The Jerusalem Post, on Iran, 12 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Iran can still produce 50 ballistic missiles a month, despite US-Israeli strikes - report

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findingsSee them marked on jpost.com

An intelligence estimate has determined that Iran has the capacity to build approximately 50 ballistic missiles per month despite damage to its industrial capacity in the recent war, according to a Wednesday Bloomberg report.At roughly half of its pre-war capacity, months of airstrikes by the US-Israeli coalition in operations Roaring Lion and Epic Fury, as well as economic sanctions and a blockade, .Despite major damage to its military infrastructure, the Islamic Republic of Iran "likely has at least 1,700 ballistic missiles remaining," and is building more every day, according to a Western official citing military intelligence reports."There could also be thousands of Shahed-type strike weapons remaining in its arsenal," Jim Lamson, a research fellow at the Department of War Studies at King's College London and former CIA analyst for the Middle East, told Bloomberg.Shahed-based weapons systems are unmanned drones that include "suicide" variants that blur the line between traditional drones and cruise missiles.IRGC unveils underground 'missile city,' ambitions for striking USIran recently unveiled what it claimed was a new "missile city," with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) showing off the underground site, which included ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and their launchers in its stockpile.Fatah-1 medium-range ballistic missiles appeared to fill the underground missile city."Advanced missiles will surprise enemies with their battlefield impact," said the Chief of Staff of Iran's Armed Forces, Maj.-Gen. Ali Abdollahi.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The outlet quotes Jim Lamson on thousands of Shaheds but leaves out his caution that Iran's remaining arsenal is extremely hard to size and that public estimates are 'all over the map'. It also omits that Iran's prewar stockpile and its rate of reconstitution are unknown. Without this, a reader takes the 50 a month and 1,700 missile figures, and the outlet's 'more than capable' verdict, as firm rather than highly uncertain estimates.

How we know

"If the enemy makes another move against us, our response will extend beyond the region."

The unveiling illustrates Iran's efforts to show that it has preserved its missile capabilities despite American and Israeli airstrikes.Yesterday, after Israel's Rafael Advanced Defense Systems unveiled its new "Super Ice" cruise missile, the IRGC responded by presenting its Fatah-2 hypersonic missile.

The missile, which reaches up to 18,500 kilometers per hour in parts of its flight, is feared by some analysts to be capable of reaching the mainland United States should Iran's ambitions be realized by .Iran has formally abandoned its self-imposed 2,000-kilometer missile range limit, and has actively begun threatening to strike US bases in Europe should attacks be launched from them, according to the Institute for the Study of War.Netanyahu, Trump backtrack on Iran war successes, plan further strikesIn March, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed that “after 20 days, I can tell you, Iran today has no ability to enrich uranium, and no ability to produce ballistic missiles.”US President Donald Trump has made similar statements following the execution of the war.Trump stated on November 9 that nearly 85% of Iran's manufacturing capability has been destroyed, while warning that US forces remain "locked and loaded and ready to go" if necessary..Last week, former US Central Command (CENTCOM) deputy commander Rear-Adm. (ret.)

Robert Stiles Howard said the failure of the United States and Israel to destroy Iran's ballistic missile and drone capabilities is "probably the most significant failure" of the war.Seth J. Frantzman, Yonah Jeremy Bob, and Aaron Glick contributed to this report.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

The Jerusalem Post reports a Western intelligence estimate on Iran's missile output, but in its own voice it calls Iran's nuclear programme a weapons programme and says two leaders are preparing strikes because of it. It turns an estimate of retaliatory capacity into its own verdict that 'the Iranian regime' is 'more than capable of resuming hostilities'. It also drops the caution, reported elsewhere and by the analyst it quotes, that these figures are very uncertain.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “Both leaders have made preparations to resume strikes on Iran because of the reported advancement of its nuclear weapons program”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the outlet calls Iran's nuclear programme 'its nuclear weapons program'. It hedges only the 'advancement' with 'reported'. It then states as fact that both leaders are preparing strikes for that reason.
    The impression it gives
    That Iran has a nuclear weapons programme as an established fact, and that Netanyahu and Trump are actively preparing new strikes because of it.
    The context
    No source is given for a weapons programme. The article's only nuclear claim is Netanyahu's about enrichment. Other reports of the same week say Trump saw no need for more strikes and called the war effectively over, so the claim about preparations and their motive is the outlet's assertion.

    Show it in the article

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “the Iranian regime is still more than capable of resuming hostilities in force”

    Why this matters
    The outlet turns an intelligence estimate of production capacity into its own unattributed verdict that Iran is 'more than capable' of 'resuming hostilities in force'.
    The impression it gives
    That Iran's ability to start a new round of fighting is an established fact, and that Iran is the side that would resume it.
    The context
    Other reports of the same estimate describe it as a capacity to retaliate if hostilities resume. They do not describe it as an Iranian ability or readiness to resume the war, and they attribute it to the intelligence assessment.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “overlapping its multi-stage space launch technology used to put satellites into orbit with its ICBM infrastructure”

    Why this matters
    The outlet attributes the fear to 'some analysts', but it states in its own voice that Iran has 'ICBM infrastructure'.
    The impression it gives
    That Iran possesses intercontinental ballistic missile infrastructure as a known fact.
    The context
    No source in the article establishes that Iran has ICBM infrastructure. The phrase sits in the outlet's narration without attribution.

    Show it in the article

  4. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “the Iranian regime”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls Iran's government 'the Iranian regime' in its own narration, with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    That the outlet's own description of Iran's government carries a built-in verdict of illegitimacy.
    The context
    The word is a judgement, not a description. 'Iran's government' states the same fact without it.

    Show it in the article

  5. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The outlet quotes Jim Lamson on thousands of Shaheds but leaves out his caution that Iran's remaining arsenal is extremely hard to size and that public estimates are 'all over the map'. It also omits that Iran's prewar stockpile and its rate of reconstitution are unknown. Without this, a reader takes the 50 a month and 1,700 missile figures, and the outlet's 'more than capable' verdict, as firm rather than highly uncertain estimates.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 11 NovIran attacks shipping navigation systems on Oman's Didamar island near Strait of Hormuz3.0
  2. 11 NovIran declares Argentina's navy, air force as 'terrorist groups' in reciprocal move over IRGC ban0.0
  3. 11 NovUN elects Iran to key committee overseeing organization's global priorities despite criticism0.0
  4. 11 NovTrump vows 'total victory' over Iran, claims Tehran will need 25 years to recover from US strikes3.0
  5. 11 NovRezaei: 'Not a single particle' of enriched material will leave Iran, IRGC will retaliate vs US0.0

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post