City AM, on UK Politics, 30 October 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

Burnham’s former economic adviser gives Budget a four out of 10

No framing issues found.

One of Andy Burnham’s former economic advisers has given John Healey’s Budget a four out of 10, warning there remained a 50 per cent chance the UK economy will be in worse shape next year than it is now. Andy Haldane, who for years served as chief economist at the Bank of England, told the BBC there was nothing in the Chancellor’s maiden fiscal event to reduce the “credibility gap this government faces” with the bond market and its concerns over Britain’s fiscal path.

“It was a Budget with a tincey bit more spending, a tincey bit more tax and nothing really that would give us any greater confidence that those debts and deficit could be brought down – if anything those deficits and debts were revised upwards” he said, adding: “We remain in a position of quite acute fiscal precarity.” Haldane was held up by some in Andy Burnham’s camp as one of three economic heavyweights helping shape the Prime Minister’s plans for government, though his involvement never evolved into a formal role.

Now, the president of the British Chambers of Commerce, he has since issued a string of rebukes over what he sees as the government’s unwillingness to tackle Britain’s perilous fiscal situation or unleash the private sector in its pursuit for growth. Speaking to the Political Thinking podcast, Haldane said the UK had been given a temporary reprieve by the fact the “markets’ spotlight is not on us”. “It’s focused across the Channel,” he added.

“France is ablaze when it comes to concerns about their debt and deficits […] Nonetheless it wouldn’t take much for that for that searchlight to cross the Channel onto our shores, and that’s why I wanted the Chancellor to put more insurance in place – to guard against that fire spreading across the Channel. The former Bank of England official gave Healey’s maiden fiscal event a four out of 10, on the grounds it failed to make sufficient inroads into protecting the public finances.

“I think this is around a four,” he said, adding: “John Healey plainly [on Wednesday] had sworn the Hippocratic oath before he gave his speech. It was a do-no-harm Budget and as best we could tell, people shrugged: businesses, consumers, financial markets. And given its predecessors, maybe we should thank heavens for those small mercies.” Healey avoids bond market backlash in Budget The Chancellor managed to avoid any immediate political or market fallout from his first Budget on Wednesday, which included the largest number of individual announcements in history but the smallest overall change to the overall fiscal picture in several years.

Headline measures included a £2.4bn energy support package restricted to households in council tax bands A to D and a temporary windfall tax on the UK’s banks. Government bond yields fell during Wednesday’s trading, in a sign of investor relief at the package. In the aftermath of the announcement, fixed income traders cheered Healey’s commitment to his predecessor’s fiscal rules and an absence of any inflationary or unfunded spending measures.

But gilt yields remain the highest of any G7 economy, amid concerns over the UK economy’s slow growth, high debt and vulnerability to inflation. Haldane said the government would have enjoyed a sharper and more sustained drop in its borrowing costs, if Healey oversaw a concerted effort to bear down on public spending. He told the BBC: “Had the Chancellor… stood up and surprised the markets – and probably me as well – and done a first instalment to get pulic spending under control, I think he would have been rewarded handsomely by the market in lower borrowing costs; not just governments, by the way, but also for mortgages and indeed for businesses.”

The Treasury was approached for comment.

Read the original article on cityam.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

City AM reports Andy Haldane's four out of 10 verdict on John Healey's first Budget, quoting him at length and attributing his views to him. It sets his criticism against the market reaction on the day, including falling bond yields. Nothing in it misleads the reader.

What it gets right

  • “over what he sees as the government’s unwillingness to tackle Britain’s perilous fiscal situation”

    City AM keeps Haldane's judgement of the government as his own view with "what he sees as" rather than adopting it in its own voice.

  • “though his involvement never evolved into a formal role”

    The article does not overstate the "former adviser" tie in its headline. It tells the reader plainly that Haldane never held a formal role.

  • “Government bond yields fell during Wednesday’s trading, in a sign of investor relief at the package.”

    The article sets the market's actual reaction against Haldane's criticism, so the reader does not take one economist's score as the whole verdict on the Budget.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from City AM

  1. 30 OctThe OBR is clear: Not a single measure from this Budget will raise growth3.0
  2. 30 OctDrax CEO: Britain needs reliable energy whatever the weather0.0
  3. 29 OctHealey under fire on spending plans as UK faces ‘worst decade for living standards on record’3.0
  4. 29 OctHealey promises ‘reduction’ in welfare spending before election0.0
  5. 29 OctBudget 2026: Four OBR forecasts lay bare Britain’s fiscal vulnerability0.0

Everything we scored from City AM