HuffPost UK, by Kate Nicholson, on UK Politics, 28 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

'Have A Little Humility': Andy Burnham Kemi Badenoch Over Brexit Deal

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Andy Burnham has told Kemi Badenoch to have “a little humility” over the legacy of the Conservatives ’ Brexit deal. Speaking during prime minister’s questions, the Tory leader criticised Burnham for suggesting the UK could agree to freedom of movement with the EU in his quest to forge closer ties with the trade bloc. But Burnham . The prime minister pointed out that in January 2025, Badenoch herself admitted it was a “mistake for the Conservative Party to leave the European Union before we had a plan for growth outside the EU”.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article does not say that Downing Street officials had said Burnham's suggestion on freedom of movement was not government policy. That gap is the source of the confusion Badenoch was attacking. Without it, a reader sees Burnham's remarks as a settled position rather than one his own officials had distanced themselves from.

How we know

Burnham continued: “She may as well have said it was a mistake to leave the EU without a plan in place to control migration. “Because that is what led to the Boris -wave during the government that she was in moved away from revolving door migration to long-term settlement.” He said that’s why his home secretary Shabana Mahmood is reforming the migration system. “Let’s have a little humility from the benches opposite that left Britain with low growth and migration out of control,” he added.

Badenoch said: “I stand by my words! When we make mistakes we own up to them, they pretend they never do anything wrong.” “That is the difference between him and I,” she said, reminding the PM that he had insisted on respecting the referendum result only earlier this year. But Burnham insisted: “The red lines in the manifesto are clearly in place.” The PM deflected by reminding the Tory leader that she has previously refused to say if she really thinks the EU exit deal improved the UK.

Badenoch insisted that it did, adding: “He is using those freedoms today, but he doesn’t want to admit that.” She added that the country was “paralysed and miserable” during the Brexit wars, and claimed: “Does the prime minister really think the country wants to reopen that debate?” But Burnham hit back: “Now she is speaking the truth. The country was paralysed by the party opposite. Low growth, insufficient control on migration, that is what this side of the House is dealing with.”

The prime minister told Makerfield constituents – who voted Leave in 2016 – that he would not “re-run” arguments from 2016 when he campaigning to be their MP earlier this year. However, since getting into No.10, Burnham has been accused of reigniting the debate by pointing out the negative impact leaving the EU has had on the UK. On Monday, he said: “I’ve said I’m going to be honest and say, in my lifetime I would like to see that happen, but I am not going to move ahead of the public.

“I am not going to dictate in terms of my own opinions here, you have to make sure that the British public are the bosses.” Burnham added: “I said we wouldn’t rerun the referendum and that’s not what I’m doing. “The British public, the people of Makerfield, will be the bosses here. They will decide what happens in relation to Brexit .” Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed.

Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Read the original article on huffingtonpost.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

HuffPost UK reports a PMQs exchange on Brexit between Andy Burnham and Kemi Badenoch, quoting both leaders at length and in their own words. In its own voice it leans towards Burnham as the winner, with "Torches" in the headline and "turned the tables" in the body. It also leaves out that Downing Street had distanced itself from his freedom of movement remarks. Neither problem changes what a reader learns about what was said.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Torches”

    Why this matters
    The headline uses "Torches" in HuffPost's own voice to declare that Burnham won the exchange outright.
    The impression it gives
    A reader expects a one-sided rout in which Badenoch was left with no answer.
    The context
    The body reports a back and forth. Badenoch replies in her own words and gets lines in, and the article itself says Burnham "deflected". Other outlets read the same exchange the opposite way, as a win for Badenoch.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “turned the tables back on Badenoch”

    Why this matters
    The article uses this phrase in its own voice to tell the reader that Burnham's reply defeated Badenoch's point, rather than simply reporting what he said in answer.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it that Burnham neutralised the freedom of movement criticism.
    The context
    Burnham's reply answers a different point, about the Conservatives' record on growth and migration. The criticism about freedom of movement is not answered in the passage that follows.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“criticised Burnham for suggesting the UK could agree to freedom of movement”

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article does not say that Downing Street officials had said Burnham's suggestion on freedom of movement was not government policy. That gap is the source of the confusion Badenoch was attacking. Without it, a reader sees Burnham's remarks as a settled position rather than one his own officials had distanced themselves from.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “Badenoch said: “I stand by my words!”

    It gives the opposition leader her answer in her own words rather than only through Burnham's account of what she said.

  • “Burnham has been accused of reigniting the debate by pointing out the negative impact leaving the EU has had on the UK”

    It reports the criticism of the prime minister alongside his own defence, so the reader hears the charge as well as his reply.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from HuffPost UK

  1. 28 Oct'So You're A Lettuce Fan?' Piers Morgan Probes Liz Truss Over Her Catastrophic Premiership3.0
  2. 27 Oct'No Respect For The Young': Burnham Slammed Amid Reports Over National Minimum Wage3.0
  3. 27 OctLiz Truss Bewildered By Suggestion She Do Her Own Economic Research3.0
  4. 27 OctAll 5 'Fixes' Andy Burnham Says Will Make Costs Easier Ahead Of 2026's Budget0.0
  5. 27 OctBBC's Nick Robinson Corners Farage Over Reform's Hefty Foreign Donations In Toe-Curling Interview3.0

Everything we scored from HuffPost UK