The New York Times, on Climate, 12 November 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

A Concerned Californian’s Guide to El Niño

No framing issues found.

A very strong El Niño flexed its muscles in 1982-83, and relentless storms pummeled the California coast. Houses fell into the ocean, piers were smashed in two, and beaches vanished when powerful waves dragged their sand out to sea. El Niño was not a household name then, but it soon became one for Californians, whose Pacific coastline is often the first area affected when the weather pattern’s effects come ashore. In the winter of 1997-98, another strong El Niño brought unmerciful storms, leaving at least 17 people dead and causing over $550 million in damage across the state.

The winters were disastrous and lived on in popular memory. Now scientists say this winter is almost certain to deliver the strongest El Niño on record, once again drawing dire predictions for how this winter will, or could, play out across the state. But the story doesn’t always unfold as expected. The winter of 2015-16 also brought a very strong El Niño. Like this year’s, it was, to that date, one of the strongest on record. As winter — typically the time of year when El Niño’s effects on the weather are strongest — approached, it prompted anxiety among residents and intense media coverage.

The state was living through one of its worst droughts in recorded history, and many looked to the rains that El Niño typically brings for relief. But while the winter brought active surf that eroded California’s beaches, it fell short on rain as many storms that would have crossed over into California got ushered into the Pacific Northwest instead. The state ultimately recorded much less rain than forecasters had predicted. So what about this year?

Here’s how experts think the next few months could play out. Video Large Waves Pound Beachfront Houses in California Residents had to evacuate over the weekend as large waves from Rachel, a post-tropical storm, crashed into beachfront homes in Long Beach, Calif. Credit Credit... Mario Tama/Getty Images We are having trouble retrieving the article content. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings. Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. Already a subscriber? Log in . Want all of The Times? Subscribe .

Read the original article on nytimes.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

The New York Times explains El Niño to Californians through past strong winters (1982-83, 1997-98, 2015-16) and sets up expert expectations for this winter's forecast record event. The text supplied is cut off by a paywall after the introduction, and nothing in the visible text misleads the reader.

What it gets right

  • “leaving at least 17 people dead and causing over $550 million in damage across the state”

    The Times states the human cost of the 1997-98 storms plainly, with a death toll and damage figure, rather than leaving past El Niño winters as abstract weather.

  • “Now scientists say this winter is almost certain to deliver the strongest El Niño on record”

    The forecast is attributed to scientists and keeps their stated level of confidence, so the reader knows whose projection it is.

  • “The state ultimately recorded much less rain than forecasters had predicted.”

    The Times uses the 2015-16 winter to show that a strong El Niño does not guarantee the expected outcome, which keeps forecast uncertainty in view without dismissing the risk.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The New York Times

  1. 12 NovStorm Charles Pummels Portugal and Disrupts Flights0.0
  2. 12 NovMalawi Lacks Money to Fund its El Niño Plans0.0
  3. 11 Nov‘Fight Harder,’ U.N. Chief António Guterres Implores, Rousing Climate Ambassadors at COP310.0
  4. 11 NovThe United States Is Skipping COP31 in Turkey0.0
  5. 11 NovStorms Slam British Columbia and California Is Next0.0

Everything we scored from The New York Times