Daily Mail, on UK Politics, 4 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Kemi Badenoch attacks Labour's 'student union government' as Tory leader brands conversion therapy ban 'unworkable' and a 'waste of time'

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Kemi Badenoch has branded Labour 's attempt to ban conversion therapy 'unworkable' and a 'waste of time' while questions have been raised over why supportive MPs have been chosen to scrutinise it. The Tory leader warned that the legislation – intended to protect gay and transgender people from attempts to change their sexuality or gender identity – would lead to parents being arrested for looking after their children. She said she had looked at the bill when she was Equalities Minister in the last Conservative government and said it was unnecessary, since laws are already in place to prevent abuse or discrimination against vulnerable people.

Her comments came after a major report co-written by Britain's former equalities watchdog Baroness Falkner said the new law could lead to children being prosecuted as well as parents , and would even make it illegal to tell someone who identifies as a cat that they are human. The Policy Exchange study said that parents could be jailed for up to five years if they try to dissuade their children from transitioning, refuse to pay for their gender surgery or even fail to call them by their preferred names and pronouns.

, so that commonplace family interactions could be deemed ‘psychological or emotional pressure’. Speaking on board HMS Wellington for a defence rally on Tuesday, Mrs Badenoch said: 'This Labour Government is a student union Government. All of the silly ideas which they've wasted time on is what they're bringing in. They don't know how to make anyone's lives better.

This is something that's going to mean that parents start getting arrested for parenting their children.' She added: 'I looked at this bill when we were in government. It is unworkable. We want to make sure that we protect people who are vulnerable and make sure that people are not discriminated on the basis of their sexuality. The laws are already in place. The laws are already in place. 'The reason why it's a waste of time is in yet another pretend bit of legislation that's going to confuse and complicate and mean that we lose common sense, people are afraid to speak to their children and tell the truth, and that's why we don't support what Labour is doing.'

Downing Street insisted the draft legislation 'doesn't touch regular parenting', and would not 'prevent open, exploratory or challenging conversations between young people, or with parents, teachers, clinicians, or pastoral leaders'. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch at a defence rally on board HMS Wellington in London But the Prime Minister's spokesman refused to rule out some parents being caught by the clampdown, telling reporters: 'LGBT+ people should never, without exception, have to suffer coercion or abuse in an effort to change who they are. 'Successive governments have agreed for almost a decade that conversion practices have no place in modern Britain.

This Government is finally delivering on that promise.' Meanwhile questions have been raised about the make-up of the joint committee set up to 'consider and report on' the Government's draft Conversion Practices Bill. Its chairman is Labour MP Alex Barros-Curtis, who told the minister behind the bill that she 'should be really proud of what she has achieved'. He added: 'We should get this law on to the statute book as quickly as possible.'

Before becoming an MP in 2024 he served as Labour's Executive Director of Legal Affairs and was accused of overseeing investigations into . Another member of the committee is Olivia Bailey, who drafted the bill as a junior Equalities Minister in Sir Keir Starmer's government and who now chairs the Women and Equalities Committee. A third Labour MP on the committee, Danny Beales, thanked her in the Commons for 'her hard, relentless and committed work in delivering this comprehensive and inclusive draft Bill'.

Former Labour MP Rosie Duffield, who said Mr Barros-Curtis spent more than a year investigating her over a single 'like' of a social media post , told the Daily Mail: 'I find it amazing that a former senior Labour Party barrister, whose role it was to oversee and decide on the investigations of Labour members, mostly women with legally protected gender critical beliefs, should be chairing this committee which is about the same set of contested beliefs that this Bill is about. 'The new Chair of the Women and Equalities Committee is the former minister who drafted the Bill, and by also serving as a member on it, she is essentially marking her own homework.'

A spokesman for the bill committee said: 'In line with standard practice for joint pre-legislative committees, the Members are appointed by both Houses to conduct detailed scrutiny of the Draft Bill in question. 'The Committee includes Members with a range of views who will collectively scrutinise the Draft Conversion Practices Bill in a balanced way, and propose amendments where appropriate to ensure that any legislation which subsequently comes before Parliament is in the best state possible.'

Read the original article on dailymail.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Daily Mail reports Kemi Badenoch's attack on Labour's draft conversion practices bill and questions over the committee scrutinising it. It says a Policy Exchange study 'pointed out' flaws in the bill, which presents a reading Downing Street disputes as established fact. In its own voice it uses the loaded term 'gender ideology'.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “It pointed out that there is neither a threshold for abusiveness in the bill nor a defence of reasonableness”

    Why this matters
    The Daily Mail uses 'pointed out' for the Policy Exchange study's reading of the bill, a verb that presents the claim as an established fact rather than one side's interpretation.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as settled that the bill has no safeguards and that ordinary family conversations could be criminalised.
    The context
    The government disputes this reading. The article itself reports Downing Street saying the bill would not prevent open, exploratory or challenging conversations, so the study's claim is contested, not a fact pointed out.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“would not 'prevent open, exploratory or challenging conversations between young people, or with parents”

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “party members who opposed gender ideology”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Daily Mail describes the subject of the investigations as 'gender ideology', a pejorative campaign term for trans people's recognition of their gender.
    The impression it gives
    A reader absorbs the critics' framing that trans identity is an ideology imposed on others.
    The context
    Elsewhere the article describes the same beliefs more neutrally, quoting Rosie Duffield on 'gender critical beliefs' and describing the bill as protecting transgender people. The term is the outlet's choice, not a neutral description.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“mostly women with legally protected gender critical beliefs”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Mail

  1. 4 NovQUENTIN LETTS: From the slavery row to the EU, our Mr Bean of a Foreign Secretary is a national liability0.0
  2. 4 NovDAILY MAIL COMMENT: It's Brexit betrayal humiliation for Andy Burnham... as he tugs his forelock to Brussels AGAIN0.0
  3. 3 NovMahmood's '£10billion migrant climbdown': Home Secretary abandons tougher residency rules after backbench revolt6.0
  4. 3 NovReform council chief who wanted women fired first quits3.0
  5. 3 NovTravellers who flattened woodland and paved over it win right to stay on site forever as council say they are powerless to intervene7.3

Everything we scored from Daily Mail