The Irish Times, on UK Politics, 8 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

The UK , it has been revealed. The overall cost of Brexit was put at an estimated £4.7 billion (€5.6 billion) by Britain’s National Audit Office last year, but this included years-long transformation of the software used for customs declarations and other systems built to cope with the UK leaving the single market. Fresh information from the UK tax office on the exact spend on the seven “inland border facilities” has come to light.

The sites were built but quickly decommissioned as the Conservative government at the time vacillated over plans to check goods coming in from the Continent. The EU launched all the checks in Calais, Dublin and other European ports from day one as the UK was treated as a “third country” overnight. A site that remains operational is Holyhead, a small site close to the main road to the port which receives goods from Ireland. According to a freedom of information (FOI) request, the site cost £14 million to acquire and another £23 million to build.

But five of the seven “inland border facilities” in England and Wales never got to operational stage because the Tories decided not to implement all the border checks after concluding food coming from the EU would be of the same high standard as it was before Brexit. Portsmouth port, which is owned by the city council, spent £23 million on building its border control post, which has never been used at full capacity because of the decision to scale back the checks.

The port received £17.1 million in government funding for the project, leaving the council to make up the £6 million shortfall, which could otherwise have been spent on essential services. The most controversial British zombie facility was known as “Dover white cliffs”. Furious residents at the village of Guston were told of the plans for the inland border facility on December 31st, 2020, just hours before a “transition year” ended and Brexit was due to be implemented with supposed checks on all lorries coming across the Channel. [ British Ambassador to Ireland Kara Owen on current Anglo-Irish relations, trade opportunities, and the possibility of a Brexit reversal Opens in new window ] Information from tax authorities, released under an FOI request, shows the facility has so far cost the taxpayer £28 million, even though it remains a field.

The Department for Transport paid £21 million to procure the site and spent a further £7 million on initial ground works, including an archaeological survey for any Roman remains. Other unused sites were at Birmingham, in the airport car park; in Warrington, serving lorries coming from Ireland to Liverpool, Holyhead and Heysham; at Ebbsfleet, on the Thames estuary; and at North Weald, near Stansted airport. Authorities said Birmingham, Ebbsfleet and North Weald “did not require the acquisition of land”.

The decision to build Brexit lorry parks so far from Dover underlined the lack of preparation for the UK’s departure from the EU. Most of the UK’s lorry traffic is concentrated in Dover, but as a designated area of outstanding beauty it was impossible to conduct the post-Brexit customs and standard checks near the port. The UK finally opted for a site 20 miles inland at Sevington in Kent, but even that was last minute. The government previously revealed in a parliamentary question that total capital costs ran to £154 million.

This included £30 million on the acquisition of farmland between Sevington and Mersham for Britain’s principal Brexit border facility and another £70 million to build it. HMRC has revealed through FOI that the operational costs have run to £179 million, money that would not have been spent had Brexit not happened. – Guardian

Read the original article on irishtimes.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Irish Times reports the cost of seven inland Brexit border sites, mostly from freedom of information releases, and attributes its figures to HMRC, the Department for Transport and a parliamentary answer. Its headline and opening line put more than €100m on posts "never used", but the only itemised costs in the body that reach that sum include Holyhead, which the article says remains operational, and Portsmouth, which has been used below full capacity. Of the sites that were never used, the body costs only one, at £28 million.

  1. Uses figures that mislead

    Serious

    “wasted more than €100m in taxpayers’ money to set up zombie Brexit border inspection posts that were never used”

    Why this matters
    The words "more than €100m" are tied directly to posts "that were never used", so the figure reads as money spent on sites that sat idle.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the article has shown more than €100m was spent on border posts that never operated.
    The context
    The body costs three sites. Holyhead cost £14 million plus £23 million but "remains operational". Portsmouth spent £23 million on a post used, though not at full capacity. The only never-used site with a cost is the Dover white cliffs field at £28 million. Together the three come to about £88 million, roughly the €100m in the headline. The article does not show over €100m spent on sites that were never used. It does not cost Birmingham, Warrington, Ebbsfleet or North Weald.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“A site that remains operational is Holyhead”
    • Elsewhere in the article“the site cost £14 million to acquire and another £23 million to build”
    • Elsewhere in the article“which has never been used at full capacity”
    • Elsewhere in the article“the facility has so far cost the taxpayer £28 million”

    Show it in the article

    “UK wasted more than €100m on zombie Brexit border inspection posts”

    Why this matters
    The headline attaches the whole €100m figure to "zombie" posts, a word the article uses for sites that were never used.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the headline to mean every euro of the €100m went on posts that never ran.
    The context
    The body's costed sites include Holyhead, which it calls operational, and Portsmouth, which has been used at reduced capacity. Only £28 million is costed for a site that remains unused.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“A site that remains operational is Holyhead”
    • Elsewhere in the article“The most controversial British zombie facility”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The UK spent about £88 million on three Brexit border sites, including £28 million on a Dover facility that is still a field, while Holyhead remains in use and Portsmouth's post runs below capacity.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Irish Times

  1. 8 NovMicheál Martin lays wreath at Enniskillen commemoration 40 years after IRA bombing0.0
  2. 7 NovDeath announced of John Kelly, tireless campaigner for Bloody Sunday victims0.0
  3. 6 NovSinn Féin could do more to support Catholic recruitment in PSNI, Taoiseach says3.0
  4. 6 NovCan Brexit save Nigel Farage again?3.0
  5. 6 NovMicheál Martin to be first taoiseach to attend PSNI graduation today0.0

Everything we scored from The Irish Times