New York Post, on Gaza, 12 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Benjamin Netanyahu calls for criminal probe of 'NAZA' documentary's anonymous IDF sources

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.6 findings

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday night called on the IDF chief of staff, the head of the Israeli Security Agency (Shin Bet), and Israel’s Attorney General to launch an investigation into those who participated in the film “ NAZA ,” whose central claim is that the Israel Defense Forces systematically targeted Palestinian civilians . The documentary features anonymous testimony from 24 Israeli military and intelligence personnel and alleges that the IDF used intelligence systems and artificial intelligence in ways that contributed to civilian deaths in Gaza.

Left out here: Hedges the documented record

The article never says that Netanyahu, who is demanding the prosecution of soldiers who testified about civilian killings in Gaza, is himself subject to an ICC arrest warrant over Gaza. It also never mentions the genocide finding. Without this, a reader sees a neutral security and defamation complaint, not a man charged over the same conduct seeking to punish the witnesses.

How we know

Interviewees also allege that the military deliberately targeted civilians and permitted large numbers of civilian casualties . 6 Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks at a state memorial ceremony in memory of those killed in the Oct. 7, 2023. Debbie Hill/Pool UPI via AP In a letter issued to Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, Shin Bet head David Zini and Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara, Netanyahu demands that those involved in “NAZA” be brought to trial for “serious information security offenses, criminal defamation, and harming Israel’s diplomatic and security interests,” according to the Prime Minister’s Office in Jerusalem.

“The film is riddled with falsehoods, distortions, deception, and manipulation, and makes malicious accusations against the State of Israel and the IDF,” Netanyahu writes. “It harms Israel’s standing in the world and severely damages Israel’s international standing,” he continues. 6 Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor and a Palestinian flag during the 74th San Sebastian International Film Festival closing ceremony in San Sebastian, Spain, on Sept. 26.

AFP via Getty Images Explore More Teaching assistant groomed student, 15, by showing him her sex toys and handcuffs — before a colleague caught her Man fatally mauled by tiger prayed, bowed down to big cat inside wildlife enclosure after stranger tried to pull him back Sex pest robot that looks like ‘Iron Man’ gropes, thrusts into teen girl The letter goes on to mention the 17-page response issued by the IDF Spokesperson’s Unit against the claims made in the film.

Beyond the harm to Israel’s image due caused by the film, the letter continues, there is concern that serving and discharged soldiers from the IDF’s Unit 8200 who gave testimony for the film “committed serious criminal offenses involving the exposure of classified information, and caused a breach of information security within a highly sensitive intelligence unit.” Netanyahu urges the three officials to disclose the identities of those who participated in the film and initiate a criminal investigation against them.

“Please handle this matter with the utmost urgency, each within your respective authority under the law,” the letter adds. 6 Rachel Szor, left, and Yuval Abraham pose with the Special Jury Prize Award for “Naza” at the Winners Photocall during the 83rd Venice International Film Festival at Sala Grande in Venice, Italy, on Sept. 12. WireImage Zamir, Zini and Baharav-Miara have yet to respond to the request. Israeli Culture and Sports Minister Miki Zohar, who is also a member of Netanyahu’s Likud Party, congratulated the prime minister on the demand “to prosecute the creators of the abominable film ‘NAZA’ for serious information offenses and criminal defamation.” 6 “NAZA,” whose title is derived from the Hebrew acronym for “collateral damage,” has drawn international attention since winning the Special Jury Prize at the 83rd Venice International Film Festival on Sept. 12.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article says the three officials have yet to respond. It does not report that Zamir separately ordered military units to identify the soldiers in the film. A reader may think no action has been taken against them.

How we know

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article presents Zohar as merely congratulating Netanyahu. It leaves out that he had asked for the filmmakers' citizenship to be revoked and accused them of treason, which shows how far the government's campaign against them goes.

How we know

Getty Images He added, “We must not allow its content to harm IDF soldiers and the state.” IDF: Filmmakers present ‘misleading and disingenuous’ account of military conduct “NAZA,” whose title is derived from the Hebrew acronym for “collateral damage,” has drawn international attention since winning the Special Jury Prize at the 83rd Venice International Film Festival on Sept. 12. The IDF has vehemently denied the film’s main claims. 6 “We must not allow its content to harm IDF soldiers and the state,” said Netanyahu.

Debbie Hill/Pool UPI via AP It accused its filmmakers of presenting a “distorted, misleading and disingenuous” account of how the military selects and strikes targets in the Gaza Strip. According to the military, binding IDF directives distinguish between terrorists and uninvolved civilians, prohibit deliberately targeting civilians and require commanders to minimize the risk of civilian harm to the greatest extent feasible. 6 People protested the “NAZA” film outside Sag Harbor Cinema during the Hamptons International Film Festival on Oct. 3.

Getty Images The IDF said it had never planned, approved or carried out a strike in Gaza in which 500 civilians, or anything approaching that number, were expected to be killed, contrary to an allegation made in the film. It also rejected claims that artificial intelligence independently selects targets for attack. “Artificial intelligence has never independently selected targets to strike in the IDF,” the military said. According to the IDF, .

Read the original article on nypost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (6)

The New York Post ends its report on the IOF's account of its targeting process, with no reply from the filmmakers or the 24 soldiers who testified. In its own voice it calls Israel's genocide in Gaza 'the war against Hamas' and calls the strikes' targets 'terrorist operatives'. It also leaves out that Netanyahu is wanted by the ICC over Gaza, that Zamir has already ordered the soldiers identified, and that Zohar accused the filmmakers of treason.

  1. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “authorized intelligence officers identify potential targets, relevant professionals plan strikes, and operational commanders make the final decision on whether to attack”

    Why this matters
    The article ends on the IOF's description of its targeting chain. No reply from the filmmakers or the testifying soldiers follows.
    The impression it gives
    The last thing a reader hears is that a careful human process governs every strike, so the film's claims look answered.
    The context
    The soldiers' testimony describes AI tools used to identify people to kill and an acronym for expected civilian dead. The article quotes none of the filmmakers and none of that testimony, so the IOF's account stands unanswered.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Tells the event as something else

    Minor

    “during the war against Hamas in Gaza”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Post calls what the film documents 'the war against Hamas in Gaza'.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the film's subject to be a two-sided war against one armed group, with the soldiers' testimony about civilian deaths as a disputed side claim.
    The context
    The UN Commission of Inquiry has found that Israel committed genocide in Gaza. Other coverage of this same event describes Israel's 'genocidal war in Gaza'. The word genocide appears nowhere in the article.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “in attacks on terrorist operatives”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Post calls the targets of the strikes the soldiers describe 'terrorist operatives'.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as given that the strikes were aimed at fighters and that civilians were only a side effect.
    The context
    That is the IOF's account. The film's central claim, as the article itself says, is that civilians were systematically targeted.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“systematically targeted Palestinian civilians”

    Show it in the article

  4. Hedges the documented record

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says that Netanyahu, who is demanding the prosecution of soldiers who testified about civilian killings in Gaza, is himself subject to an ICC arrest warrant over Gaza. It also never mentions the genocide finding. Without this, a reader sees a neutral security and defamation complaint, not a man charged over the same conduct seeking to punish the witnesses.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  5. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article says the three officials have yet to respond. It does not report that Zamir separately ordered military units to identify the soldiers in the film. A reader may think no action has been taken against them.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  6. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article presents Zohar as merely congratulating Netanyahu. It leaves out that he had asked for the filmmakers' citizenship to be revoked and accused them of treason, which shows how far the government's campaign against them goes.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from New York Post

Everything we scored from New York Post