The Jewish Chronicle, on UK Politics, 25 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Board of Deputies votes to declare Greens a ‘racist party’

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

The Board of Deputies has overwhelmingly voted to condemn the Green Party of England and Wales as a “racist party” following its declaration that Zionism was racism at its conference earlier this month. At an online meeting, by a majority of 118 to one, members of the representative body said that the party “has, by adopting an antisemitic platform, become a racist party, and that the Board shall treat it as it has treated other racist parties”.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never reports that the Green Party rejected the Board's characterisation of its motion and of the party, or that it denies discriminating against people who hold Zionist views. Without this, a reader believes the 'racist party' charge went unanswered.

How we know

Laura Marks, who chaired Sunday's debate on the Green Party[Missing Credit] President Phil Rosenberg urged members to support the resolution, which was proposed by Ashley Hirst, a deputy for Hendon’s Ner Israel Synagogue, and Max Royston, a representative for St John’s Wood (United) Synagogue. In his opening, Hirst linked Zionism to more than two millennia of Jewish history and religious tradition. “In every age we have spoken of our bond with Zion in the language of the day,” he said.

Modern Zionism was “ a people returning to its homeland after 2,000 years of praying”, he went on. "Zionism, ancient and modern, was part of Jewish identity and who we are and our tribe was bound to Zion long before the Green Party had heard of it.” The Green Party, he felt, had “crossed a Rubicon. A major UK party has written into its platform that a core part of Jewish identity is racist. "The time for asking nicely has passed. The time for us as British Jews to stand up for ourselves with pride is now.”

South Hampstead deputy Denise Lester, condemning the Green’s policy, said: “We should call this out for what it is, antisemitism pure and simple.” The Board resolution noted that the organisation had previously named political parties as racist, citing the campaign against the National Front in the 1970s. It described the Greens’ call for a “single democratic Palestinian state in all of historic Palestine” as meaning “the erasure of the State of Israel in its entirety”.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article gives the Greens' motion only through the Board's reading of it. It never says the motion describes Zionism as an ideology supporting an ethnonationalist state, refers to an apartheid regime, or affirms Palestinian self-determination. A reader is left believing the motion simply declares Jewish identity racist.

How we know

It called on other parties to repudiate political alliances with the Greens “unless in the case of local government the Green Party local leadership have given assurances of their rejection of the antisemitic platform and their support for overturning it”. The Board would “deem any political party which breaks that firewall in any way to be enabling racism,” it said. The Board would “engage with and support any Green Party representative who publicly repudiates the policy and commits to campaign for its reversal,” it stated.

It added that it would stand “with the Jewish members of the Green Party and with their allies who have opposed this policy”. It also called on the Greens “to rescind the policy and until it does, to confirm in writing that no member will be subject to its anti-racism procedures because of their Jewish identity or affiliation to a Jewish community institution”. Former Board senior vice-president Laura Marks, who chaired the plenary session, .

Read the original article on thejc.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Jewish Chronicle reports the Board of Deputies' 118 to one vote accurately and attributes every charge to the Board and its deputies. Every voice in the piece is a Board member. The Green Party's rejection of the charge, which the BBC and GB News carried, is missing. The Greens' motion appears only through the Board's description of it, so a reader meets the 'racist party' verdict with nothing set against it.

  1. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “described the vote as “a landmark moment” for the organisation”

    Why this matters
    The Jewish Chronicle closes on Laura Marks calling the vote “a landmark moment”. This is the last of a run of quotes from Board officers and deputies.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away believing the Board's verdict is the whole story and that the Green Party has nothing to say in its own defence.
    The context
    The story concerns two parties, but the Greens speak nowhere in the article. Other outlets carried a Green spokesman rejecting the Board's characterisation and saying the party does not discriminate against people with Zionist views.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never reports that the Green Party rejected the Board's characterisation of its motion and of the party, or that it denies discriminating against people who hold Zionist views. Without this, a reader believes the 'racist party' charge went unanswered.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article gives the Greens' motion only through the Board's reading of it. It never says the motion describes Zionism as an ideology supporting an ethnonationalist state, refers to an apartheid regime, or affirms Palestinian self-determination. A reader is left believing the motion simply declares Jewish identity racist.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “by a majority of 118 to one, members of the representative body said that the party”

    It gives the exact vote and attributes the 'racist party' charge to the Board rather than stating it in its own voice.

  • “Board of Deputies votes to declare Greens a ‘racist party’”

    The headline keeps the charge in quotation marks and attaches it to the body that made it.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jewish Chronicle

  1. 27 OctGreens are no longer a party of peace after ‘Zionism is racism’ motion3.0
  2. 26 OctJonathan Powell’s flawed approach to Israel is more dangerous than his wife’s views7.3
  3. 26 OctBBC is biased against Israel and has been taken over by a ‘radical generation’, says former Panorama producer3.0
  4. 26 OctMan stormed into Jewish wedding on ‘hate spree’, court told0.0
  5. 25 OctBBC accused of giving Green activist ‘free rein’ to ‘launch disgusting attack’ on Jewish guest3.0

Everything we scored from The Jewish Chronicle