BBC News, on Climate, 8 November 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

Bedfordshire solar farm could harm food security, council says

No framing issues found.

Solar farm could harm food security, council says Image source, Press Association Image caption, Cople Parish Council said it would continue to object to the plans By Matthew Lockwood , Bedfordshire, Hertfordshire and Buckinghamshire and Euan Duncan , Local Democracy reporter Published 5 hours ago A parish council has raised strong objections to a planned solar farm on agricultural land that could generate enough electricity to power more than 15,000 homes a year.

The development would cover about 260 acres of land on the Shuttleworth Estate near Sheerhatch Wood in Bedfordshire. In an open letter, Jason Whaley, chairman of Cople Parish Council, said the proposal would "undermine food security". The Shuttleworth Trust, which owns the land, said: "Matters relating to the planning application process will be considered through the appropriate statutory channels." A public consultation on the plans has closed.

On the project's own website , external , Quintas Cleantech, the developer, said the location was chosen because it was a "great spot" for a solar farm, as the land was "relatively flat and doesn't cover any protected landscape areas". The company is working on more than 10 proposals across the UK. The Bedfordshire solar farm would have a capacity of 49.9MW. A 15MW battery would store excess energy generated by the solar panels during the day, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.

However, Whaley said the proposal was not "appropriate" or "proportionate". High-quality agricultural farmland would be lost, he said, and there would be an increase in traffic and noise. He urged planners to give serious consideration to Historic England's , external conclusion that a solar farm would negatively impact a Romano-British settlement that is adjacent to the site. It would also undermine the Shuttleworth Trust's farming objectives, he added.

Image source, Holly Nichols/BBC Image caption, The developer has said the Shuttleworth Estate provides a "great spot" for a solar farm The Shuttleworth Estate said its trustees were responsible for managing the estate in the "most effective and sustainable way". "Any commercial arrangements relating to the estate are confidential between the parties involved and we are therefore unable to comment on their details." The application is yet to be decided upon by Bedford Borough Council's planning committee.

The council first received the application in May 2025. The BBC has contacted Quintas Cleantech for comment. Do you have a story suggestion for Beds, Herts or Bucks? Contact us below. Get in touch Your Voice Contact form Contact form Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds , Facebook , external , Instagram , external and X , external . Related topics Solar power Bedford Renewable energy Cople Northill More on this story Bringing landfill into the 21st Century with solar power Published 26 October Government gives go-ahead to major solar farm Published 8 October More solar farms on the way after record renewables auction Published 10 February Related internet links Cople Parish Council Sheerhatch Solar Historic England

Read the original article on bbc.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

BBC News reports a parish council's objections to a planned solar farm on the Shuttleworth Estate in Bedfordshire, alongside the developer's reasons for the site, the landowner's response and the fact that the application is still undecided. The food security claim is attributed to the council in both headline and body, and the article gives what the project would supply. Nothing in it misleads the reader.

What it gets right

  • “could harm food security, council says”

    The headline keeps the food security claim as the parish council's view rather than stating it as fact.

  • “could generate enough electricity to power more than 15,000 homes a year”

    The article says what the solar farm would deliver, so the objection is not presented as the only side of the picture.

  • “the land was "relatively flat and doesn't cover any protected landscape areas"”

    The developer's reasons for choosing the site are quoted directly, giving readers its case alongside the objections.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from BBC News

  1. 8 NovNorth Pennines National Landscape prepares for climate change0.0
  2. 8 NovElectric ambulances to be rolled out in East Midlands0.0
  3. 7 NovDrought and hot weather threatens future of Christmas trees, farmer warns3.0
  4. 7 NovFuture Christmas tree numbers to be hit by extreme weather, say farmers6.0
  5. 7 NovWork to restore New Forest wildfire site gets under way0.0

Everything we scored from BBC News