The Scotsman, on Climate, 5 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

John Swinney confirms SNP U-turn on new North Sea oil and gas

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

John Swinney has said he opposes a UK government bid to ban new oil and gas exploration in the North Sea, confirming the SNP has U-turned on the issue. The First Minister said each application should instead be assessed on a case-by-case basis as to whether it is better for the climate than importing fossil fuels. It comes almost four years after the SNP’s draft energy strategy, published under Nicola Sturgeon, included a presumption against new oil and gas drilling.

Decisions over North Sea licensing are reserved to the UK government, but the SNP has long taken a position. This has shifted under Mr Swinney to become more favourable to the industry, and his latest comments confirm the ‘presumption against’ has now been ditched. The Scottish Greens called it “a shameful retreat and a slap in the face for future generations”. The UK government announced its draft Energy Independence Bill on Wednesday, which would put into law the ban on new oil and gas exploration in the North Sea.

The announcement drew the ire of both industry and the Prime Minister’s political opposition. Speaking during First Minister’s Questions in Holyrood, Mr Swinney said: “The Energy Independence Bill that was introduced by the UK government brings together a number of measures that the Scottish government supports, but we do not support the provisions of that Bill in relation to the position on the granting of new licenses for the exploration of new oil and gas fields.”

He said any new applications “need to be considered in relation to their impact on our carbon reduction targets and given the fact that we’re going to be using oil and gas for some years to come”. Malcolm Offord, the leader of Reform UK in Scotland, said he was “delighted” by Mr Swinney’s “U-turn”. He added: “It’s time now to re-industrialise our country again, to re-energise our country again, to get our people back to work and loud and proud again.

“We cannot do that with the most expensive energy in the western world. “So let me ask the First Minister again, why has he not fought tooth and nail to keep the North Sea open? It is Scotland’s oil, why has John Swinney abandoned Scotland’s oil?” Responding, the First Minister said £2 billion would flow into the Treasury in tax revenues from the North Sea, accusing the UK government of cutting Scotland’s budget by £650 million in real terms.

Mr Offord called the Energy Independence Bill a “seismic moment” which would sound “the death knell for Aberdeen“. Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay also pushed the First Minister on oil and gas, asking if he supports the Rosebank oil field near Shetland – the same question he asked five times last week. Mr Swinney again said any approvals must be assessed for their impact on emissions. Scottish Greens co-leader Gillian Mackay said: “This is a shocking U-turn and another extremely disappointing step from John Swinney.

He is further shredding what remains of his party’s climate credentials. “It is a huge departure from only a few years ago when the Scottish government was committed to a presumption against oil and gas. “When even the UK government is taking a stronger position, it shows how far the SNP has drifted. It is a shameful retreat and a slap in the face for future generations. “The Scottish government should be putting people and planet first, not falling into line behind big polluters who are destroying our planet.”

It came as new polling showed almost two-thirds of Labour supporters want to see UK ministers approve Rosebank. found 65 per cent of those who backed Labour in the 2024 general election want to see the project – which is the largest undeveloped oil field in UK waters – get the green light. Despite Labour’s manifesto in 2024 under Sir Keir Starmer pledging no new oil and gas licences would be granted, less than a fifth (17 per cent) of the party’s voters said Rosebank should be rejected.

With the UK government, now under Andy Burnham, having already approved the Jackdaw gas field off the coast of Aberdeen, 68 per cent of Labour supporters agreed this was the right decision. The polling – which questioned 2,050 adults across the UK – found that overall, 55 per cent of people were in favour of increasing the country’s domestic oil and gas production, with 63 per cent saying Rosebank should be given the go-ahead.

Read the original article on scotsman.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Scotsman reports John Swinney's opposition to the UK ban on new North Sea exploration fairly, with his words attributed and critics from several parties quoted. It then closes the piece on polling commissioned by Offshore Energies UK and never tells the reader that OEUK is the trade body for North Sea oil and gas companies. It also lets Reform UK's suggestion that North Sea oil and gas means affordable energy stand without challenge.

  1. Hides who the source is

    Serious

    “Research by Opinium for Offshore Energies UK (OEUK)”

    Why this matters
    The words "for Offshore Energies UK (OEUK)" name the client behind the poll but give no description of who OEUK is or what it campaigns for.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the Rosebank and Jackdaw figures in the last five sentences as neutral public opinion research from an ordinary organisation.
    The context
    OEUK is the trade association for UK offshore energy, formerly Oil & Gas UK, representing North Sea oil and gas companies and running the Back the North Sea campaign. It has a direct interest in Rosebank being approved. The article ends on its commissioned figures with no word on that interest.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“with 63 per cent saying Rosebank should be given the go-ahead”
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “trade association”.

    Show it in the article

  2. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Minor

    “We are floating on a sea of affordable and secure oil and gas – it is madness to shut down the North Sea.”

    Why this matters
    The Reform UK leader's words "affordable and secure oil and gas" set beside "the most expensive energy in the western world" suggest that keeping the North Sea open would bring down energy costs.
    The impression it gives
    A reader may come away thinking that more North Sea drilling would make Scottish energy cheaper.
    The context
    The claim that new North Sea licences or drilling will lower UK energy bills is a catalogued false policy claim. The article gives Swinney's reply only on tax revenue and budget cuts, and nothing in the piece tests the suggestion about prices.

    How we know

    • From our register of false climate claimsThe claim: New North Sea oil and gas licences or more drilling will lower UK energy bills. What the evidence shows: Oil and gas prices in the UK are set internationally. The Climate Change Committee found that more UK extraction would have at most a marginal effect on the prices UK consumers face, and that extracting all proven reserves from new fields would meet only about 1% of European gas demand each year to 2050.Climate Change Committee, Letter to Kwasi Kwarteng: Climate compatibility of new oil and gas fields (February 2022) (opens in a new tab)
    • Elsewhere in the article“£2 billion would flow into the Treasury in tax revenues”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Scotsman

  1. 5 Nov'Absolutely horrified': SNP says it has no plans for a dedicated wildfire helicopter3.0
  2. 4 NovSNP putting 'thousands of jobs at risk' with failure to triple Scotland's onshore wind capacity6.0
  3. 3 NovSNP’s climate targets thrown into doubt over Acorn carbon capture ‘fairy tale’3.0
  4. 3 NovScottish energy jobs and billions of investment 'in jeopardy' over Labour renewables pivot3.0
  5. 3 NovClimate scientists and oil industry agree: carbon capture is no 'fairytale'3.0

Everything we scored from The Scotsman