The Jewish Chronicle, on UK Politics, 1 November 2026

8.0out of 10Severe

Green mayor quits party over ‘Zionism is racism’ motion: ‘It crossed a line’

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

A Green mayor has quit the party citing its “Zionism is racism” policy, which, he says “crossed a line”. Drew Creek, the Mayor of Newquay and leader of the Cornwall Greens has joined the Labour and Co-operative Party following last month’s annual Green Party autumn conference, where the controversial motion was passed. Announcing his decision online Creek said: “I can't stand behind that, and I won't pretend otherwise.” Addressing residents in the post on Facebook, he said: “I want you to hear this from me directly.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says what the motion states or how it defines Zionism, nor that members passed it by 1,022 votes to 813. Without this a reader knows the motion only as "inflammatory" and "controversial" and cannot judge what the mayor objected to.

How we know

I have decided to leave the Green Party and join the Labour group on Cornwall Council. It wasn’t a decision I made lightly. I have spent several weeks thinking it through.” The mayor continued: “The motion passed at the Green Party’s national conference this month, and the direction the party has taken since, is something I cannot support or stand behind. I have kept trying to make my peace with it, and I can’t. I would rather be honest with you about that than carry on representing a party whose position I don’t share.”

Creek stressed that he still had “great respect” for his former Green Party colleagues across Cornwall and would “keep working alongside them wherever we agree”. He added that his commitment to the area, and local issues including fighting for investment and access to housing and improvements to infrastructure was “exactly the same as it was the day you elected me”. Signing off, Creek promised that as mayor he would continue to serve Newquay “without party politics” .

Kate Ewert, Labour and Co-operative group leader on Cornwall Council, said Creek's decision to defect “highlights the serious questions about [Green leader] Zack Polanski's leadership”. Polanski did not attend or vote when his party passed the motion on October 4. Noah Law, the Labour MP for St Austell and Newquay, praised Creek, saying: “In this period of polarised politics, it takes great courage to stand up for what you believe in.”

He added: “Having worked with Drew since my election, I have always found him to be steadfast in his beliefs, easy to work with, and a good advocate for Newquay.” Cornwall Green Party said in a statement it was “deeply saddened by Cllr Drew Creek’s decision to join the Labour Party” and praised the “excellent work” Creek had done as a Green councillor. The statement said: “We understand that there are different views within the Green Party on the ‘Zionism is racism’ motion.

As a party, we have always accommodated a range of differing views, and we do not try to impose uniformity of belief among our members or our elected representatives.” It added that “disagreements over the wording of this one motion” should not distract from the Green Party’s “condemnation” of . Israel has repeatedly rejected accusations of genocide, stating its military operations in Gaza are a legitimate exercise of self-defence against Hamas.

Cornwall Green Party continued in its statement: “It’s hard to see how anyone who is serious about action on climate, action to end extreme inequality, and action to prevent an ongoing genocide could switch their support to a party that is not serious about any of these. “Everyone who shares our vision of creating fairer, greener communities is welcome in the Green Party. We are saddened that Drew has decided to throw in his lot with a party that does not share that vision."

Read the original article on thejc.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Jewish Chronicle reports the Newquay mayor's defection from the Greens fairly through his own words and the Cornwall Green Party's reply. It then adds, in its own voice, Israel's denial of genocide and its self-defence case, and never mentions that a UN Commission of Inquiry has found Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. It also calls the motion "inflammatory" in its own voice without telling readers what the motion says.

  1. Hedges the documented genocide finding

    Severe

    “what it characterised as the “racist genocide and ethnic cleansing” it claimed that Israel was perpetrating”

    Why this matters
    The JC wraps the genocide in three layers of distance: quotation marks, "characterised as" and "it claimed".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes genocide in Gaza to be only the Green Party's description, a partisan view rather than a documented finding.
    The context
    The genocide is a documented finding of a UN Commission of Inquiry, not a party's characterisation. The article follows this sentence with Israel's denial and nothing else.

    How we know

    • On the recordA UN Commission of Inquiry has found that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.ohchr.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Elsewhere in the article“repeatedly rejected accusations of genocide”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The Cornwall Green Party condemned what it called Israel's "racist genocide and ethnic cleansing". A UN Commission of Inquiry has found that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza; Israel rejects the finding.

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “inflammatory”

    Why this matters
    The JC calls the motion "inflammatory" in its own voice, in the first sentence, before any speaker is quoted.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as settled that the motion is incendiary, without learning anything about what it says.
    The context
    The article never says what the motion states. The BBC reported its definition of Zionism as an ideology supporting a Jewish state in historic Palestine to the exclusion or domination of the non-Jewish population. The verdict belongs to the motion's opponents, not to the outlet.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says what the motion states or how it defines Zionism, nor that members passed it by 1,022 votes to 813. Without this a reader knows the motion only as "inflammatory" and "controversial" and cannot judge what the mayor objected to.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jewish Chronicle

  1. 31 OctA Jewish community must have room for those without children0.0
  2. 30 OctThe Bell review’s quiet nod to the role of Islamism in school antisemitism8.0
  3. 29 OctExclusive: Sir David Bell defends report on antisemitism in education after Owen Jones claimed it was ‘riddled with errors’7.3
  4. 29 OctMy report on antisemitism in education is based on hard evidence – now let’s implement its findings0.0
  5. 29 Oct‘Another missed opportunity’: Jewish charities give their verdict on the Budget0.0

Everything we scored from The Jewish Chronicle