Al-Monitor, on UK Politics, 27 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Two charged with UK security offences over airbase plot: police

Findings are available in the analysis below.3 findings

UK anti-terrorism police said Tuesday two men have been charged with national security offences after an incident last month at a British airbase used by the United States, linking the scare to Iran. The head of National Counter Terrorism Policing, Laurence Taylor, said two British men aged 24 had been charged: one with assisting a foreign intelligence service, believed to be in Iran, and another with entering a prohibited place for a purpose "prejudicial" to the UK.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article calls Fairford only a base "used by the United States". It does not say the base is used to launch US strikes on Iran, which other outlets and its own earlier report gave.

How we know

This is the first time that anyone has been charged over the incident at RAF Fairford, after police arrested seven suspects in the days afterwards, before releasing them on bail. Police were called to the Royal Air Force's Fairford base in southwest England in the early hours of September 27 after a local farmer reported a group of men with several white vans engaged in "suspicious" activity. "While some of the circumstances remain unclear, we are confident that this activity was conducted on behalf of a foreign intelligence service," Taylor told reporters on Tuesday outside Metropolitan Police headquarters in London.

Days after the incident the United States withdrew all its B-1 bombers from the base. - Suspects charged - A week ago police said they had re-arrested two of the suspects, one of whom has now been charged. Police charged 24-year-old Nouman Essghir with entering or approaching a "prohibited place" for a purpose "prejudicial" to the interests of the United Kingdom. Essghir was arrested at the scene in Gloucestershire and then released on bail, before police re-arrested him a week ago.

The police chief said the charge against Essghir related to "suspected activity" more than a month earlier, on Saturday 22 August, without giving any details. The second man who has been charged, 24-year-old Mohmed Ahmad Abdulkarim, was arrested after being interviewed under caution over the last week, police said. He has been charged with assisting a foreign intelligence service. "In this case, we believe that country to be Iran," the police said.

Taylor said Counter Terrorism Policing had seen "a range of incidents in recent months that we believe have been directed by the Iranian state". "This is not a theoretical threat. This is something we are responding to every day," he added. Both of the charged men live in Westminster, a district in central London. Six other men remain on bail, one of them a dual UK-Iranian national who had been re-arrested last week. Taylor acknowledged that some of the police's "decisions made during our investigations can sometimes appear illogical".

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says that Iran has denied involvement. It carries only the police account that the activity was directed by the Iranian state.

How we know

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article says the dual UK-Iranian national remains on bail after re-arrest. It does not say he was released without charge over the suspicion of aiding Iran's intelligence service.

How we know

"But I want to make it very clear that there will always be a good reason or rationale behind them," he said. am-jkb/rlp

Read the original article on al-monitor.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

AFP reports the charging of two men over the RAF Fairford incident and attributes the Iran link to the police throughout. It leaves out Iran's denial and the base's use for US strikes on Iran. It also leaves out that the dual national was released without charge over the suspicion of aiding Iran's intelligence service.

  1. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says that Iran has denied involvement. It carries only the police account that the activity was directed by the Iranian state.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article calls Fairford only a base "used by the United States". It does not say the base is used to launch US strikes on Iran, which other outlets and its own earlier report gave.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article says the dual UK-Iranian national remains on bail after re-arrest. It does not say he was released without charge over the suspicion of aiding Iran's intelligence service.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “"In this case, we believe that country to be Iran," the police said.”

    The article keeps the Iran link as the police's stated belief and does not adopt it as its own finding.

  • “believed to be in Iran”

    The charge is reported with the attribution and uncertainty the police gave it.

  • “UK anti-terrorism police said Tuesday”

    The opening sentence puts the source of the allegation up front.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Al-Monitor

Everything we scored from Al-Monitor