NPR, on Iran, 26 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Iran says it's prepared to go back to war amid threat from the U.S. and Israel

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

Iran says it's prepared to go back to war amid threat from the U.S. and Israel Iran says it’s prepared to go back to war amid threat from the U.S. and Israel ?Iran is preparing for a potential attack from the U.S. and Israel after the midterms. LEILA FADEL, HOST: Iran is preparing for a possible attack after American elections next week. And , quote, "out of proportion, stronger than you can ever imagine."

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The piece ties the threat only to the American elections. It never says Israel holds its own general election that week. It also leaves out Israeli reports of a row between Netanyahu and army chief Eyal Zamir over a swift strike, and the opposition's charge that Netanyahu wants to attack Iran to sway the vote. Without these facts a reader sees the Israeli threat only as a response to Iran, not also as part of Israeli election politics.

How we know

So how is Iran responding to these threats? For that, we turn to NPR international correspondent in Istanbul, Hadeel Al-Shalchi. Good morning, Hadeel. HADEEL AL-SHALCHI, BYLINE: Good morning. FADEL: So what are we hearing from the Iranian government? AL-SHALCHI: It's a really defiant tone. We've heard from Iran's security chief, from the president, that Iran is ready. The Iranian foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, has said repeatedly that Iran prefers diplomacy.

But the foreign ministry's spokesperson said today that Iran will act, quote, "decisively" against any threats. Leila, I asked Iran expert Trita Parsi of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft - if we were a fly on the wall in the Iranian leaders' meetings today, what would we hear? And he said, a lot of concern. TRITA PARSI: They have very high confidence in their own capability of striking back, but that this ultimately will lead to a very bad situation for Iran and for the region and the future of Iran's relationship with many of its neighbors.

AL-SHALCHI: Of course, those neighbors include Gulf countries that have had to suffer the consequences of the war. Iran retaliates by targeting U.S. bases in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the UAE - countries that are not built for this kind of attack. FADEL: So we heard there that Iran is confident that it can respond militarily. Why is it so confident? AL-SHALCHI: Well, even though it's been hit repeatedly by, you know, some of the most powerful militaries in the world, Iran's military is still functioning, and it's able to hit back.

We know that damage has been done to Iran's military infrastructure, and we don't know exactly how badly it's been hit. But even though President Trump has claimed that most of it was destroyed after the first round of strikes, Iran came back even more forcefully in the second round. And even today, tankers on the Strait of Hormuz are still being targeted. Parsi and others I've spoken to tell me that we have to consider that Iran's internal military supply chain is actually very robust.

You know, Iran has had a defense production sector that has operated in isolation for more than 50 years. It still gets missile ingredients from China and Russia, so it could continue production of its arsenal. And, you know, also something Parsi told me that Trump has underestimated is the robustness of Iran's institutions. PARSI: The Iranians have put into place a system that immediately replaces everyone and in which large parts of the military is operating independently.

So even if central command and control collapses, these entities would continue to operate on their own. AL-SHALCHI: So this has become . The system is created to resist and survive until it can't anymore. FADEL: If the U.S. and Israel attack again, it is the people inside Iran who will feel that the most. What are you hearing from them? AL-SHALCHI: They're tired. They're nervous. They're ready for the war to be over.

Inflation has been hovering at almost 90% in Iran since the war started. The cost of bread, meat has skyrocketed. Medicine has become scarce, and schools have been interrupted frequently. You know, there's also been talk of hitting things like electricity grids this time. So life is really unbearable for so many inside Iran. And now people like 41-year-old Meysam Ali from eastern Tehran will have to bear bombings again. MEYSAM ALI: (Speaking Persian).

AL-SHALCHI: "Uncertainty and anxiety," he says. His family may need to evacuate their home if his area is struck again, like in the last rounds. And, you know, I asked some of those people, who do you blame? And many of them at this point just don't care. The U.S., Israel, their own government - they just want it to end. FADEL: NPR's Hadeel Al-Shalchi in Istanbul. Thank you, Hadeel. AL-SHALCHI: You're welcome. (SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC) Copyright © 2026 NPR.

All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information. Accuracy and availability of transcripts for NPR programming may vary. Transcript text may also be revised to correct errors or match updates to audio. Audio may be edited after its original broadcast or publication. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record. Please note that NPR platforms and products also include some programming produced by third parties; NPR cannot guarantee transcripts for that content and some transcripts may be produced using automated or other tools.

Read the original article on npr.org (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

NPR's interview gives Iranian officials, an analyst and an ordinary Tehran resident room to speak. It names the US and Israel as the ones threatening attack and keeps Trump's claims marked as his. The faults are minor: the correspondent calls Iran's government "the regime" in her own voice, and the host credits a threat to "the Israeli military" when other reporting shows Netanyahu said it.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “a fight for the regime's existence”

    Why this matters
    The correspondent calls Iran's government "the regime" in her own voice, not in a quote.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes in a verdict that Iran's government is something less than a government, delivered as neutral description.
    The context
    Elsewhere the correspondent and host say "the Iranian government" and "Iran's security chief". Nothing in the facts reported here supports the change of word, which carries a judgement.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“what are we hearing from the Iranian government”

    Show it in the article

  2. Misattributes a quoted threat

    Minor

    “the Israeli military is warning that it will launch strikes”

    Why this matters
    The host credits the quoted threat to "the Israeli military" as an institution.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes the threat of disproportionate strikes came from the army.
    The context
    Other reporting the same weekend shows Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made the threat himself, in a video he shared from an anti-missile battery. That reporting quotes his words as "even imagine", not "ever imagine".

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The piece ties the threat only to the American elections. It never says Israel holds its own general election that week. It also leaves out Israeli reports of a row between Netanyahu and army chief Eyal Zamir over a swift strike, and the opposition's charge that Netanyahu wants to attack Iran to sway the vote. Without these facts a reader sees the Israeli threat only as a response to Iran, not also as part of Israeli election politics.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “President Trump has claimed that most of it was destroyed”

    NPR marks Trump's damage claim as his claim and sets Iran's later strikes against it, rather than stating US assessments as fact.

  • “If the U.S. and Israel attack again”

    The host names the US and Israel as the attackers in the active voice, rather than writing of strikes with no actor.

  • “The U.S., Israel, their own government - they just want it to end.”

    The correspondent keeps Iranian people separate from Iran's government and reports their own views, rather than treating them as interchangeable.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from NPR

Everything we scored from NPR

See how 13 outlets covered this story