    The impression it gives
    That it is established that no talks or planned meeting exist, rather than that Iranian officials deny them.
    The context
    That the talks are fabricated is Rezaei's claim and that of an unnamed Iranian official. The article quotes him saying "STOP manufacturing FAKE NEWS about imaginary talks" and reports the official "rejecting media reports". The outlet gives no independent basis of its own.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“STOP manufacturing FAKE NEWS about imaginary talks”
    • Elsewhere in the article“rejecting media reports that Rezaei was scheduled to meet Vance”

    Show it in the article

  2. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “rejecting media reports that Rezaei was scheduled to meet Vance in Doha, Qatar”

    Why this matters
    The outlet reports only the Iranian denial of the "media reports". It never says which outlets carried them or what they said.
    The impression it gives
    That the reports had no source worth naming, and that the only account of the possible talks is Iran's.
    The context
    Every voice in the article is an Iranian official: Rezaei, an unnamed security official, Baqaei and Araghchi. The reports themselves and any US account appear nowhere. The article contains no word from the White House.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “White House”.

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “Rezaei added, addressing US officials”

    The outlet keeps Rezaei's demands and his capitalised rhetoric inside quotation marks and attributes them to him.

  • “commercial shipping would resume passage through the strategic waterway within 48 hours after the United States lifts its naval blockade of Iranian ports, ends the war on all fronts, and unfreezes Iranian assets held abroad”

    The outlet sets out the concrete terms of the proposal, so readers can see what Iran is actually asking for.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Tehran Times

  1. 10 NovIRGC Unveils New Underground Missile City in Show of Power 0.0
  2. 10 NovAraghchi: No plans for meeting between Vance and Iran’s security chief3.0
  3. 10 NovIran criticizes Grossi’s double standard over condemnation of attacks on nuclear facilities3.0
  4. 10 NovTwo oil tankers catch fire after explosions in Strait of Hormuz3.0
  5. 10 NovThree-Month training program for “Jan-Fada-ye Iran” battalions begins at Javad Al-Aemmeh army base0.0

Everything we scored from Tehran Times

See how 30 outlets covered this story