Daily Mirror, on UK Politics, 10 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

say MPs in 'e-pimps' warning

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

have demanded an overhaul of laws for sites like OnlyFans to get a grip of 'webcamming' exploitation. A cross-party group has called for live-streaming of sex acts to be banned - warning there is no way this can be made safe. It also said 'e-pimps' and agencies who profit from someone else's live sexual performances must face criminal sanctions. The All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Commercial Sexual Exploitation said the government must get to grips with "webcamming" - where viewers pay to watch a person strip or perform sex acts live.

Labour MP Tracy Gilbert, who chairs the APPG, said: "The webcamming trade is a magnet for exploiters. These e-pimps style themselves as legitimate ‘managers’ and agencies, yet they exert sexual coercion and control over the women they recruit and profit from. "Webcamming platforms are currently treated in policy and regulation like ‘regular’ pornography websites, but they are different. The activity is performed live; by definition, it cannot be pre-screened to prevent against the creation and distribution of illegal content and serious harms to women and children."

And she said these sites largely function "beyond the reach of the law" as they are hidden behind paywalls that authorities cannot get around. Ms Gilbert warned that allowing viewers to direct performers on webcams normalises exploitation, stating: " It is time for Government to act." The report points to a BBC investigation into OnlyFans, which found that of 60 performers on the platform, 83% had felt pressured by their agency or 'manager’ to record increasingly explicit sexual material.

And it found ‘managers’ were taking up to 70% of performers’ earnings. The Mirror has contacted OnlyFans for comment. Eleanor Lyons, the UK’s Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner, said: "Behind the profiles and the payments are people who have experienced coercion, exploitation and abuse, while others have profited from their suffering. “Much of what is described in this report reflects what I have heard time and again through my own work on the role Adult Services Websites play in enabling exploitation.

Behind different platforms and different technologies, the same patterns emerge with people being exploited for profit, abuse hidden behind a screen, and profound harm inflicted on victims." She continued: "Without action, these harms risk becoming harder to detect, harder to prevent, and easier for perpetrators to profit from. We must be clear that no business model, platform or technology can justify the exploitation of people for profit."

A government spokesperson said: “Our commitment to halving violence against women and girls within a decade includes tackling the serious exploitation and abuse associated with prostitution. As part of this, we are reviewing the law on prostitution, and strengthening the law enforcement response to adult sexual exploitation. “In addition, the Online Safety Act places legal duties on platforms to proactively tackle the most harmful illegal content, much of which contributes to the degradation of women and girls.”

Read the original article on mirror.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Mirror reports an all-party parliamentary group's call to ban live-streamed sex acts and to criminalise 'e-pimps', quoting its chair, the Anti-Slavery Commissioner and a government spokesperson. It adds an unattributed 'Horrified' to the MPs, its headline narrows a general call into one about OnlyFans, and no performer or sex worker is heard. These are small flaws in an otherwise attributed report.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Horrified MPs”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Mirror calls the MPs "Horrified", an emotional verdict that no quoted MP states.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it that the MPs are reacting with shock to newly uncovered abuse, not presenting a policy report.
    The context
    The article quotes the chair calling webcamming "a magnet for exploiters" and urging the government to act. Nobody in it says they were horrified. The word is the outlet's own colour.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The webcamming trade is a magnet for exploiters”
    • Elsewhere in the article“It is time for Government to act”

    Show it in the article

  2. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “OnlyFans livestreaming must be banned”

    Why this matters
    The headline names one company and says its livestreaming must be banned.
    The impression it gives
    A reader thinks the MPs singled out OnlyFans for a ban.
    The context
    The body reports a general call to ban live-streaming of sex acts and an overhaul of laws for "sites like OnlyFans". OnlyFans appears only as an example and as the subject of a BBC investigation the report cites.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“called for live-streaming of sex acts to be banned”
    • Elsewhere in the article“laws for sites like OnlyFans”

    Show it in the article

  3. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “No woman or girl is unaffected by today’s normalised webcamming trade.”

    Why this matters
    The article lets the APPG chair speak for every woman and girl, and the only further voices it adds also back the call for action.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking the people who work on these platforms have nothing to say about a proposed ban on their work.
    The context
    Performers, the people a ban would most directly affect, are never quoted. The only response sought from the industry is a note that OnlyFans was contacted.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The Mirror has contacted OnlyFans for comment”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “The report points to a BBC investigation into OnlyFans, which found that of 60 performers on the platform, 83% had felt pressured”

    It gives the source and the sample size behind the percentage rather than presenting it as a general fact.

  • “The Mirror has contacted OnlyFans for comment.”

    It tells the reader that the company named in the headline was approached for a response.

  • “A government spokesperson said:”

    It reports the government's response to the demand in its own attributed words.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Mirror

  1. 10 NovPolice settle debate on mobile phone use at drive-thru — £200 fine3.0
  2. 10 NovDWP sets record straight over 2026 Cost of Living payments0.0
  3. 9 NovUniversal Credit shake-up demand to prevent job 'gamble' for young0.0
  4. 9 NovSociety must act to help 1.25 million white working class pupils, inquiry says0.0
  5. 9 NovUpdate on DWP 'cold weather' payments to people on 4 benefits0.0

Everything we scored from Daily Mirror