ITV News, on Iran, 27 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

RAF Fairford ‘plot co-ordinated by handler working on behalf of Iran’

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

A group of men were ordered to drive vans loaded with petrol to RAF Fairford by a handler known as ‘Ali’ who police believe was working on behalf of Iran, a court heard. One of the five men tasked with driving to the base called police in the early hours of September 27 after the organiser warned the group of a bomb in the vans, prosecutors told Westminster Magistrates’ Court. Mohmed Abdulkarim, 24, and Nouman Essghir, 24, both appeared in court on Tuesday charged under the National Security Act 2023.

Abdulkarim, of London, is accused of assisting a foreign intelligence service, by acting as an “intermediary” for the handler Ali. Police attended, located three white vans and five men, who were arrested Credit: PA While Essghir, also of London, has been charged with entering a prohibited place for a purpose prejudicial to the UK, relating to an alleged “reconnaissance” mission on August 22, around a month before the Fairford incident.

Both men appeared in court and spoke to confirm their names, addresses and dates of birth. After loading the vans and travelling to RAF Fairford, the men were allegedly told to park the vans and walk away by the organiser over the phone. Prosecuting, Louise Gray, said: “Shortly thereafter the message was received that there was a bomb in the vehicles and one of them called the police.” Police attended, located three white vans and five men, who were arrested.

No explosives, or improvised explosives were found in the vans, the court heard. Police did find a metal oil drum in each, two of which had petrol in, along with hard plastic water butts and internet-enabled dashcams. Abdulkarim is alleged to have aided the organiser, Ali, who is believed to be abroad and to be acting in the interests of the Iranian state. RAF Fairford is used by the United States Air Force Credit: PA Ali is also potentially connected to an incident at the Israeli embassy earlier this year, where propaganda videos were posted online suggesting it had been attacked with a chemical weapon by a drone, the court heard.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says that Iran has firmly rejected the accusations. A reader is left believing that the claim of Iranian state direction stands unanswered.

How we know

Prosecutors allege that Abdulkarim aided Ali, buying equipment for the mission and receiving multiple payments from him totalling around £70,000. Essghir, who was also alleged to have known Ali, was among those arrested near the Fairford base on September 27, before he was re-arrested on October 20. But the charge Essghir faces relates to alleged filming of the perimeter of RAF Fairford on August 22 at the request Ali, the court heard.

RAF Fairford is used by the United States Air Force (USAF) and heavy bombers arrived there in March . A 25-year-old dual UK/Iranian national, who was also re-arrested on October 20 on suspicion of aiding Iran’s intelligence service, has been released without charge but remains on police bail after being arrested on October 1 on suspicion of preparation of terrorist acts.

Five other men arrested during the investigation remain on police bail. Abdulkarim, who was in a wheelchair in court, has been granted bail with conditions including residence and the surrender of his passport. Essghir has been remanded in custody, and both men will next appear at the Old Bailey on November 20.

Read the original article on itv.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

ITV News gives a careful court report that attributes almost every claim to prosecutors, police or the court. It describes the US bombers at RAF Fairford only through the unattributed quoted phrase "defensive operations" in Iran, when CNN's report of the same charges says they were used to strike Iran. It never tells the reader that Iran has rejected the accusations.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “following permission being granted in March for “defensive operations” in Iran”

    Why this matters
    The words "defensive operations" in Iran are the article's only description of what the US bombers at Fairford were there to do. The quotation marks name no speaker, so the phrase reads as the established purpose.
    The impression it gives
    The US heavy bombers at RAF Fairford were carrying out defensive operations, not attacking Iran.
    The context
    CNN's report of the same charges says the base "had been used by US B-1 bombers to carry out strikes on Iran". "Defensive operations" is the UK government's description of the permission it granted. The article never attributes the phrase to anyone, and never says the bombers struck Iran.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says that Iran has firmly rejected the accusations. A reader is left believing that the claim of Iranian state direction stands unanswered.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from ITV News

  1. 28 OctFamily of UK couple jailed in Iran demand stronger action after Miliband meeting0.0
  2. 22 OctIran says 7 oil tankers attacked in the Strait of Hormuz as fears grow of a return to war0.0
  3. 22 OctIran says 7 tankers were damaged in the Strait of Hormuz, and other Mideast news0.0
  4. 20 OctTwo men re-arrested on suspicion of assisting Iran over RAF Fairford incident3.0
  5. 20 Oct2 men rearrested in UK on suspicion of assisting Iran over suspected plot at a US-run air base0.0

Everything we scored from ITV News