Evening Standard, on UK Politics, 12 November 2026
We do not republish articles from Evening Standard. Our findings are below, each quoting the words it is about. Read the full article on the outlet's own site.
Read the original article on standard.co.uk (opens in a new tab)The Evening Standard reports the conviction of Mostafa Sepahvand and Farhad Javadi Manesh at Woolwich Crown Court for conduct likely to assist Iran's intelligence service, and the acquittal of a third defendant. It states the offence in its legal terms, attributes the prosecution's allegations to the prosecution and names the people targeted. Nothing in it misleads the reader.
“found guilty of carrying out activities likely to assist Iran's intelligence service”
The Standard states the offence in the precise legal terms of the conviction. It does not inflate it into a proven spying charge beyond what the jury decided.
“Prosecutors alleged Sepahvand intended to carry out a "violent attack"”
The Standard attributes the most serious allegation to the prosecution. It does not state it as established fact in its own voice.
“was cleared by the jury of the same offence”
The Standard reports the acquittal of the third defendant plainly and repeats it at the end, so the reader does not assume all three were convicted.
Spot something we missed? Report this article