New York Post, on Climate, 28 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

LA pushes oil drilling shutdown despite industry warnings of lawsuits, gas price hikes

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Los Angeles is pushing ahead with a sweeping 20-year shutdown of oil drilling across the city after the Council voted 13-0 Wednesday, despite warnings from oil companies of costly lawsuits, property rights violations and increased dependence on foreign oil. The vote marks another chapter in a nearly decade-long battle over drilling in Los Angeles, where more than 5,200 oil and gas wells, including active, idle and abandoned sites, have fueled concerns about pollution near homes and schools. 5 Los Angeles is moving ahead with a sweeping 20-year phaseout of oil drilling after the City Council voted 13-0 Wednesday.

Los Angeles Times via Getty Images E&B Natural Resources Management Corporation and three affiliated companies filed objections saying that the restrictions could force wells to close before the 20-year deadline by limiting maintenance and other operations. In a June 8 letter , attorneys representing the companies warned that the proposal could violate constitutional property protections and expose taxpayers to expensive litigation. 5 More than 5,200 oil and gas wells dot Los Angeles, including active, idle and abandoned sites, fueling concerns about pollution near homes and schools.

Getty Images Explore More Tinder date rape victim drags attacker to court after ‘slap in the face’ sentence Terrifying moment thug attempts to kidnap screaming woman at popular resort: ‘He looked like a monster’ Dozens of House Dems ditch Ilhan Omar as party rallies to block Trump immigration probe The California Independent Petroleum Association also blasted the measure, warning that shutting down local production would increase dependence on imported oil and threaten investments made under existing permits.

“Why the LA City Council would want Angelenos to be more dependent on foreign oil tankers is nuts. Having to pay $1.72 more than any other state is not high enough? Imports are completely exempt from California’s environmental, labor, and human rights laws, California Independent Petroleum Association CEO Rock Zierman told the California Post. “This will lead to higher greenhouse gas emissions, higher gas prices, fewer jobs, and fewer taxes for vital services … We will fight this illegal action in court again, Zierman added.

“Studies have shown there are much higher emissions from city run landfills and water treatment facilities than oil and gas operations.” 5 Los Angeles oil producers are fighting back against , warning that new restrictions could force wells to close years before the 20-year deadline. David Buchan for Ca Post Los Angeles approved its original drilling ban in December 2022, only to face lawsuits from oil companies.

A judge struck down the ordinance in September 2024, forcing the city to repeal it in 2025. But state lawmakers handed Los Angeles another opening, passing a law that strengthened local governments’ authority to regulate oil drilling. Now city leaders are bracing for another courtroom showdown. “We know we’re going to get sued,” Councilwoman Katy Yaroslavsky warned Wednesday, stressing that the city had spent substantial resources building a stronger environmental and legal case. 5 A drone’s eye view shows oil rigs in Windsor Hills in Los Angeles.

Los Angeles Times via Getty Images , arguing that zoning laws should protect residents from harmful industrial operations. Councilwoman Traci Park also backed the restrictions, saying oil wells don’t belong in residential neighborhoods. “They’re bad for the environment, and they make people sick,” Park told colleagues. 5 The unanimous vote included an order to move the measure forward immediately David Buchan for Ca Post Los Angeles produced approximately 1.6 million barrels of crude oil in 2024, accounting for just 1.4% of California’s total production, according to city planning documents.

Wednesday’s council agenda also included a federal lawsuit filed by Nasco Petroleum challenging the city’s earlier oil drilling ordinance. The unanimous vote included an order to move the measure forward immediately.

Read the original article on nypost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The New York Post reports the Los Angeles council's 13-0 vote for a 20-year phaseout of oil drilling, quoting both the oil industry and council members. It twice calls the measure a "crackdown" in its own voice, though elsewhere it describes the same policy as a phaseout. The article otherwise attributes the industry's warnings and gives the city's public health case and the small share of state production at stake.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “the city’s drilling crackdown”

    Why this matters
    The Post calls the council's measure a "drilling crackdown" in its own voice, not in a quotation.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking the city is taking heavy-handed punitive action against oil producers.
    The context
    The Post itself describes the policy as a 20-year phaseout passed by a unanimous vote after years of legal process. Nothing in the article supports a verdict of heavy-handedness; that is the oil companies' view of it.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“a sweeping 20-year phaseout of oil drilling”

    Show it in the article

    “Yaroslavsky defended the crackdown as an urgent public health measure”

    Why this matters
    The Post uses "crackdown" again to name the policy, this time while reporting the councilwoman's public health case for it.
    The impression it gives
    The reader is told the policy is a crackdown in the outlet's voice and that its supporter's public health reasons are a defence of it.
    The context
    The councilwoman describes it as a public health and zoning measure. The Post's own neutral description elsewhere is a phaseout, so the loaded label is the outlet's choice of words.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“a sweeping 20-year shutdown of oil drilling”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “accounting for just 1.4% of California’s total production, according to city planning documents”

    The Post gives a sourced figure for how small the city's oil output is, which lets readers weigh the industry's warnings about gas prices and foreign oil.

  • “They’re bad for the environment, and they make people sick”

    The article gives the council's public health reason for the measure in a council member's own words, not just the industry's objections.

  • “have fueled concerns about pollution near homes and schools”

    The Post states the scale of drilling in the city and why residents are concerned, giving the reader the reason behind the vote.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from New York Post

  1. 28 OctPopular SoCal pub keeps the beer flowing despite flooding, high tides along boardwalk0.0
  2. 28 OctApocalyptic Super El Niño map shows where most people will die from record-breaking calamity6.0
  3. 27 OctCalifornia coast hit with monster tides, flooding streets as forecast calls for even more chaos3.0
  4. 27 OctLA can't afford a 'Green New Deal' — keep the plants open0.0
  5. 27 OctCalifornia utility grid reliabilty faces questions as state phases out natural gas plants0.0

Everything we scored from New York Post