Los Angeles Times, on UK Politics, 2 November 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

Britain says many migrants will have to wait longer to win the right to stay

No framing issues found.

Britain says many migrants will have to wait longer to win the right to stay

-

Click here to listen to this article -

- Britain plans to double the wait for many work-visa holders seeking permanent residency to 10 years, while higher earners and public-sector workers can qualify sooner.

- The rules, expected to take effect in 2027, set shorter waits for people earning above specified thresholds; care workers could still qualify after five years.

- Refugees who arrive outside government-sponsored safe routes could wait up to 20 years to settle — or 30 if they came by small boat — amid mounting political pressure over immigration.

LONDON — The British government announced Monday that it will double the time many immigrants must wait before they can settle permanently in the country, though it exempted key workers and high earners from the changes.

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said people who come to the U.K. on work visas will have to wait a decade to be granted permanent residency status, which carries the right to work, study, access free health care and claim benefits. But a higher income can speed up the process. People who earn at least $67,000 a year will only have to wait five years, as will public-sector workers including doctors, nurses and teachers. Immigrants on salaries above $167,000 a year can apply for settlement after three years.

Mahmood said the changes will be introduced during 2027 and will restore fairness to the immigration system by linking the right to settle to an immigrant’s contribution to Britain.

She told lawmakers that her own parents came to the U.K. from Pakistan half a century ago “because they knew we do things differently here, and that we value above all else fair play. It is my responsibility to ensure our migration system lives up to that ideal.”

The changes are a softening of proposals Mahmood made last year which drew opposition from some in the governing Labor Party. The original plan would have made lower-paid immigrant workers, including those who keep Britain’s care homes running, wait 15 years to settle permanently. Care workers will continue to be eligible for settlement after five years, as long as they earn at least $18,633 a year.

The median U.K. salary is about $52,000 a year.

Immigration has been a divisive political issue in Britain for decades, and was a major factor in the 2016 vote to leave the European Union, which allows freedom of movement across the nations of the bloc. The arrival of tens of thousands of asylum seekers across the English Channel in dinghies each year has kept the subject high up the political agenda.

The small-boat crossings have been depicted as a crisis by politicians including Nigel Farage of the hard-right party Reform UK, and have been used as a rallying point by anti-immigration activists.

Channel ports, housing for asylum seekers and even the lifeboat charity that rescues people in danger at sea have been targeted by anti-migrant protests encouraged by far-right activists.

Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s center-left Labor Party government says stepped-up law enforcement cooperation between Britain and France has helped reduce the number of people making the crossing so far this year by more than 40% compared with 2025.

Mahmood said that refugees “who have not come by a safe and legal route” such as a government-sponsored program will have to wait up to 20 years for permanent settlement, 30 years if they came by small boat.

Arrivals on small boats make up a fraction of total immigration, with most people entering the U.K. legally, on visas. Still, the rise of Reform UK has spurred the mainstream Labor and Conservative parties to toughen their stances on immigration.

Conservative immigration spokesman Chris Philp said Mahmood’s “U-turn” would cost $13 billion because more people will be able to receive benefits than under her initial proposal.

Liberal Democrat lawmaker Max Wilkinson said the government was “prioritizing tough rhetoric rather than a system that works.”

Critics of the changes say they are reacting to a surge in immigration that has passed. Net migration — the number of people entering the U.K. minus those who left — topped 900,000 in the year ending June 2023, driven in part by hundreds of thousands of people fleeing war in Ukraine and China’s clampdown in Hong Kong.

The number fell to 649,000 in the year to June 2024, and 204,000 in the year to June 2025, according to the Office for National Statistics. In the most recent period, the year to December 2025, the figure was 171,000.

Lawless writes for the Associated Press.

Read the original article on latimes.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

The Los Angeles Times runs an Associated Press report on the Home Secretary's plan to lengthen the wait for permanent settlement, with shorter routes for high earners, public-sector workers and care workers and up to 30 years for refugees who came by small boat. It attributes the government's claims to their sources, names the far-right activists behind the anti-migrant protests and sets the policy against official figures showing net migration has fallen sharply. Nothing in it misleads the reader.

What it gets right

  • “have been targeted by anti-migrant protests encouraged by far-right activists”

    The article names the far-right activists behind the protests rather than softening them into concerned residents, and it says plainly that the lifeboat charity and asylum housing were targeted.

  • “have been depicted as a crisis by politicians including Nigel Farage of the hard-right party Reform UK”

    The 'crisis' language is attributed to the politicians who use it, not adopted in the outlet's own voice, and Reform UK is labelled for what it is.

  • “The number fell to 649,000 in the year to June 2024, and 204,000 in the year to June 2025, according to the Office for National Statistics.”

    The article gives the full trend in net migration with its source and periods. A reader can see the policy responds to a surge that has already fallen away, rather than being handed a single peak figure.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Los Angeles Times

Everything we scored from Los Angeles Times

See how 37 outlets covered this story