The Spectator opinion piece, on UK Politics, 10 November 2026
We do not republish articles from The Spectator. Our findings are below, each quoting the words it is about. Read the full article on the outlet's own site.
Read the original article on spectator.com (opens in a new tab)The Spectator reports that Labour has suspended David Walliams's membership after a joint Guardian and ITV report of allegations that he preyed on teenage girls and young women. It names the report as the source of the allegations, marks the central claims as alleged or reported, and gives Walliams's denial and his lawyers' account.
Opinion piece: read for false claims of fact and for fairness to the people it names, not for its opinions.
“According to a joint report from the Guardian and ITV, multiple women allege”
The article names the source of the allegations and keeps them as allegations. It does not turn them into established fact in its own voice.
“Walliams denies that he had any sexual contact with this woman, and says he never engaged in grooming young women.”
The article gives the accused man's denial plainly, after the specific allegation it answers.
“Walliams is alleged to have preyed on a 15-year-old girl in the summer of 2007.”
The article states the girl's age and the date. It keeps the claim attributed as an allegation, so the reader knows how serious it is and that it is not proven.
Spot something we missed? Report this article