Truthout, on UK Politics, 30 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

UK Bars Entry to Swedish Climate Scholar Who Advocates for Palestinian Rights

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

Did you know that Truthout is a nonprofit and independently funded by readers like you? If you value what we do, please support our work with a donation . The United Kingdom’s Labour government has barred Swedish climate scholar and Palestinian rights advocate Andreas Malm from entering the country, , just days before he was scheduled to speak at a conference that will also feature a co-founder of Palestine Action — an organization banned by the UK government .

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article does not say that Palestine Action was proscribed under terrorism law, which makes expressing support for it a criminal offence. Nor does it say that the Supreme Court hears an appeal against the proscription next week. Without this, a reader cannot see the legal setting in which the Home Office acted against Malm, or that the ban is itself being challenged in court.

How we know

Malm, an author and associate professor of human ecology at Sweden’s Lund University, said Friday that he was “dismayed” by the UK Home Office’s decision this week to cancel his Electronic Travel Authorization, noting that he has “been going to the UK for decades — this is where I did my archival research for my PhD dissertation and lectured at dozens of universities and participated in even more conferences.” Malm said the UK government’s move was “nothing short of scandalous,” and he linked the decision to his scheduled appearance at the conference organized by the socialist magazine Tribune .

The event was billed as a discussion of “domination and resistance in the age of [US President Donald] Trump,” featuring Malm and Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori. “This is a drift toward authoritarianism that didn’t begin with me, and it’s not going to end with me either,” Malm told Al Jazeera . “If I’m now being deemed a threat to the public good because I’m supposed to have a conversation with someone from Palestine Action, this is guilt by association.”

Verso Books, Malm’s publisher — including of his 2025 book The Destruction of Palestine Is the Destruction of the Earth — said in a statement Friday that it is “shocked and disturbed by the Labour government’s decision to ban one of our leading authors.” Related Story News | Human Rights UK Convicts Palestine Action Activists in Crackdown on Palestine Solidarity A Palestine Action activist said they disarmed Elbit’s drones “because they were going to kill children.”

By Shireen Akram-Boshar , T ruthout May 6, 2026 Truthout “Never in over 55 years of publishing has a British government revoked the right of one of our authors to enter the country,” said Tariq Ali, the chair of Verso’s board of directors. “We can only assume, since no reasons have been given for banning him, that Andreas’ positions on Palestine, no different from the [International Criminal Court] and UN commissions, is the cause.” “Verso Books condemns the silencing of critical voices and stands in support of writers and scholars who continue to speak out about important issues and contribute to open intellectual discourse,” Ali added.

“We urge the government to restore Andreas Malm’s electronic travel authorisation immediately and allow him entry into the country.” Jeremy Corbyn, the former UK Labour leader who now serves as the Your Party MP for Islington North, joined the chorus denouncing the cancellation of Malm’s travel authorization. “This is an absurd and outrageous decision,” Corbyn wrote on social media. “What kind of society are we living in where world-renowned authors and campaigners are treated as enemies and threats?

The real threat is this government’s assault on freedom of expression.” “This is not an isolated incident — and the government should know that it is gaining a bad reputation for censorship and repression,” added Corbyn. “We know why the government has taken this decision: because it wants to silence criticism of Israel, as well as its own complicity in genocide. It will not succeed.” Press freedom is under attack As Trump cracks down on political speech, independent media is increasingly necessary.

Truthout produces reporting you won’t see in the mainstream: journalism from the frontlines of global conflict, interviews with grassroots movement leaders, high-quality legal analysis and more. Our work is possible thanks to reader support. Help Truthout catalyze change and social justice — make a tax-deductible monthly or one-time donation today. Share Share via Facebook Facebook Circle Icon Share via Bluesky Bluesky Circle Icon Share via Flipboard Flipboard Circle Icon Share via Mail Mail Circle Icon Share via Print More Share via Threads Share via Reddit Reddit Cirlce Icon Share via Pocket Pocket Circle Icon Share via Linkedin LinkedIn Circle Icon Share via Twitter Twitter Circle Icon This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license.

It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source. Jake Johnson Jake Johnson is a staff writer for Common Dreams . Follow him on Twitter: @johnsonjakep . Truthout

Read the original article on truthout.org (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

Truthout, reprinting Common Dreams, reports the Home Office's cancellation of Andreas Malm's travel authorisation mainly through his own words and those of his supporters. In its own voice it says the ban came "without explanation", although Malm's own quoted words and other coverage show officials gave a public good ground. It also calls the Palestine Action ban "highly dubious" without telling readers that the group was proscribed under terrorism law and that the ban faces a Supreme Court appeal.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “without explanation”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the article says the Labour government barred Malm "without explanation". This adopts the Verso line that no reasons were given as established fact.
    The impression it gives
    The Home Office gave Malm no ground at all for cancelling his travel authorisation.
    The context
    Officials cited a ground. Anadolu, citing The Guardian, reports that immigration officials said his presence was not conducive to the public good. Malm's own words later in this article refer to that same ground. The ground is a vague legal formula, and the article could fairly have said so, but it was not silence.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “on highly dubious grounds”

    Why this matters
    In the article's own news voice, the words "highly dubious grounds" pass a verdict on the Palestine Action ban. The article never says what those grounds were.
    The impression it gives
    The ban is plainly baseless, and it is a minor administrative matter.
    The context
    The article never says that Palestine Action was proscribed as a terrorist organisation, nor that the proscription is due before the Supreme Court next week. Other outlets reported both. The reader gets a verdict without the facts needed to weigh it.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article does not say that Palestine Action was proscribed under terrorism law, which makes expressing support for it a criminal offence. Nor does it say that the Supreme Court hears an appeal against the proscription next week. Without this, a reader cannot see the legal setting in which the Home Office acted against Malm, or that the ban is itself being challenged in court.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Truthout

Everything we scored from Truthout