The Jewish Chronicle, on UK Politics, 27 October 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

Counter terror chief defends decision to bail RAF Fairford ‘plot’ suspects

No framing issues found.

The head of national counter terrorism policing has defended the decision to bail five people over the suspected terror plot near RAF Fairford. While the move may have appeared “illogical” to the public, it ultimately led to two British nationals being charged with national security offences, Assistant Commissioner Laurence Taylor said. The decision to bail the five suspects on September 28 was widely questioned, including by US President Donald Trump, who said: “I’m surprised that they released them.

I wouldn’t have done that.” Three suspicious vans carrying petrol were found near the US-used base on September 27 and Counter Terrorism Policing (CTP) believes Iran’s intelligence services are behind the plot. In an update on Tuesday, Mr Taylor told reporters outside Scotland Yard: “For the public, this incident was defined by images of three vans being stopped and searched by armed police officers, and the arrest of five men at scene.

“The subsequent release of those five men on police bail sparked significant questions and speculation about the investigation, and why that was the case. “We know that decisions made during our investigations can sometimes appear illogical to those on the outside, but I want to make it very clear that there will always be a good reason or rationale behind them.” He added: “In this case, this decision-making has led to swifter progress, better evidence and ultimately us securing the charges.

“In sensitive investigations like this, it can take time to convert intelligence into evidence.” The senior officer said those involved in suspected plots like the one at RAF Fairford might not be aware of the wider plan. It is understood that one of the suspects called police from the scene. Mr Taylor said: “Our investigations involving proxies take time to establish what those individuals knew about the ambition behind the tasking. “Sometimes individuals can have no knowledge at all, or even partial knowledge of what they’re being asked to do on behalf of common states.

Sometimes they have full knowledge. Not a theoretical threat.” Mohmed Abdulkarim, 24, of London, will appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court later on Tuesday charged with assisting a foreign intelligence service under the National Security Act 2023. He will appear alongside Nouman Essghir, 24, also of London, who is charged with entering a prohibited place for a purpose prejudicial to the UK at RAF Fairford on August 22, weeks before he was arrested at the scene near the Gloucestershire base alongside four other men on September 27.

A 25-year-old dual UK/Iranian national, who was also arrested on October 20 on suspicion of aiding Iran’s intelligence service, has been released without charge but remains on police bail after being arrested on October 1 on suspicion of preparation of terrorist acts. Five other men arrested during the investigation remain on police bail.

Read the original article on thejc.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

The Jewish Chronicle reports the counter terrorism chief's defence of bailing the RAF Fairford suspects and the charges brought against two men. It attributes the claim of Iranian involvement to police, presents the charges as charges rather than proven guilt, and includes the point that some of those arrested may not have known the wider plan. Nothing in it misleads the reader.

What it gets right

  • “Counter Terrorism Policing (CTP) believes Iran’s intelligence services are behind the plot”

    The article attributes the claim that Iran is behind the plot to the police rather than stating it in its own voice. This keeps an unproven allegation clearly marked as one.

  • “It is understood that one of the suspects called police from the scene.”

    The article includes a fact that cuts against a simple reading of all five men as knowing plotters. It sits alongside the officer's point that proxies may have had no knowledge of the plan.

  • “will appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court later on Tuesday charged with assisting a foreign intelligence service under the National Security Act 2023”

    The article names the specific offence and the court date and describes the men as charged, not guilty. This gives the reader the exact legal position without overstating it.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jewish Chronicle

  1. 27 OctCamden Council investigating statue of convicted terrorist erected in Bloomsbury6.0
  2. 27 OctRAF Fairford ‘plot co-ordinated by handler working on behalf of Iran’0.0
  3. 27 OctMPs urge Birmingham’s Lib Dem council leader to end power-sharing deal with Greens over ‘Zionism is racism’ policy6.0
  4. 27 OctTwo UK nationals charged over RAF Fairford ‘plot to aid Iran’3.0
  5. 27 OctHow did eco-idealists of the 70s descend into Israel-hating Greens of today?3.0

Everything we scored from The Jewish Chronicle