Daily Express, on UK Politics, 5 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Andy Burnham offers 'those that can contribute' for January 2027 tax hike

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Andy Burnham offers 'those that can contribute' excuse for January 2027 tax hike The hike kicks in on January 1 and will help cover the cost of some of the measures aimed at easing the cost of living outlined in the Budget Share Article Share Article Facebook X LinkedIn Reddit Bluesky Email Copy Link Link copied Add us as preferred source Comments By Howard Lloyd 06:01, Thu, Nov 5, 2026 Andy Burnham explained the thinking behind the tax rise (Image: Getty) Andy Burnham has explained the reasoning behind outlined in the Budget which takes effect on January 1, 2027.

Chancellor of the Exchequer John Healy proposed a number of headline-grabbing measures in last week's announcement, including a £100 energy payment for 20million households, shifting the green levy onto general taxation, and scrapping the standing charge on gas bills. The energy payment alone comes at a cost of £2.6billion for the Government. Named ' Breathing space for today, hope for the future ', the Budget forms part of the Prime Minister's plan to introduce small changes to help people with the cost of living .

Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT To pay for some of these measures, Mr Burnham has introduced a banking tax. It sees the banks' surcharge increased from the current three per cent rate to a maximum of six per cent. It is on top of the corporation tax of 25 per cent that they currently pay. Banks had feared that the increase would be even higher, and shares in many of the big banks climbed after their fears were alleviated. Get the latest politics news - straight from our team in Westminster and more I would like to receive emails from the Daily Express featuring our latest products, services, offers, and promotions from across the Reach Plc family .

Subscribe Invalid email You agree you are 18 or over. We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. You can unsubscribe at any time. More Info . View this post on Instagram A post shared by Andy Burnham (@andy.burnham) It is due to start on January 1 and will last for 15 months. It is thought the measure will raise around £1.5billion.

"Amid global economic storms, I am looking to our banks to help fund ​breathing space for British families," Mr Healey told Parliament. Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT Explaining the measure, Mr Burnham said that he would always ask 'those who can contribute to support the wider common good'. He said: "People helped banks when the banks needed support (in 2007-09), and now to ask banks to return that favour. Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT "We did do that (in the Budget), and other companies that we would say create challenges in communities, gambling particularly, we asked gambling companies to pay more so we could help those high street shops.

So the principle is there. What we will do is always ask those who can contribute to support the wider common good." Major update on cutting state pension age to 65 Ed Miliband just went haywire again – this could spell curtains for Andy Burnham Big British lenders have reported bumper profits in recent years, fuelled by favourable interest ​rates, which boosted lending income. UK Finance, the industry lobby group, has ​said Britain ⁠already taxes banks higher than in other major financial centres.

It estimated in a report this month that the UK banking sector paid £25.7 billion in direct taxation in the year to ⁠end-March. Bank profits ​will now be taxed temporarily at a total ​rate including corporation tax of 31%, following the new surcharge. ⁠Angeline Ong, analyst at investing and trading platform IG, said the temporary nature of the measure will be of huge relief to the banks . She said: "The fixed end date matters as much as the size, because it turns a potential reset of bank earnings into a one-off charge, and investors appear to be reading it as a bump rather than ​lasting damage to their ​earnings base."

Commenting on the change, Carlota Estragues Lopez, equity strategist at SJP , said: “The UK government has increased the bank surcharge by 3 per cent, taking it to 6 per cent, but stopped short of the more significant increase some lenders had feared. The decision reflects recognition of the banking sector’s importance to the UK economy and the risk that a heavier tax burden could weigh on growth and investment. While the UK tax regime remains relatively uncompetitive internationally, markets welcomed the more measured approach, with major UK bank shares rising 3–4 per cent following the announcement.”

Andy Burnham Budget 2026 Money saving John Healey Barclays NatWest Nationwide Santander Lloyds Lloyds Bank Cost of living Share Article Share Article Facebook X LinkedIn Reddit Bluesky Email Copy Link Link copied Add us as preferred source Comments

Read the original article on express.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Daily Express headline calls Andy Burnham's explanation for a rise in the bank surcharge an 'excuse', though the body reports him explaining his reasoning and gives his argument. The opening line calls the change 'a six per cent tax hike', while the article's own figures show the surcharge rose three points, from 3 to 6 per cent.

  1. Uses figures that mislead

    Minor

    “a six per cent tax hike”

    Why this matters
    The Express calls the measure 'a six per cent tax hike'.
    The impression it gives
    A tax has gone up by six per cent, or a new six per cent tax has been added.
    The context
    The article's own figures show the bank surcharge rose by three percentage points, from 3 to 6 per cent. Six per cent is the new rate, not the size of the rise.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“from the current three per cent rate to a maximum of six per cent”
    • Elsewhere in the article“has increased the bank surcharge by 3 per cent, taking it to 6 per cent”

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “excuse”

    Why this matters
    The headline calls Burnham's stated reason an 'excuse'.
    The impression it gives
    Burnham is making a pretext for something unjustified.
    The context
    The body describes him as explaining the reasoning and gives his argument that banks were helped in 2007 to 2009 and should now contribute. Nothing in the article shows the reason is a pretext.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Explaining the measure, Mr Burnham said”
    • Elsewhere in the article“People helped banks when the banks needed support”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Express

  1. 5 NovThe nastiest money surprises hidden in the Budget's small print - 'this one will sting'3.0
  2. 5 NovJohn Healey just changed the state pension rules - and he's made it really complicated8.0
  3. 5 NovBrexit bombshell as 'euro optional for rejoining EU' - but there's a massive catch3.0
  4. 5 Nov‘Smoky bacon’ crisps face ban under Andy Burnham Brexit reset deal3.0
  5. 5 NovState pensioners told 'it's likely to count' over tax changes announced in Budget6.0

Everything we scored from Daily Express