The Spectator opinion piece, by Andrew Gilligan, on UK Politics, 30 September 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Cambridge students are being forced to do ‘inclusivity training’

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Students in at least one college of Cambridge University will be forced to take mandatory ‘inclusivity training’ from the start of the new term next week, The Spectator has learned. The 90-minute sessions are being delivered by Stop Hate UK. This group has published a video demanding that university students must always display ‘positive attitudes’ and ‘use respectful and kind language that will not cause harm or offence.’ Its training syllabus for ‘educational settings’ tells students that their right to free speech should be ‘restricted by other duties, responsibilities, and legislative and contractual obligations’ and teaches them how ‘opinions, attitudes and prejudice are influenced and shaped by unconscious bias, media bias, fake news, etc.’

How will students be required to ‘demonstrate’ that their behaviour is ‘inclusive?’ The hostility to free speech and the strictures about kindness and offence, in an institution supposedly about free intellectual enquiry, are ominous enough. It is a further sign of Cambridge’s intellectual decline that, if this syllabus is followed, among the first things its students will be taught is a concept, ‘unconscious bias,’ which has neither scientific validity nor empirical evidence of its effectiveness.

As a UK government report found, ‘evidence that [unconscious bias] training content and techniques “works” is lacking’ and such interventions ‘do not seem to be effective at improving diversity outcomes within workplaces.’ Most of the evidence used to justify it ‘did not use valid measures of behaviour change’ and there was even ‘potential for back-firing effects.’ Stop Hate UK has also claimed that ‘Islamophobia is a crime,’ which is untrue.

It will be interesting to know if the organisation will be able to peddle this direct lie to Cambridge students. Most popular Tim Shipman 14 things we learned from Andy Burnham’s speech Harry Mount Beware the private school con Ross Clark Burnham will regret dredging up the Brexit debate According to an email about the course sent out by the education and tutorial office at Caius College, Cambridge, and seen by The Spectator , ‘attendance by undergraduate students is mandatory.

It is important for the community as a whole to ensure a collective and unified response.’ The course will cover, among other things, ‘demonstrating inclusive behaviours’ and ‘recognition of a hate incident and its impact.’ Again, both of these are worrying and potentially coercive. How will students be required to ‘demonstrate’ that their behaviour is ‘inclusive?’ And the use of the word ‘hate incident’ rather than ‘hate crime’ suggests that behaviour falling far below the legal standard will be sanctioned.

Stop Hate UK helpfully says that hate incidents can include, for instance, ‘abusive gestures’ or ‘malicious complaints about parking.’ Its glossary speaks of ‘microaggressions’ and ‘micro-inequities’ including ‘unintentional comments’ and ‘unconscious messages’ that ‘devalue and discourage people… conveyed through facial expressions, gestures, tone of voice, choice of words.’ Among the other things defined as hateful by Stop Hate UK is truthful media reporting about .

As it puts it , ‘this leads to the formation of Anti-Muslim attitudes, subconscious biases and hate.’ Its work on this subject cites the Centre for Media Monitoring, then part of the Muslim Council of Britain, long boycotted by the British government for its views. We have covered CfMM’s deeply problematic output here. Every week it now feels like we have to ask: what on earth is happening at Cambridge University? Where does this slide end?

A spokesman for Caius College said: ‘In consultation with student representatives, the College has committed to hosting facilitated discussions around inclusivity to support the whole community at Caius.’

Read the original article on spectator.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Spectator writes of "Muslim grooming scandals" in its own voice. It attaches a religious community to crimes committed by individual men.

The model scored this article automatically, as part of a NewsCord staff review of this reporter's recent articles. Staff did not tell it where to look.

Opinion piece: read for false claims of fact and for fairness to the people it names, not for its opinions.

  1. Vilifies a community

    Serious

    “Muslim grooming scandals”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice The Spectator names the grooming crimes by the religion of a community.
    The impression it gives
    Readers come away seeing grooming as a Muslim crime, with a whole faith attached to the offences of individual men.
    The context
    The offenders are individuals convicted of crimes. Nothing in the article supports tying the crimes to Muslims as a community. Attaching that religious label to the crimes is the very effect the quoted charity warns about.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the formation of Anti-Muslim attitudes”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Among the material Stop Hate UK criticises is some media reporting on grooming gang cases.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Spectator

  1. 9 OctThe British Muslim Trust’s mosque attack claims don’t add up6.0
  2. 6 OctIs it really true that a mosque is attacked every five days in Britain?3.0
  3. 29 SeptTaking in more Palestinian refugees is a terrible idea9.1
  4. 24 SeptFarah Ahmed and the useful idiots of Cambridge University3.0
  5. 19 SeptThe Church of England is destroying itself0.0

Everything we scored from The Spectator