Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on Gaza, 13 November 2026

9.4out of 10Severe

IDF eliminates over 10 terrorists in Gaza,

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findingsSee them marked on israelnationalnews.com

In several strikes throughout the Gaza Strip over the past week, the IDF and Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) . According to a joint IDF and Shin Bet announcement, among the terrorists eliminated were: Muhammad Ata Zaki Kishawi, a Nukhba terrorist in Hamas’ military wing.

Hamas terrorists eliminated in past week IDF Spokesperson's Unit Also eliminated was , an operative in the Saif al-Islam faction who took part in manufacturing weapons as part of a workshop that the IDF and Shin Bet dismantled. The terrorists operated at the workshop under the production headquarters of Hamas’ military wing in order to manufacture weapons intended to harm Israeli civilians and IDF troops.

, a supply company commander in the Sabra Battalion under Hamas' military wing, . The statement noted that prior to the strikes, measures were taken to minimize harm to civilians, including the use of precision munitions and aerial surveillance. “The security forces under the Southern Command remain deployed in the area in accordance with the agreement and will continue to operate to remove any threat," it concluded. (Arutz Sheva-Israel National News' North American desk is keeping you updated until the start of Shabbat in New York.

The time posted automatically on all Israel National News articles, however, is Israeli time.)

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

Arutz Sheva turns a joint IOF and Shin Bet announcement into its own account. It writes the killings out as "eliminated", calls the dead men terrorists in its own voice on the army's word alone, and states the army's claims about October 7 and ceasefire violations as fact, including in the headline.

  1. Writes the death out

    Severe

    “eliminated”

    Why this matters
    The lead sentence repeats "eliminated" in the outlet's own voice to describe what the strikes did.
    The impression it gives
    The opening paragraph, which most readers stop at, never tells them anyone died.
    The context
    The same event is reported elsewhere as killing: "Among those killed was Muhammad Ata Zaki Kishawi".

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “was among those eliminated”

    Why this matters
    A named man's death is written as being "among those eliminated".
    The impression it gives
    Hani Ibrahim Said Khudri was processed out of a list rather than killed.
    The context
    Khudri was killed. The Jerusalem Post writes that the IOF and Shin Bet "also killed" him.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli occupation forces and the Shin Bet killed more than 10 people in strikes across Gaza over the past week, the army said.

  2. Labels people on one side's word

    Severe

    “more than 10 terrorists”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls all the dead "terrorists" in its own voice, with no attribution in the sentence.
    The impression it gives
    Every person killed is established as a terrorist.
    The context
    The only basis the article gives for who these men were is the army's own statement, which S2 attributes: "According to a joint IDF and Shin Bet announcement". No independent source is offered.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“According to a joint IDF and Shin Bet announcement”

    Show it in the article

    “terrorist Ali Na’im Aish Abu Asei”

    Why this matters
    The outlet puts "terrorist" in front of a named dead man's name as if it were his title.
    The impression it gives
    Abu Asei's status as a terrorist is a settled fact.
    The context
    The description of his role comes only from the army and Shin Bet. The Jerusalem Post introduces him as "identified in the statement".

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “Terrorist Hani Ibrahim Said Khudri”

    Why this matters
    The sentence opens by labelling another named dead man "Terrorist" in the outlet's voice.
    The impression it gives
    The outlet has verified who Khudri was.
    The context
    The article's only source is the joint army and Shin Bet announcement. It gives no other basis.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“According to a joint IDF and Shin Bet announcement”

    Show it in the article

  3. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “who advanced terror attacks against IDF troops and Israeli civilians and operated to restore the capabilities of the Hamas terrorist organization, in systematic violation of the ceasefire”

    Why this matters
    The outlet states the army's justification for the strikes as its own finding, with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    It is established that every person killed was planning attacks and breaking the ceasefire.
    The context
    This is the wording of the army and Shin Bet statement. The Jerusalem Post prints it as a quotation from that statement.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “The terrorist infiltrated Israeli territory during the October 7th Massacre.”

    Why this matters
    The outlet asserts in its own voice that Kishawi took part in the October 7 attack.
    The impression it gives
    Kishawi's part in October 7 is a verified fact.
    The context
    This rests on the army's claim. The Jerusalem Post adds "according to the military" to the same detail.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “The terrorist infiltrated Israeli territory during the October 7th Massacre.”

    Why this matters
    The outlet repeats the same unattributed sentence for a second man, Khudri.
    The impression it gives
    A second man's role in October 7 is independently established.
    The context
    The only source in the article is the joint army and Shin Bet announcement named in S2.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“According to a joint IDF and Shin Bet announcement”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The army and Shin Bet said the men had planned attacks and violated the ceasefire, and that two had taken part in the October 7 attack.

  4. Headline goes beyond the article

    Serious

    “including October 7 attackers”

    Why this matters
    The headline states as fact that October 7 attackers were among the dead and drops the attribution the body gives.
    The impression it gives
    It is confirmed that those killed included October 7 attackers.
    The context
    The body attributes the identities to the army: "According to a joint IDF and Shin Bet announcement". Most readers see only the headline.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“According to a joint IDF and Shin Bet announcement”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli strikes kill more than 10 in Gaza; army says dead include October 7 attackers

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 13 NovHe lost a leg in Gaza. Now a first-time father: "This is our victory"0.0
  2. 13 NovIDF: Over 93,000 tents enter Gaza ahead of winter6.0
  3. 13 NovDemilitarization plan becomes a gift to Hamas6.0
  4. 12 NovDozens of nations demand more Gaza aid, Israel blames Hamas for crisis7.3
  5. 12 NovIDF exposes Hamas headquarters inside Gaza hospital where hostages were held9.5

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News