Jacobin, on West Bank, 30 October 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

A Palestinian Prisoner on the Nightmare Behind Israeli Bars

No framing issues found.

Interview by Jacobin B orn in Nablus in 1963, Khalida Jarrar is one of the foremost voices of the Palestinian left — feminist, secular, socialist — and one of the towering figures of the political prisoners’ movement. For more than a decade she led Addameer, the main Palestinian prisoner support organization. In 2006, voters elected her to the Palestinian Legislative Council, where she chaired the prisoners’ commission, and she later served on the national committee that prepared Palestine’s accession to the International Criminal Court.

Today she is a researcher at the Muwatin Institute at Birzeit University, where she is conducting a pioneering study of the class and gender dimensions of the women prisoners’ movement since 1967. She has paid for each of these roles with her own freedom. Israel has imprisoned her five times, for a total of more than six years behind bars. Almost every time, Israel held her under “administrative detention,” a system it inherited from British colonial emergency law.

It allows indefinite imprisonment on the basis of a “secret file,” without charge, without trial, and without a lawyer able to contest what cannot be read. In 2014, when the Israeli army ordered Jarrar’s expulsion from Ramallah to Jericho, she refused and lived for a month in a protest tent until the order fell. In 2015, twelve charges against her amounted to political acts: speeches, attending a book fair, and visiting a released prisoner.

In 2021, during yet another detention, her daughter Suha, a thirty-one-year-old researcher, died suddenly — and Israel denied her mother a farewell. Israeli forces arrested her for the fifth time in the early hours of December 26, 2023, the day before she was due to publicly present a study on Israel’s abuses against Palestinian prisoners during the genocide in Gaza. Thirteen months of administrative detention followed. She spent the last six in total isolation, in a cell two and a half meters by one, without a window or ventilation.

Prison authorities moved her there days after Israel’s national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, visited Damon Prison. When she asked why, a guard replied: “You will not know the reason for your isolation, nor how long it will last.” She walked out on January 19, 2025, in the first prisoner exchange of the ceasefire. The conversation below took place in English, in mid-August. Israel’s doctrine of destroying refugee camps is spreading from the northern West Bank to the gates of Jerusalem.

Israel voted in legislative elections on October 27, and Palestinians face elections in November that many do not believe in. Against this backdrop, Jarrar talks about prisons and libraries, about imperialism and oxygen — and about what a person does, locked alone in a darkened cell, in order not to go mad. Jacobin Israel first arrested you on March 8, 1989 — International Women’s Day, at the height of the first intifada. In an essay, you begin the history of the prisoners’ movement not with a battle but with a song: the women of the 1936 revolt who, outside the British Mandate’s prisons, hid messages in coded syllables of folk songs.

You also trace an unbroken legal line from British colonial emergency laws to today’s military courts — and Israel has detained around one million Palestinians since 1967, more than fifty thousand of them children. How do you explain that an emergency law older than the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is still, in 2026, putting people in cells without charge? Khalida Jarrar When we talk about the colonial system, we have to talk about the colonial system all over the world.

In the case of Palestine, there is a direct continuity with the British system: the British Mandate governed through emergency laws — house demolitions, curfews, collective punishment, administrative detention. When Israel came, it continued that system, learned from it, developed it — and today it exports it across the whole world. We are talking about a system tied to all the capitalist and imperial systems. Since 1967, around one million Palestinians have passed through Israeli prisons, including children and women.

And the prison system is the same as under the mandate. In my research, I found that it is also very similar to the Irish experience and to the US system. Is international law for the weak or an excuse for the strong? It is a colonial system that always seeks the same thing — to colonize, to settle. Within its liberal mechanism, it developed something I call “making it nice”: making violence presentable through the law, through emergency laws, through military orders.

That is why administrative detention exists: they arrest anyone on the basis of a so-called secret file, and there are people who spend seven years like that, without anyone ever accusing them of anything. This struggle against colonial emergency laws no longer belongs only to Palestinians — they have become a worldwide mechanism, and we have to fight them together. And when we turn to international humanitarian law, we find that Israel has violated it in its entirety: the right to life, the conventions on the treatment of prisoners, the right to a fair trial.

There is a big question today about this system: Is international law for the weak or an excuse for the strong? I believe we need an international law for the victims, not for the colonial system — a global system in the service of the weak and of the victims to protect, in the end, humanity. Jacobin Israel holds more than 9,600 Palestinian political prisoners today, over 3,500 of them without charge and some 350 of them children. More than one hundred have died in custody.

Israel bars the International Committee of the Red Cross from visiting, and a new law creates a special court for Palestinians, with the death penalty. You came out of six months of solitary confinement straight into freedom and said that conditions are the worst since 1967 — that Ben-Gvir, Israel’s minister of national security, “treats prisoners as if they were not human.” What has changed? Khalida Jarrar In my last imprisonment, I spent thirteen months in administrative detention, six of them in isolation.

Ben-Gvir’s policy uses the tools of punishment out loud, not under the table. And he is proud when he enters prisoners’ cells to threaten them. He is proud of the death penalty law — when the world is moving to abolish that punishment, because it is inhuman. He has reopened cells and prisons that Israel had closed for decades. In Ramle there is an underground prison, the “Rakevet,” which Israel used from 1967 until the mid-1970s and then shut down, because it was too terrible.

Ben-Gvir reopened it and put people from Gaza there. For Gaza’s prisoners, there is in fact a kind of administrative detention called the “unlawful combatants” law: six months, renewable for another six, and another six, with no one knowing until when. From my own experience, I tell you: they treat you like an animal. They attack your humanity — they want you to feel that you are not a human being. I do not want to go into details about the food, the beatings, the strip searches, the punishments.

But imagine: six months in a cell two and a half meters by one, with no windows, in summer, full of humidity. For the first three months the light was always on; then they started switching it off during the day and keeping it on all night. There was no oxygen. This punishment is revenge, because I did nothing but give some speeches about the political situation. Of course I am Palestinian, I am against the occupation, and I seek the freedom of my people, as I seek the freedom of all the peoples of the world — I believe in that connection.

And anyone who lives under the capitalist system also knows the mechanisms that crush people: running to eat, running for a house, living only to survive. What they did to me is a small example of how this system, full of violence, treats people in an inhuman way. Jacobin Those who study incarceration — in Palestine and around the world — say that solitary confinement is not an extra degree of harshness: it is a distinct instrument that works by removing the collective Palestinian prisoners spent sixty years building.

The question is not how you endured the pain — it is how you kept your political mind intact, your mental health, when they took away exactly the thing that makes it political. And one more: the late prisoner and writer Walid Daqqah wrote that the occupier had moved on from disciplining bodies to trying to dismantle consciousness itself. Is that what you felt they were trying to do to you? Khalida Jarrar Yes, of course — that is their aim.

From the first moment I entered isolation, which is an extremely hard experience, I made two decisions. The first: how to make my body survive; the second: how to keep my mind working. Because their aim is for you to go mad, or to damage your thinking. The body I saved with water — drinking water, the only thing I had. And sometimes they cut it off, as punishment: two or three days without water, without being able to shower. Sometimes they brought me a bottle; other times they “forgot” — because the essential thing is to negate you, to pretend you are not there.

When the guards passed the door of my cell, they turned their faces away; they did not look at me. The mind was the second battle. In those few meters, I walked all day long. I decided not to sleep during the day — only at night. There were no books; there was nothing inside the cell. So I held discussions inside my head. I told myself: they want to destroy you, but you are part of a people fighting for its freedom, and you are part of the strugglers of the whole world — like Bobby Sands, like Angela Davis.

You belong to those people. The essential thing is to negate you, to pretend you are not there. And I worked. At Birzeit University, I am doing a major piece of research on the class and gender analysis of women prisoners from 1967 until today — I had already written parts of it. So I would discuss the research with myself. And there is something else: what they did shows their fascism, but it does not make me a victim. I am not an individual; I believe in the collective experience.

That is why when people tell me, “we want to write your story,” I answer: no. I write about the collective experience because we are part of a collective experience worldwide. The root of the fascist capitalist system contains violence. Violence is part of its content — not freedom and democracy, which are the slogans they want to teach us. Lately I have gone back to reading Karl Marx’s Capital , the pages on the violence of the colonial systems, on how many people they killed.

That is how I governed myself inside: always believing that I am part of a whole, that I am not alone. Those were the words I used with myself: Khalida, you are not alone. Jacobin The activist Munther Amira tells this story: when Israeli authorities transferred him to a high-security prison, he found in the yard a thin, weakened man he barely recognized who called out his name. It was Marwan Barghouti. The next day, the prisoners were sitting in a circle listening to Barghouti give a lecture — because the guards had emptied the prison library, and the men had answered by teaching one another.

Barghouti pointed him to a chair: “It’s your turn. We want to hear about your nonviolent resistance.” And when they asked him what he thought of it, he replied: “Call it whatever you like, as long as you resist.” Later,

Read the original article on jacobin.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

Jacobin publishes an interview with Khalida Jarrar, opening with her record of detention by Israel, including thirteen months of administrative detention and six months in isolation, then gives her account of prison conditions under Ben-Gvir and how she endured solitary confinement. The outlet's own framing names who detained and isolated her and states the documented record plainly. Nothing in the material shows the article misleads its reader.

What it gets right

  • “Israel’s abuses against Palestinian prisoners during the genocide in Gaza”

    Jacobin calls the genocide in Gaza what it is in its own voice. It does not soften it to a war or a conflict, which matches the documented record.

  • “It allows indefinite imprisonment on the basis of a “secret file,” without charge, without trial, and without a lawyer able to contest what cannot be read”

    Jacobin explains plainly what administrative detention means for the person held. It does not leave the term as unexplained official language.

  • “Prison authorities moved her there days after Israel’s national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, visited Damon Prison”

    Jacobin names the actor and the sequence of events behind her isolation. It does not hide who was responsible behind a passive construction.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Jacobin

Everything we scored from Jacobin