Al-Monitor, on UK Politics, 4 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Britain's Green Party votes to class Zionism as a form of racism

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

By David Milliken LONDON, Oct 4 (Reuters) - Britain's Green Party voted on Sunday to class Zionism as a form of racism, and from the Israeli government which said it now viewed the party as "a body that gives legitimacy to terrorism". The party – which received 6% of the vote in national elections in 2024 – said it regarded Zionism as "an ethnonationalist political project" and repeated its call for Britain's Labour government to end all arms trade with Israel.

"The motion also restates the Green Party's backing for the right to self-determination and calls for the establishment of a single democratic state throughout historic Palestine," the party said in a statement. The definition of Zionism – which inspired the foundation of the modern state of Israel in the 20th century – and what it implies for the rights of non-Jews in Israel and neighbouring territory, is contentious. Jewish groups sometimes define it as a right to Jewish self-determination.

The Green Party motion passed by a majority of 1,022 to 813 despite opposition from many senior figures. Party leader Zack Polanski, who is seeking election to Parliament on Thursday in former Prime Minister Keir Starmer's now-vacant London constituency, did not vote. The result was condemned by British Jewish groups. "The Green Party has made antisemitism party policy and become a racist party," the Movement for Progressive Judaism said, adding that the support of some Jews for the motion did not mean it would not be used to discriminate against others.

Mothin Ali, deputy leader of the Green Party and a supporter of the motion, told Sky News on Saturday that in – was the key context for the vote. "The motion defines Zionism quite clearly. It defines it as an ethnonationalist movement. It defines it as ethnic cleansing. It defines it as genocide," Ali said.

Britain's government views Israeli settlers' actions in the West Bank as amounting to ethnic cleansing but has said courts must decide if other Israeli actions qualify as genocide. Israel – which rejects claims of ethnic cleansing and genocide – called on Sunday for other British political parties to condemn the Green Party vote. "The Greens have adopted not only the green of Hamas, but also its ideology: the elimination of the State of Israel through armed struggle," it said.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article gives genocide only as the British government's view that courts must decide and as a claim that Israel rejects. It never says that a UN Commission of Inquiry has found Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, so a reader believes no investigating body has reached that finding.

How we know

Polanski and other senior Green Party figures said they would "continue to call out the heinous crimes of the Netanyahu government" and that "there is no conflict between supporting the rights of Palestinians and the rights of Jewish people". (Reporting by David Milliken; Editing by David Holmes)

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

Reuters quotes the joint statement by Polanski and senior Greens but drops its sentence committing them to oppose genocide, ethnic cleansing, apartheid and the illegal occupation. A reader sees only a general line about the Netanyahu government.

How we know

Read the original article on al-monitor.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

Al-Monitor runs Reuters copy that reports the Green Party vote accurately but turns Israel's genocide in Gaza into 'Israel's conflict with Hamas' and inserts, in its own voice, that it followed the 2023 Hamas attack, in the middle of a paraphrase of the deputy leader. It reduces the Palestinian dead to a 'death toll' with no killer, and leaves genocide only as a claim that courts must decide and Israel rejects, never mentioning the UN Commission of Inquiry's finding.

  1. Tells the event as something else

    Minor

    “Israel's conflict with Hamas – which followed the Palestinian militant group's deadly 2023 attack on an Israeli music festival”

    Why this matters
    Reuters calls Israel's assault on Gaza 'Israel's conflict with Hamas' and adds, in its own words, that it 'followed' the 2023 Hamas attack. This sits inside a paraphrase of Mothin Ali, whose quoted words say nothing of the kind.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes the killing in Gaza as a two-sided war started by Hamas, and may think Ali himself framed it that way.
    The context
    A UN Commission of Inquiry has found that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. NewsCord's count of the coverage records that Reuters inserted this clause into Ali's sentence in its own voice.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Writes the death out

    Minor

    “the heavy Palestinian death toll”

    Why this matters
    Reuters describes the dead in Gaza as a 'heavy Palestinian death toll'. It uses no word for killing and names no one who killed them.
    The impression it gives
    The reader is left with deaths that simply happened, with no actor and no scale.
    The context
    The Palestinians were killed by Israeli occupation forces in what a UN Commission of Inquiry has found to be genocide. The article never uses the word killed in its own voice and gives no figure.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Treats British Jews as one bloc

    Minor

    “drawing criticism from British Jews”

    Why this matters
    Reuters says the vote drew criticism 'from British Jews', as if all British Jews opposed it.
    The impression it gives
    The reader assumes Jewish people in Britain stand together against the motion.
    The context
    The article itself records that some Jews supported the motion. Other coverage reports that a Holocaust survivor endorsed it.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  4. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article gives genocide only as the British government's view that courts must decide and as a claim that Israel rejects. It never says that a UN Commission of Inquiry has found Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, so a reader believes no investigating body has reached that finding.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  5. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    Reuters quotes the joint statement by Polanski and senior Greens but drops its sentence committing them to oppose genocide, ethnic cleansing, apartheid and the illegal occupation. A reader sees only a general line about the Netanyahu government.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Our analysisFifteen news reports on the Greens' Zionism vote gave the Israeli state 773 words and Palestinians 98. Thirteen quoted no Palestinian at all.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Al-Monitor

Everything we scored from Al-Monitor