Deutsche Welle (English), on Gaza, 28 September 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Ireland beat Israel 3-0 in controversial Nations League match

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

The Irish team bowed their heads during playing of the Israeli national anthem on Sunday night and they declined to shake hands with their opponents, a gesture that is customary before international fixtures. Ireland played the match wearing black armbands in memory of those killed in , and just 24 hours earlier it was unclear whether the match would go ahead at all. 'Significant majority' vote to play On Saturday, the players voted in favor of playing what was technically a home match for Israel in Debrecen, Hungary , despite widespread opposition to their participation among the Irish public.

David Courell, the chief executive of the Irish FA (FAI), told a press conference that had been delayed for several hours while players and coaches met to discuss the issue, that a significant majority of the squad had voted to play. "Based on that, the association took ⁠the decision on behalf of Irish ​football that this fixture would continue, as we have always intended to fulfil the fixtures," he said. However, the vote was not unanimous and one player, reserve goalkeeper Gavin Bazunu, decided to pull out of the squad for this and a second match against Israel during this international break.

In Sunday's match, Troy Parrott netted the opener for Ireland in the 14th minute, with ​Adam Idah scoring two minutes later. Jack Moylan added a third in the 25th to make the final score 3-0. Troy Parrott opened the scoring for Ireland Image: Inpho Photography/IMAGO Few supporters present The fixture was played in a largely empty stadium in Debrecen , with just a few hundred Israeli fans and a handful of Irish supporters in attendance.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

DW mentions the few hundred Israeli fans present but not that they booed the Irish players, chanted for the Israeli army, or that Jayson Molumby drew the referee's attention to alleged racial abuse of Adam Idah. Without this, a reader assumes the crowd passed without incident and that the only charged behaviour came from the Irish side.

How we know

The FAI had not reserved any tickets for their fans to attend the match and public broadcaster RTE showed the match without the usual halftime analysis. Over the previous few days, the Irish team had been under intense pressure from Irish fans and politicians to boycott the fixture. Ireland has long been a strong supporter of the Palestinian cause and formally recognized a Palestinian state in 2024 alongside Spain and Norway. Dublin has also repeatedly criticized Israel over .

A Hamas raid into Israel on October 7, 2023, killed around 1,200 people, prompting Israel's attack on Gaza which has killed over 73,000. Ireland's next Nations League match was originally scheduled to be played in Dublin on October 4, but due to security concerns, it has been moved to the Serbian town of Backa Topola, where it is to be played behind closed doors. Edited by: Jonathan Harding

Read the original article on dw.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

DW reports Ireland's 3-0 win over Israel, the squad vote and the protest gestures accurately, and it states the Palestinian toll and the actor plainly. Twice, in its own voice, it calls Israel's genocide in Gaza a "military operation" and "the Gaza conflict". It also leaves out the Israeli fans' booing and alleged racial abuse of Adam Idah that other outlets reported.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Israel's military operation in the Gaza Strip”

    Why this matters
    DW names the killing that the black armbands mark as "Israel's military operation", a phrase drawn from a state's own vocabulary for its campaign.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the deaths the players mourned as the result of an ordinary military campaign.
    The context
    The UN Commission of Inquiry found that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza. Other coverage of the same match described the armbands as marking those killed in Israel's genocide. DW never uses the word genocide anywhere in the article.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “the Gaza conflict”

    Why this matters
    DW calls what Dublin criticises "the Gaza conflict", a phrase that suggests two comparable sides.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking Ireland's criticism concerns a two-sided conflict rather than a one-sided killing campaign.
    The context
    The article's own next sentence gives over 73,000 killed in Israel's attack on Gaza. The documented record is a UN finding of genocide, and the boycott pressure was over that genocide.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    DW mentions the few hundred Israeli fans present but not that they booed the Irish players, chanted for the Israeli army, or that Jayson Molumby drew the referee's attention to alleged racial abuse of Adam Idah. Without this, a reader assumes the crowd passed without incident and that the only charged behaviour came from the Irish side.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “Israel's attack on Gaza which has killed over 73,000”

    DW names Israel as the actor, uses the word killed, and states the Palestinian toll with no caveat, the same treatment it gives the Israeli figure in the same sentence.

  • “in memory of those killed in Israel's military operation”

    DW says plainly that people were killed and who killed them, where the FAI itself spoke only of "lives lost in the conflict".

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Deutsche Welle (English)

Everything we scored from Deutsche Welle (English)