Daily Mail, on UK Politics, 7 November 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

of Andy Burnham 's . Whitehall sources said Treasury officials will be asked to set out the potential economic benefits of a range of options for Britain's future relations with the European Union . One insider said the move was designed to 'inform the debate' over how far to go in unpicking Brexit. But the revelation triggered warnings that Labour is planning to revive the Project Fear tactics of the referendum campaign in a bid to bounce the country back into the EU.

Former Tory leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith said the initiative 'sounds like Project Fear all over again'. He told the Daily Mail: 'There is no limit to Burnham's ambitions when he talks of getting closer to the EU. 'All the nonsense about the UK's economic performance is without evidence. We have outgrown the EU.' Shadow Chancellor Andrew Griffith also warned the Treasury against 'giving us Project Fear in reverse'. In the run-up to the 2016 vote, the Treasury produced an 'analysis' claiming that Britain would suffer a 'profound shock' if it voted to leave the EU.

Andy Burnham is pushing for a fresh debate about Britain's relationship with the European Union, arguing closer ties could boost economic growth Burnham meets with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on the sidelines of the 81st United Nations General Assembly on September 22, 2026 It said the UK would be plunged into a deep recession, with house prices falling by up to 18 per cent and unemployment jumping by up to 820,000.

A review of the predictions by investment platform AJ Bell this year found the Treasury had been right to forecast a fall in the value of the pound, but added: 'Neither of the Treasury's short-term "shock" or "severe shock" scenarios proved totally accurate.' Mr Burnham is pushing to reopen the Brexit debate, despite saying in May that it was 'the last thing we should do right now'. He will use a UK-EU summit in Brussels this month to launch a 'conversation'.

The PM claimed this week that a new food and farming deal would boost the UK's GDP by 0.4 per cent over time – equal to £12billion a year. But the Treasury has refused to publish the analysis on which the figure is based. It came as the Bank of England governor also claimed the UK would benefit from closer ties with Europe, with Mr Burnham seizing on his comments to justify striking a new deal with Brussels. Andrew Bailey said more open trade with the EU would improve growth, telling the BBC: 'Would the UK being able to trade more openly with its nearest neighbours, to have that trade, to have that market openness, be beneficial for growth in the UK?

My view is yes, it would.' In response, Mr Burnham said in a separate BBC interview on Friday night: 'The governor of the Bank of England said yesterday that getting closer to Europe again would bring growth. And that is what I'm trying to do.' But Shanker Singham, a former government trade adviser and chairman of The Growth Commission, said: 'Quite simply, this EU reset is being sold to the British people on the back of flawed assumptions and bogus calculations.'

A Treasury source said the department had not yet been asked to draw up a new analysis of potential EU options. A spokesman said the analysis of the new food and farming deal would be published 'in due course'.

Read the original article on dailymail.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Daily Mail tells readers as its own fact that the Treasury is to produce a 'Project Fear' analysis, though the body attributes the plan to unnamed Whitehall sources and near the end reports a Treasury source saying no such analysis has been asked for. The headline turns a Tory politician's jibe into the outlet's verdict, and the article calls the government's EU policy a 'betrayal' in its own voice.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Serious

    “The return of Project Fear: Treasury to outline PM's Brexit reset plan with Brussels in echo of Remain's scare tactics”

    Why this matters
    The headline states as the Mail's own fact that the Treasury will outline the plan, and labels it 'Project Fear' and 'scare tactics' with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the Treasury has been commissioned to produce a scare campaign and that this is established.
    The context
    The body attributes the plan only to 'Whitehall sources'. It says officials would set out potential benefits, not warnings. A Treasury source says the department has not been asked to draw up any new analysis. 'Project Fear' is Iain Duncan Smith's phrase, which the body attributes to him.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“had not yet been asked to draw up a new analysis of potential EU options”
    • Elsewhere in the article“sounds like Project Fear all over again”
    • Elsewhere in the article“will be asked to set out the potential economic benefits”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Treasury may be asked to assess options for closer EU ties, sources say, as Tories call it 'Project Fear all over again'.

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “The Treasury is to conduct a new 'Project Fear-style' analysis”

    Why this matters
    The opening sentence states in the Mail's own voice that the Treasury 'is to conduct' the analysis, and attaches the 'Project Fear-style' label to it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the analysis is confirmed and is designed to frighten voters.
    The context
    The only basis given is unnamed Whitehall sources. The article's own Treasury source says the department has not been asked to do this. That denial comes only in the second-to-last sentence, after a long run of critics' warnings.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Whitehall sources said Treasury officials will be asked”
    • Elsewhere in the article“A Treasury source said the department had not yet been asked”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Whitehall sources say Treasury officials may be asked to assess the economic effects of options for closer EU ties, though a Treasury source said no such analysis has yet been requested.

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “planned Brexit betrayal”

    Why this matters
    The Mail calls the government's EU policy a 'betrayal' in its own news voice, without quotation marks or attribution.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established that the policy betrays the country.
    The context
    The article's own facts describe a plan to seek closer trade ties and to launch a 'conversation' at a summit. Whether that is a betrayal is a political verdict. The same label appears in the paper's own comment column.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Mail

  1. 7 NovKemi Badenoch turns on Trump: Tory leader says President deserved 'entirely self-inflicted' mid-term thrashing3.0
  2. 7 NovIt will cost £6BILLION to get young people back into work, Alan Milburn tells Andy Burnham7.3
  3. 7 NovWhistleblower warns that Labour's conversion therapy ban would have been used to suppress scandal at NHS gender clinic for children3.0
  4. 6 NovKeir Starmer cashes in on lucrative speaking gigs after quitting No10 as he signs up with US-based agency which boasts Joe Biden, Jacinda Ardern and Kamala Harris among its clients3.0
  5. 6 NovLondon's 'tacky' pink tuk-tuk pedicabs star in John Lewis' latest Christmas ad - but could they soon be outlawed? Tough new laws crack down on rip-off fares and blaring music3.0

Everything we scored from Daily Mail