The Scotsman, on UK Politics, 27 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Chancellor warned not to axe North Sea energy project to fund defence in carbon capture 'betrayal'

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Chancellor John Healey has been warned not to hold back Aberdeen’s oil and gas sector by ensuring extra defence spending does not come at the expense of a key energy project. It is widely anticipated that Mr Healey, who will deliver his first Budget on Wednesday, will signal a ramping up of spending on defence. Mr Healey quit Sir Keir Starmer’s government as defence secretary in protest at a lack of funding being pledged on Britain’s military.

Energy projects earmarked by former net zero secretary Ed Miliband are expected to be in the firing line to make way for the additional defence spending. Mr Miliband used a visit to Aberdeenshire last year to pledge £200 million for the Acorn carbon capture and storage project. A final investment decision is expected to be made in the UK government’s spending review next year - but cuts to the energy security and net zero budget in the Budget would lay the path for funding for the project to be scrapped.

UK ministers committed £9.4 billion at last year’s spending review to support the carbon capture industry up to 2030, with £21.7 billion pledged over the next 25 years. But speculation has mounted that carbon capture projects could be in line for the axe. David Whitehouse, chief executive of industry body Offshore Energies UK (OEUK), told The Scotsman investment in carbon capture should be coming forward from Westminster. “It is the key time for our carbon storage future,” he said.

“I think the opportunities for Scotland are significant. “Acorn is important, but it's not just Acorn. We see across the North Sea huge opportunities to store carbon dioxide, not just from the UK and Scotland but also from Europe. “I’ve been delighted to see the progress that we're now seeing on the first two track 1 projects. But I do think it is going to be a critical decision at the spending review next year, seeing support coming through for Acorn and the projects that sit beyond that.

“That will be an important message for the industrial sector in Scotland but also for our future in carbon storage.I think critical decisions will lie ahead of us next year.” SNP MP Seamus Logan said: "The Westminster government has dithered and delayed on North East carbon capture for too long and quite frankly this is a complete betrayal of the sector. "Energy security is national security so let's not pretend this is about defence spending - this is about Westminster hammering Scottish industry to patch holes in the Treasury finances just as they always have done.”

Scottish Conservative energy spokesperson, Liam Kerr, said: “Both of Scotland’s governments have repeatedly short-changed the North East when it comes to investing in carbon capture and storage. “Now there are real fears that the UK Labour government is preparing to follow the SNP’s lead and fail to fully support this technology in the Budget. “The people of the North East will be eagerly awaiting to see if Labour’s Budget decides investing in these facilities is no longer a political priority for them and if they will ignore the calls from the industry.”

UK reindustrialisation minister Blair McDougall said: “Both hydrogen and carbon capture undersea storage are an essential part, not just of the reindustrialisation story, but of the net zero story as well. “Decisions on all of these projects will be a matter for the Budget, but we are absolutely committed to the role that hydrogen can play in the UK economy.”

Read the original article on scotsman.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Scotsman reports industry and opposition pressure on Chancellor John Healey to keep funding the Acorn carbon capture project ahead of his Budget, and includes the UK government's reply. The outlet calls the project crucial for Scotland's clean energy ambitions in its own voice, without saying who holds that view.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “The project is crucial for Scotland’s clean energy ambitions.”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls the project "crucial" in its own voice, without saying who holds that view.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as settled that Acorn is crucial, rather than as the view of the industry body and the politicians lobbying for it.
    The context
    The article gives no source for this judgement. The people quoted who press the case are an industry lobby and opposition parties. Even the industry chief says "Acorn is important, but it's not just Acorn".

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Acorn is important, but it's not just Acorn”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “UK reindustrialisation minister Blair McDougall said”

    It gives the UK government a direct reply, so the article does not rest only on its critics.

  • “£9.4 billion at last year’s spending review to support the carbon capture industry up to 2030, with £21.7 billion pledged over the next 25 years”

    It gives each funding figure with its period, so a reader can judge the scale of what is at stake.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Scotsman

  1. 27 OctTaxing banks will hit growth, Scottish finance chief Sandy Begbie warns Chancellor0.0
  2. 27 OctReaders' Letters: Greens climbing the Magic Money Tree with rail promise0.0
  3. 27 OctFreedom of movement confusion shows Andy Burnham's Government lacks clarity0.0
  4. 27 OctWhy a do little budget puts our country in peril - Brian Monteith3.0
  5. 27 OctScotland needs community coppers back - and SNP must come up with the cash0.0

Everything we scored from The Scotsman