Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on Iran, 15 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Report: Trump may hold off on Iran strikes if Tehran avoids new provocations

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findingsSee it marked on israelnationalnews.com

US President Donald Trump is considering postponing additional military strikes against Iran if Tehran and Yemen's Iran-backed Houthi movement refrain from further provocations, Reuters reported, citing three people familiar with recent discussions. According to the report, Trump raised the possibility during meetings with senior national security advisers and following intelligence briefings. However, he has not reached a final decision on whether to resume major military operations.

The President has repeatedly shifted between threatening renewed attacks and suggesting that the conflict could be brought to an end. Trump has also expressed sympathy for Middle Eastern allies who oppose another major escalation. "I could end it immediately, but at the request of the nations that I am looking to protect, we are doing it a little bit longer way, a bit more civilly," Trump told broadcaster Stephen A. Smith on Thursday. Reuters reported that Trump sought advice from Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan during telephone conversations over the past two weeks.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says that Trump launched this war in February together with Israel. Reuters, as carried by the Jerusalem Post, Ynet and Al Arabiya, says so in the same report the article rewrites. Without it, the headline's condition that Tehran avoid "new provocations" and the talk of resuming operations leave a reader believing US strikes are a response to Iranian conduct, not the continuation of a war Washington began.

How we know

Both leaders urged him to avoid resuming strikes, although he made no commitment. During an October 31 conversation, Trump reportedly told the Saudi crown prince that he intended to attack Iran after the US midterm elections. Bin Salman appealed to him to reconsider, arguing that economic sanctions were already weakening Tehran. Trump has also spoken with Erdogan three times since October 28. According to the Turkish presidency, their November 7 conversation emphasized the need to end tensions between Washington and Tehran.

Left out here: Drops what it reported before

Five days earlier Arutz Sheva reported, citing the Financial Times, that Netanyahu was urging Trump to resume strikes, though one source disputed that there was a push. This article names the allies urging restraint but drops the Israeli side of the pressure on Trump's decision.

How we know

American intelligence assessments indicate that the US naval blockade and economic sanctions are damaging Iran's economy and are . The US military is also seeking to prevent weapons and sanctioned materials from reaching Iran through land routes and the Caspian Sea, expanding its existing restrictions on Iranian maritime traffic. Despite the possibility of delaying additional strikes, American forces remain prepared for renewed military action.

Three sources familiar with US planning told Reuters that a third aircraft carrier is heading toward the Middle East to replace one of the two already deployed there. All three could remain in the region if circumstances require. Another option under consideration is a renewed attack on Iran's underground nuclear facilities, although those sites have already been targeted and the effectiveness of further strikes remains uncertain. US intelligence officials have also assessed that additional military attacks would be unlikely to substantially alter Iran's negotiating demands.

Meanwhile, Trump has received briefings about American weapons inventories, including shortages of certain precision munitions. Reuters previously reported in August that the military had exhausted “virtually all" of its long-range precision munitions. A source familiar with the situation said those supplies had not yet been replenished. The White House rejected suggestions that ammunition shortages could restrict the President's military options.

"The United States Military has enough munitions and ammo to serve all of the Commander-in-Chief’s strategic goals and beyond," a White House official said. Addressing Trump's deliberations, the official emphasized that the President alone would determine the administration's next steps. "As Commander-in-Chief, President Trump is the architect and sole decision-maker who holds all the cards and will always ensure that America’s interests are protected," the official stated.

"The United States is in a very strong position with control of the Strait of Hormuz and the Iranian economy collapsing. Only President Trump knows what he will do, and when." Neither the CIA nor the Office of the Director of National Intelligence responded to requests for comment, while Saudi Arabia's Foreign Ministry also declined to provide a response. Trump made clear Thursday that further strikes against Iran remain an option. Speaking with the Salem News Channel , the President was asked whether he would hesitate to order another military attack against the Iranian regime.

"No. No hesitation. We're doing very well with it right now. We're taking out more oil now than we did before the, if you call it a war, before the war started. We're taking out more oil," Trump responded. He also defended the results of the American military campaign, emphasizing the damage inflicted on Iran and the absence of recent US military fatalities. "And you know, the thing about the war. We've been fighting, you know, pretty, at a pretty rapid clip for three weeks, not seven months, for three weeks.

Nobody's been killed in the last five months. You know, in Russia, they're losing 25,000 people a month between Russia and Ukraine, mostly soldiers. We haven't lost a soldier in five months and we control the Gulf...but the answer is if I saw things going the other way, I would, I would do that. And it's, it's possible I would do it right now," Trump added.

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

Arutz Sheva gives a careful, attributed rewrite of the Reuters report on Trump weighing a pause in strikes on Iran, but it calls Iran's government "the regime" in its own voice. It leaves out that Trump launched the war in February with Israel, which the same Reuters report states. It also drops its own earlier report that Netanyahu was urging renewed strikes, a claim one source disputed.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “likely to maintain pressure on the regime”

    Why this matters
    In its own narration of a US intelligence assessment, Arutz Sheva swaps Iran's government for "the regime".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the outlet's verdict on Iran's government as a neutral description from the intelligence assessment.
    The context
    The same Reuters material, as carried by Al Arabiya, says the blockade and sanctions would put pressure on Tehran. The word "regime" is the outlet's own addition.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says that Trump launched this war in February together with Israel. Reuters, as carried by the Jerusalem Post, Ynet and Al Arabiya, says so in the same report the article rewrites. Without it, the headline's condition that Tehran avoid "new provocations" and the talk of resuming operations leave a reader believing US strikes are a response to Iranian conduct, not the continuation of a war Washington began.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  3. Drops what it reported before

    Minor

    What is missing

    Five days earlier Arutz Sheva reported, citing the Financial Times, that Netanyahu was urging Trump to resume strikes, though one source disputed that there was a push. This article names the allies urging restraint but drops the Israeli side of the pressure on Trump's decision.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “Reuters reported, citing three people familiar with recent discussions”

    The article attributes the central claim to Reuters and its anonymous sources, so the reader knows it is a report of private remarks, not a confirmed decision.

  • “US intelligence officials have also assessed that additional military attacks would be unlikely to substantially alter Iran's negotiating demands”

    The article keeps the US intelligence assessment that cuts against the case for more strikes, instead of leaving the White House's claims unanswered.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 14 NovIran warns modified ballistic missiles could reach Britain0.0
  2. 14 NovTwo tankers strike mines in Strait of Hormuz6.0
  3. 14 NovIRGC-linked outlet says Iran could develop missiles that reach US3.0
  4. 14 NovWhere did another enrichment site in Iran come from?3.0
  5. 13 NovReport: Mossad chief in Washington as Netanyahu pushes for renewed Iran strikes0.0

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News