The New York Times, on Climate, 31 October 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

‘Poop Water’ Churns a Local Election in Parched Arizona

No framing issues found.

A ritzy Arizona enclave is facing water cuts, and the most divisive idea to offset them begins with millions of gallons of sewage. Call it affluent effluent. The plan — which involves rigorously treating and purifying wastewater, then routing it straight to residential taps — has long been seen as critical for the future of Scottsdale, a city heavily reliant on the dwindling flow of the Colorado River. But in recent months, Scottsdale’s wastewater recycling program has been sucked into a bitter political dispute, and its fate could hinge on the outcome of the city’s elections on Tuesday.

The Scottsdale City Council, where two seats are up for grabs, is nominally nonpartisan, but this year’s race may change the balance of power on water issues. Two candidates, both running on a right-wing platform, deride wastewater recycling as an unproven experiment. They call it “toilet to tap” or “poop water.” A third challenger, who is backed by Democratic groups, argues that the science behind wastewater recycling is robust, citing expert support for a technology considered safe and reliable.

His opponents, he says, are capitalizing on residents’ fears of contamination and downplaying the seriousness of Scottsdale’s looming water crisis. “They’re using buzzwords and scare tactics,” Raoul Zubia, a retired banker, said of his conservative opponents, Michelle Ugenti-Rita, a former state senator, and Barry Graham, an incumbent council member. We are having trouble retrieving the article content. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. Already a subscriber? Log in . Want all of The Times? Subscribe .

Read the original article on nytimes.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

The New York Times reports that a plan to recycle treated wastewater into Scottsdale's drinking supply has become a dividing line in the city council election, with two right-wing candidates attacking it and a Democrat-backed challenger defending it. The visible text attributes each side's words to named people and does not mislead its reader. Only the opening of the article was retrievable; the rest is a paywall notice.

What it gets right

  • “They call it “toilet to tap” or “poop water.””

    The Times puts the dismissive labels in the candidates' mouths and in quotation marks, so the headline's 'Poop Water' rests on words someone in the article actually said.

  • “citing expert support for a technology considered safe and reliable”

    The article tells the reader that experts back the technology, rather than staging the 'unproven experiment' line as an equal counterweight.

  • “Michelle Ugenti-Rita, a former state senator, and Barry Graham, an incumbent council member”

    It names the candidates behind the attack and says who they are, so the reader knows whose claims are being reported.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The New York Times

  1. 31 OctSouthwest Faces More Storms After Months of Heavy Rain0.0
  2. 30 OctNew York Bought an Electric Ferry. The City Can’t Charge It.0.0
  3. 29 OctNew Batteries That Store Blistering Heat Are Taking Off0.0
  4. 28 OctEverything You Could Possibly Want to Know About El Niño0.0
  5. 28 OctEverything You Could Possibly Want to Know About El Niño0.0

Everything we scored from The New York Times